NC State
2012 Team Stats (10 games)
67.7
PPG
67.6
Opp
+5.3
Margin
41.9%
FG%
34.8%
3P%
64.7%
FT%
37.8
RPG
13.4
APG
13.0
TO
81.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1545 (#57) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1573 (#25) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +34.2 (#41) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.566 (#47) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.274 (#111) | NetEff -8.5 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.698 (#36) | AdjNet +7.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.702 (#36) | AdjNet +7.4 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C.J. Leslie
|
F | 34 | 29.0 | 14.7 | 7.3 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 6.1 | 17.4 | - | - | - | 51.7 | 16.7 | 58.8 | - | 100.1 | 51.9 |
L. Brown
|
G | 37 | 34.3 | 12.7 | 4.5 | 6.3 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 3.2 | 5.4 | 17.3 | 23 | 2.3 | 16.5 | 43.8 | 46.5 | 72.8 | 0.47 | 99.3 | 48.8 |
S. Wood
|
F | 36 | 32.9 | 12.4 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 4.1 | 12.4 | - | - | - | 36.9 | 34.3 | 86.4 | - | 132.8 | 49.3 |
R. Howell
|
F | 37 | 27.0 | 10.8 | 9.2 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 4.6 | 15.9 | - | - | - | 48.3 | 0.0 | 58.7 | - | 100.1 | 48.3 |
C.J. Williams
|
G-F | 37 | 31.1 | 10.6 | 3.8 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 4.5 | 11.9 | 54 | 4.9 | 2.9 | 48.2 | 34.0 | 81.0 | 1.94 | 111.8 | 53.3 |
D. Painter
|
C | 37 | 20.0 | 6.2 | 4.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 2.8 | 7.9 | - | - | - | 41.3 | 0.0 | 61.8 | - | 97.1 | 41.3 |
A. Johnson
|
G | 37 | 19.5 | 4.4 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 6.0 | 35 | 1.2 | 9.3 | 32.5 | 27.3 | 80.0 | 0.99 | 96.0 | 41.9 |
J. Vandenberg
|
C | 7 | 11.9 | 2.0 | 2.7 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 140.0 | 100.0 |
T. Harris
|
F | 19 | 6.9 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 1.8 | -34 | -3.4 | -5.1 | 36.4 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0.53 | 76.5 | 38.6 |
K. Smith
|
F | 6 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 2.3 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 75.0 | -0.04 | 106.4 | 50.0 |
T. de Thaey
|
F | 18 | 5.9 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 31.2 | 28.6 | 100.0 | - | 68.1 | 37.5 |
S. Battle
|
G | 6 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.3 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 150.0 | 75.0 |
J. Raymond
|
G | 10 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 40.0 | 0 | - | 90.0 | 60.0 |
J. Lewis
|
G | 2 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 14 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.02 | 0 | 0 |
B. Amos
|
- | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
P. Johnson
|
- | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG