Atlanta Dream

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Also known as: Atlanta Dream

Program History

2014 Team Stats (37 games)

80.8

PPG

78.8

Opp

+2.0

Margin

43.5%

FG%

30.6%

3P%

73.9%

FT%

37.5

RPG

19.5

APG

15.4

83.1

Est. poss./game

79.7

Adj PPG

78.6

Adj Opp PPG

Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2014

Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model	Output	Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More →	974 (#5)	-
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More →	1006 (#3)	-
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +59 elo More →	967 (#8)	HCA +59 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.4 More →	+1.1 (#3)	HCA +2.4
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.6 More →	-0.2 (#4)	HCA +2.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More →	0.573 (#3)	-
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +1.2 More →	0.535 (#3)	AdjNet +1.2
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +1.2 More →	0.535 (#3)	AdjNet +1.2
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 79.7 \| AdjD 78.6 More →	0.525 (#3)	AdjO 79.7 \| AdjD 78.6
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 78.6 \| AdjD 78.8 More →	0.496 (#4)	AdjO 78.6 \| AdjD 78.8
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More →	0.496 (#4)	Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More →	0.490 (#4)	Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 100 \| GP 37 More →	987 (#4)	RD 100 \| GP 37

2014 Schedule & Results

Date	Vs/At	Opponent	Result	Score
2014-05-16	vs	San Antonio Stars	W	79 - 75
2014-05-17	@	Indiana Fever	W	90 - 88
2014-05-24	@	Chicago Sky	L	73 - 87
2014-05-25	vs	Indiana Fever	L	77 - 82
2014-05-30	vs	Seattle Storm	W	80 - 69
2014-06-01	@	Connecticut Sun	L	76 - 85
2014-06-03	vs	Los Angeles Sparks	W	93 - 85
2014-06-07	vs	Chicago Sky	W	97 - 59
2014-06-13	vs	Minnesota Lynx	W	85 - 82
2014-06-15	@	Washington Mystics	W	75 - 67
2014-06-18	vs	Washington Mystics	W	83 - 73
2014-06-20	vs	New York Liberty	W	85 - 64
2014-06-22	@	New York Liberty	L	78 - 85
2014-06-26	@	San Antonio Stars	W	81 - 79
2014-06-29	@	Indiana Fever	W	76 - 68
2014-07-01	vs	Indiana Fever	L	70 - 77
2014-07-05	vs	Washington Mystics	W	86 - 73
2014-07-08	vs	Connecticut Sun	W	83 - 71
2014-07-12	@	Indiana Fever	W	93 - 74
2014-07-13	vs	Chicago Sky	W	81 - 79
2014-07-16	@	New York Liberty	L	75 - 77
2014-07-22	@	Minnesota Lynx	L	108 - 112
2014-07-25	vs	Chicago Sky	L	75 - 79
2014-07-27	@	Washington Mystics	L	67 - 77
2014-07-29	vs	Connecticut Sun	W	89 - 80
2014-07-31	@	Tulsa Shock	W	85 - 75
2014-08-03	vs	New York Liberty	L	76 - 83
2014-08-05	@	Phoenix Mercury	L	67 - 75
2014-08-07	@	Seattle Storm	L	68 - 88
2014-08-08	@	Los Angeles Sparks	L	77 - 80
2014-08-10	@	Chicago Sky	L	69 - 80
2014-08-13	vs	Phoenix Mercury	W	96 - 82
2014-08-15	vs	Tulsa Shock	W	92 - 76
2014-08-17	@	Connecticut Sun	L	55 - 84
2014-08-22	vs	Chicago Sky	L	77 - 80
2014-08-24	@	Chicago Sky	W	92 - 83
2014-08-26	vs	Chicago Sky	L	80 - 81

