Illinois State
2013 Team Stats (4 games)
72.0
PPG
67.7
Opp
+5.7
Margin
44.7%
FG%
38.3%
3P%
66.7%
FT%
31.8
RPG
15.5
APG
11.5
TO
77.2
Pace
Model Outputs
2012-2013
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1320 (#151) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1282 (#143) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1011 (#165) | HCA +147 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +25.0 (#137) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +17.4 (#61) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.383 (#75) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.412 (#118) | NetEff -3.2 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.464 (#67) | AdjNet -1.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.468 (#67) | AdjNet -1.1 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.655 (#65) | AdjO 69.6 | AdjD 62.5 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.803 (#82) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.775 (#84) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1089 (#131) | RD 145 | GP 33 |
2013 Schedule & Results
2013 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T. Brown
|
G | 32 | 29.6 | 18.1 | 4.4 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 2.9 | 5.1 | 18.8 | 33 | 1.3 | 2.9 | 41.5 | 39.1 | 73.7 | 0.6 | 153.1 | 51.8 |
J. Carmichael
|
F | 33 | 30.6 | 17.4 | 9.3 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 4.6 | 23.6 | 160 | 4.8 | 6.8 | 50.3 | 0.0 | 70.9 | 1.51 | 153.1 | 50.3 |
B. Allen
|
G | 32 | 28.4 | 8.6 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 9.0 | 127 | 4.0 | 6.3 | 35.5 | 24.1 | 69.2 | 1.13 | 122.4 | 42.1 |
J. Hill
|
G | 33 | 25.3 | 7.7 | 3.9 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 11.8 | 101 | 3.1 | 5.2 | 50.0 | 28.6 | 74.5 | 0.81 | 133.6 | 51.4 |
J. Wilkins
|
G-F | 33 | 20.0 | 6.7 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 9.2 | 101 | 3.1 | 6.2 | 49.1 | 25.0 | 73.9 | 0.84 | 175.9 | 53.8 |
J. Ekey
|
F | 33 | 22.9 | 6.4 | 4.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 10.7 | 122 | 3.7 | 6.8 | 38.5 | 26.7 | 66.7 | 1.26 | 153.7 | 44.6 |
N. Zeisloft
|
G | 25 | 15.2 | 4.5 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 5.4 | 136 | 5.4 | 13.6 | 36.7 | 33.3 | 87.5 | 1.39 | 167.1 | 50.0 |
G. Allen
|
G | 6 | 8.2 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 49 | 7.0 | 25.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.51 | 0 | 0 |
K. Keane
|
G | 31 | 18.4 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 6.0 | 56 | 1.8 | 3.8 | 39.1 | 50.0 | 75.0 | 0.04 | 167.6 | 50.0 |
Z. Upshaw
|
G | 18 | 7.8 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 3.4 | 25 | 1.3 | 4.4 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 0.0 | 0.07 | 162.7 | 71.4 |
J. Threloff
|
C | 21 | 7.9 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 4.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 44.4 | 0 | 50.0 | -0.39 | 268.2 | 44.4 |
A. Cousin
|
G | 27 | 8.4 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 65 | 2.5 | 7.8 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 0.44 | 126.5 | 33.3 |
M. Stacho
|
- | 3 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.3 | -0.3 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG