Duke
2026 Team Stats (38 games)
81.6
PPG
63.6
Opp
+18.0
Margin
49.1%
FG%
34.7%
3P%
72.9%
FT%
40.2
RPG
16.6
APG
10.7
TO
78.2
Pace
86.8
AdjO
57.7
AdjD
#2
Rank
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1482 (#2) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1507 (#3) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1239 (#3) | HCA +109 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +28.9 (#2) | HCA +2.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +38.2 (#5) | HCA +2.5 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.946 (#1) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.964 (#17) | NetEff +27.0 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.990 (#2) | AdjNet +39.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.990 (#2) | AdjNet +39.9 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.934 (#2) | AdjO 86.8 | AdjD 57.7 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.839 (#4) | AdjO 79.7 | AdjD 61.5 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.981 (#2) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.973 (#2) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1516 (#3) | RD 93 | GP 38 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cayden Boozer
|
- | 38 | 33.5 | 22.5 | 10.2 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 2.5 | 13.7 | 22.6 | 162 | 7.7 | 16.9 | 55.6 | 39.1 | 78.9 | 1.21 | 66.3 | 60.7 |
I. Evans
|
G | 38 | 28.3 | 15.0 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 11.3 | 8.5 | 262 | 12.5 | 20.5 | 43.3 | 36.1 | 86.0 | 2.17 | 59.5 | 55.0 |
P. Ngongba II
|
- | 32 | 21.9 | 10.1 | 5.8 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 5.9 | 12.3 | - | - | - | 60.6 | 25.8 | 66.4 | - | 65.7 | 62.8 |
C. Foster
|
G | 33 | 24.9 | 8.3 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 6.8 | 7.0 | 233 | 9.7 | 23.7 | 44.7 | 39.8 | 58.2 | 1.04 | 54.6 | 53.3 |
Cay. Boozer
|
- | 38 | 22.8 | 7.7 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 5.5 | 6.9 | 290 | 13.8 | 19.4 | 50.0 | 30.3 | 81.3 | 2.42 | 59.9 | 54.8 |
Dame Sarr
|
- | 38 | 23.5 | 6.4 | 3.8 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 5.4 | 6.1 | 229 | 10.9 | 24.2 | 40.6 | 32.3 | 53.2 | 2.14 | 52.1 | 51.0 |
Nikolas Khamenia
|
- | 38 | 19.7 | 5.7 | 3.3 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 4.4 | 5.5 | 139 | 6.6 | 15.9 | 44.4 | 34.0 | 67.3 | 0.97 | 57.2 | 54.7 |
M. Brown
|
F | 38 | 20.2 | 4.9 | 5.2 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 3.5 | 9.4 | 23 | 1.0 | 2.1 | 62.9 | 16.7 | 50.0 | -0.2 | 64.0 | 64.8 |
D. Harris
|
G | 36 | 9.6 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 88 | 4.2 | 6.0 | 36.3 | 33.3 | 76.9 | 0.38 | 55.0 | 48.9 |
I. Ufochukwu
|
- | 5 | 4.4 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.4 | -1 | -0.2 | -2.1 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.0 | -0.04 | 45.0 | 50.0 |
C. Sheffield
|
- | 15 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 25.0 | 28.6 | 0 | -0.07 | 33.3 | 33.3 |
J. Scott
|
- | 15 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 156 | 7.1 | 17.8 | 50.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 1.6 | 66.7 | 66.7 |
Sebastian Wilkins
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG