Duke
2012 Team Stats (26 games)
78.8
PPG
68.6
Opp
+8.7
Margin
45.9%
FG%
36.6%
3P%
69.1%
FT%
38.1
RPG
13.1
APG
11.7
TO
80.8
Pace
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1843 (#11) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1714 (#1) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +42.6 (#4) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.715 (#19) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.820 (#24) | NetEff +13.6 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.798 (#24) | AdjNet +12.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.800 (#25) | AdjNet +12.1 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E. Williams
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 18.0 | 13.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 12.0 | 24.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 50.0 | 0.03 | 65.4 | 66.7 |
A. Rivers
|
G | 34 | 33.2 | 15.5 | 3.4 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 10.1 | 9.6 | - | - | - | 44.7 | 38.0 | 65.0 | - | 64.1 | 52.3 |
C. Wells
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 14.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | -36 | -6.0 | -3.3 | 44.4 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.42 | 60.1 | 44.4 |
S. Curry
|
G | 34 | 30.2 | 13.2 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 8.6 | 9.1 | - | - | - | 42.5 | 38.7 | 85.7 | - | 67.6 | 51.9 |
R. Kelly
|
F | 31 | 25.9 | 11.8 | 5.4 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 6.8 | 11.9 | - | - | - | 43.9 | 40.2 | 79.4 | - | 68.6 | 51.7 |
M. Plumlee
|
F | 34 | 28.4 | 11.1 | 9.2 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 6.5 | 15.6 | - | - | - | 57.7 | 0 | 49.7 | - | 66.5 | 57.7 |
Haley Peters
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 12.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 41.7 | 41.7 |
A. Dawkins
|
G | 34 | 22.4 | 8.4 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 5.8 | 4.9 | - | - | - | 39.8 | 38.5 | 71.4 | - | 66.4 | 54.3 |
C. Gray
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 11.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 27.3 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 30.6 | 27.3 |
M. Plumlee
|
F | 34 | 20.5 | 6.6 | 7.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 3.9 | 10.7 | - | - | - | 62.6 | 0 | 64.6 | - | 70.8 | 62.6 |
Q. Cook
|
G | 33 | 11.7 | 4.4 | 1.0 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 3.2 | 4.1 | - | - | - | 40.2 | 25.9 | 77.1 | - | 57.0 | 46.7 |
T. Thornton
|
G | 34 | 21.1 | 4.1 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 5.6 | - | - | - | 40.3 | 38.2 | 77.5 | - | 72.9 | 53.9 |
S. Selby
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 75.0 | - | 26.0 | 0.0 |
J. Hairston
|
F | 29 | 8.5 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 45.0 | 0.0 | 66.7 | - | 55.3 | 45.0 |
M. Gbinije
|
F | 19 | 5.8 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 55.0 | 40.0 | 100.0 | - | 71.5 | 65.0 |
T. Zafirovski
|
F | 5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG