Chicago
2011 Team Stats (96 games)
97.6
PPG
90.8
Opp
+6.9
Margin
45.6%
FG%
35.8%
3P%
75.2%
FT%
43.9
RPG
22.0
APG
14.0
TO
104.9
Pace
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1085 (#43) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1080 (#68) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +11.8 (#18) | HCA +2.5 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.494 (#20) | - |
2011 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-10-27 | @ | OKC | L | 95 - 106 |
| 2010-10-30 | vs | DET | W | 101 - 91 |
| 2010-11-01 | vs | POR | W | 110 - 98 |
| 2010-11-04 | vs | NYK | L | 112 - 120 |
| 2010-11-05 | @ | BOS | L | 105 - 110 |
| 2010-11-08 | vs | DEN | W | 94 - 92 |
| 2010-11-11 | vs | GSW | W | 120 - 90 |
| 2010-11-13 | vs | WAS | W | 103 - 96 |
| 2010-11-16 | @ | HOU | W | 95 - 92 |
| 2010-11-17 | @ | SAS | L | 94 - 103 |
| 2010-11-19 | @ | DAL | W | 88 - 83 |
| 2010-11-23 | @ | LAL | L | 91 - 98 |
| 2010-11-24 | @ | PHX | W | 123 - 115 |
| 2010-11-26 | @ | DEN | L | 97 - 98 |
| 2010-11-27 | @ | SAC | W | 96 - 85 |
| 2010-12-04 | vs | HOU | W | 119 - 116 |
| 2010-12-06 | vs | OKC | W | 99 - 90 |
| 2010-12-08 | @ | CLE | W | 88 - 83 |
| 2010-12-10 | vs | LAL | W | 88 - 84 |
| 2010-12-18 | vs | LAC | L | 99 - 100 |
| 2010-12-21 | vs | PHI | W | 121 - 76 |
| 2010-12-22 | @ | WAS | W | 87 - 80 |
| 2010-12-25 | @ | NYK | L | 95 - 103 |
| 2010-12-26 | @ | DET | W | 95 - 92 |
| 2010-12-28 | vs | MIL | W | 90 - 77 |
| 2010-12-31 | vs | NJN | W | 90 - 81 |
| 2011-01-01 | vs | CLE | W | 100 - 91 |
| 2011-01-04 | vs | TOR | W | 111 - 91 |
| 2011-01-05 | @ | NJN | L | 94 - 96 |
| 2011-01-07 | @ | PHI | L | 99 - 105 |
| 2011-01-08 | vs | BOS | W | 90 - 79 |
| 2011-01-10 | vs | DET | W | 95 - 82 |
| 2011-01-12 | @ | CHA | L | 91 - 96 |
| 2011-01-14 | @ | IND | W | 99 - 86 |
| 2011-01-15 | vs | MIA | W | 99 - 96 |
| 2011-01-17 | @ | MEM | W | 96 - 84 |
| 2011-01-18 | vs | CHA | L | 82 - 83 |
| 2011-01-20 | vs | DAL | W | 82 - 77 |
| 2011-01-22 | vs | CLE | W | 92 - 79 |
| 2011-01-24 | vs | MIL | W | 92 - 83 |
| 2011-01-28 | vs | ORL | W | 99 - 90 |
| 2011-01-29 | vs | IND | W | 110 - 89 |
| 2011-02-02 | @ | LAC | W | 106 - 88 |
| 2011-02-05 | @ | GSW | L | 90 - 101 |
| 2011-02-07 | @ | POR | L | 103 - 109 |
| 2011-02-09 | @ | UTA | W | 91 - 86 |
| 2011-02-12 | @ | NOH | W | 97 - 88 |
| 2011-02-15 | vs | CHA | W | 106 - 94 |
| 2011-02-17 | vs | SAS | W | 109 - 99 |
| 2011-02-23 | @ | TOR | L | 113 - 118 |
| 2011-02-24 | vs | MIA | W | 93 - 89 |
| 2011-02-26 | @ | MIL | W | 83 - 75 |
| 2011-02-28 | @ | WAS | W | 105 - 77 |
| 2011-03-02 | @ | ATL | L | 80 - 83 |
| 2011-03-04 | @ | ORL | W | 89 - 81 |
| 2011-03-06 | @ | MIA | W | 87 - 86 |
| 2011-03-07 | vs | NOH | W | 85 - 77 |
| 2011-03-09 | @ | CHA | W | 101 - 84 |
| 2011-03-11 | vs | ATL | W | 94 - 76 |
| 2011-03-12 | vs | UTA | W | 118 - 100 |
| 2011-03-15 | vs | WAS | W | 98 - 79 |
| 2011-03-17 | @ | NJN | W | 84 - 73 |
| 2011-03-18 | @ | IND | L | 108 - 115 |
| 2011-03-21 | vs | SAC | W | 132 - 92 |
| 2011-03-22 | @ | ATL | W | 114 - 81 |
| 2011-03-25 | vs | MEM | W | 99 - 96 |
| 2011-03-26 | @ | MIL | W | 95 - 87 |
| 2011-03-28 | vs | PHI | L | 85 - 97 |
| 2011-03-30 | @ | MIN | W | 108 - 91 |
| 2011-04-01 | @ | DET | W | 101 - 96 |
| 2011-04-02 | vs | TOR | W | 113 - 106 |