2014 Roster

Show Alumni

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player	Pos	GP	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FGA	Numbers	PM	PM GP	PM/G	PM/40	FG%	3P%	FT%	RAPM	TS%	eFG%
Angel McCoughtry	F	34	31.6	19.2	5.3	3.6	2.4	0.4	3.5	16.2	11.2	-	-	-	-	42.1	30.7	82.4	-	51.6	45.3
E. de Souza	F	37	29.7	13.6	8.4	1.2	1.1	1.4	1.6	10.8	13.2	-	-	-	-	53.5	0	69.1	-	56.2	53.5
Tiffany Hayes	G	38	28.6	12.9	3.0	2.5	0.9	0.3	1.2	9.1	9.3	-	-	-	-	46.1	35.4	77.5	-	58.6	52.6
D. Nowitzki	-	37	31.7	11.9	9.2	2.5	2.1	0.6	1.5	11.4	13.4	-	-	-	-	45.4	23.1	66.3	-	48.1	45.7
S. Schimmel	G	38	21.3	8.1	2.2	3.8	0.8	0.1	2.4	8.0	4.6	-	-	-	-	37.2	34.5	86.2	-	48.8	46.7
S. Prahalis	G	1	13.0	6.0	3.0	0.0	3.0	0.0	1.0	3.0	8.0	-	-	-	-	66.7	0	100.0	-	77.3	66.7
Jasmine Thomas	G	38	18.1	5.0	2.1	1.8	0.5	0.1	1.1	5.7	2.7	-	-	-	-	32.6	26.0	69.2	-	39.7	35.6
A. Henry-Morello	F	38	12.9	4.6	3.3	0.3	0.2	0.6	0.9	3.2	4.8	-	-	-	-	59.8	0	68.3	-	62.1	59.8
Billy Collins	-	2	11.5	4.5	1.0	0.0	0.5	1.5	1.5	3.5	2.5	-	-	-	-	28.6	50.0	100.0	-	51.4	35.7
C. Dumerc	G	29	19.1	3.4	2.0	4.0	1.1	0.1	2.1	3.4	5.1	-	-	-	-	30.6	24.1	69.4	-	43.0	37.2
N. Colhado	C	17	7.7	2.7	1.8	0.1	0.3	0.4	0.5	2.6	2.1	-	-	-	-	48.9	0	28.6	-	47.8	48.9
M. Ajavon	G	27	8.8	2.1	0.8	0.6	0.5	0.0	0.9	2.2	0.9	-	-	-	-	28.3	10.0	72.4	-	38.5	29.2
J. Player	G	1	8.0	2.0	0.0	1.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.0	1.0	-	-	-	-	50.0	0.0	0	-	50.0	50.0
S. Cash	F	18	9.4	1.8	1.1	0.7	0.3	0.2	0.9	2.7	0.6	-	-	-	-	24.5	0.0	47.4	-	28.8	24.5
A. Thompson	F	22	8.3	1.7	2.1	0.5	0.3	0.5	0.6	1.8	2.8	-	-	-	-	35.9	0	83.3	-	42.9	35.9
I. Orekhova	G	3	8.7	1.0	1.3	0.0	0.0	1.0	0.0	3.0	0.3	-	-	-	-	11.1	16.7	0.0	-	15.9	16.7
C. Harberts	F	1	9.0	0.0	3.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	2.0	1.0	-	-	-	-	0.0	0	0	-	0.0	0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2014 Shot Zones

2673 located field-goal attempts in 38 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Points: who the team's points here most likely come from

Misses: who misses most here

Angel McCoughtryE. de SouzaD. NowitzkiTiffany HayesS. SchimmelJasmine Thomas

Zone	FGM-FGA	FG%	Pts	Top scorer	Runner-up	Most misses	Runner-up
Restricted area	603-989	61.0	1206	E. de Souza 27% (324 pts)	Angel McCoughtry 20% (246 pts)	E. de Souza 21% (82 misses)	Angel McCoughtry 20% (78 misses)
Paint (non-RA)	139-397	35.0	278	E. de Souza 23% (64 pts)	D. Nowitzki 19% (54 pts)	E. de Souza 24% (61 misses)	Angel McCoughtry 17% (45 misses)
Mid-range left	92-275	33.5	184	D. Nowitzki 33% (60 pts)	Angel McCoughtry 21% (38 pts)	Angel McCoughtry 24% (44 misses)	D. Nowitzki 24% (44 misses)
Mid-range center	59-169	34.9	118	D. Nowitzki 54% (64 pts)	Angel McCoughtry 15% (18 pts)	D. Nowitzki 41% (45 misses)	Angel McCoughtry 16% (18 misses)
Mid-range right	96-301	31.9	192	D. Nowitzki 26% (50 pts)	Angel McCoughtry 23% (44 pts)	Angel McCoughtry 28% (57 misses)	D. Nowitzki 21% (43 misses)
Left corner 3	6-17	35.3	18	S. Schimmel 33% (6 pts)	Angel McCoughtry 17% (3 pts)	Jasmine Thomas 27% (3 misses)	Tiffany Hayes 27% (3 misses)
Right corner 3	5-13	38.5	15	Tiffany Hayes 60% (9 pts)	Angel McCoughtry 20% (3 pts)	Jasmine Thomas 62% (5 misses)	Tiffany Hayes 25% (2 misses)
Above-break 3 left	58-199	29.1	174	S. Schimmel 36% (63 pts)	Tiffany Hayes 28% (48 pts)	S. Schimmel 30% (43 misses)	Tiffany Hayes 21% (30 misses)
Above-break 3 center	37-98	37.8	111	S. Schimmel 43% (48 pts)	Angel McCoughtry 22% (24 pts)	Angel McCoughtry 36% (22 misses)	S. Schimmel 20% (12 misses)
Above-break 3 right	63-215	29.3	189	S. Schimmel 30% (57 pts)	Tiffany Hayes 30% (57 pts)	S. Schimmel 34% (52 misses)	Tiffany Hayes 22% (34 misses)