| 2011-04-05 | vs | PHX | W | 97 - 94 |
| 2011-04-07 | vs | BOS | W | 97 - 81 |
| 2011-04-08 | @ | CLE | W | 93 - 82 |
| 2011-04-10 | @ | ORL | W | 102 - 99 |
| 2011-04-12 | @ | NYK | W | 103 - 90 |
| 2011-04-13 | vs | NJN | W | 97 - 92 |
| 2011-04-16 | vs | IND | W | 104 - 99 |
| 2011-04-18 | vs | IND | W | 96 - 90 |
| 2011-04-21 | @ | IND | W | 88 - 84 |
| 2011-04-23 | @ | IND | L | 84 - 89 |
| 2011-04-26 | vs | IND | W | 116 - 89 |
| 2011-05-02 | vs | ATL | L | 95 - 103 |
| 2011-05-04 | vs | ATL | W | 86 - 73 |
| 2011-05-06 | @ | ATL | W | 99 - 82 |
| 2011-05-08 | @ | ATL | L | 88 - 100 |
| 2011-05-10 | vs | ATL | W | 95 - 83 |
| 2011-05-12 | @ | ATL | W | 93 - 73 |
| 2011-05-15 | vs | MIA | W | 103 - 82 |
| 2011-05-18 | vs | MIA | L | 75 - 85 |
| 2011-05-22 | @ | MIA | L | 85 - 96 |
| 2011-05-24 | @ | MIA | L | 93 - 101 |
| 2011-05-26 | vs | MIA | L | 80 - 83 |
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Derrick Rose
|
G | 92 | 37.6 | 25.9 | 4.2 | 7.7 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 3.5 | 20.7 | 15.3 | - | - | - | 43.6 | 30.7 | 85.5 | - | 54.0 | 47.3 |
Luol Deng
|
G | 93 | 39.6 | 17.5 | 6.0 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.9 | 14.3 | 11.8 | - | - | - | 45.3 | 33.0 | 76.6 | - | 54.2 | 50.0 |
| Carlos Boozer | G | 70 | 31.7 | 16.4 | 9.7 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 13.7 | 13.3 | - | - | - | 49.6 | 0.0 | 72.2 | - | 53.2 | 49.6 |
| Joakim Noah | G | 59 | 32.6 | 10.8 | 10.6 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 8.2 | 16.4 | - | - | - | 49.2 | 0.0 | 74.1 | - | 54.9 | 49.2 |
| Kyle Korver | G | 93 | 19.0 | 8.0 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 6.7 | 4.4 | - | - | - | 42.7 | 41.5 | 89.9 | - | 56.6 | 53.7 |
Taj Gibson
|
G | 91 | 20.4 | 6.8 | 5.4 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 5.8 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 48.7 | 12.5 | 65.2 | - | 51.7 | 48.8 |
| Ronnie Brewer | G | 92 | 20.4 | 5.8 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 4.9 | 6.4 | - | - | - | 47.7 | 27.3 | 66.9 | - | 52.0 | 48.7 |
| C.J. Watson | G | 93 | 11.9 | 4.7 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 4.6 | 3.2 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 38.3 | 78.0 | - | 46.8 | 42.9 |
| Keith Bogans | G | 93 | 17.6 | 4.5 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 3.9 | 3.6 | - | - | - | 39.8 | 38.7 | 66.7 | - | 55.8 | 55.1 |
| Kurt Thomas | G | 57 | 21.3 | 4.0 | 5.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 3.5 | 7.7 | - | - | - | 51.5 | 33.3 | 62.5 | - | 53.0 | 51.7 |
| James Johnson | G | 10 | 9.6 | 3.4 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 3.4 | 3.3 | - | - | - | 38.2 | 25.0 | 46.2 | - | 42.8 | 41.2 |
| Omer Asik | G | 92 | 11.4 | 2.6 | 3.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 4.9 | - | - | - | 54.4 | 0 | 49.3 | - | 54.9 | 54.4 |
Rasual Butler
|
G | 9 | 3.2 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 0.8 | - | - | - | 58.3 | 62.5 | 0 | - | 79.2 | 79.2 |
| Brian Scalabrine | G | 17 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.9 | - | - | - | 52.6 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 52.6 | 52.6 |
| John Lucas III | - | 2 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 25.8 | 33.3 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG