Rice Owls
2026 Team Stats (35 games)
Model Outputs
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1290 (#52) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1256 (#40) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1132 (#34) | HCA +106 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +11.1 (#70) | HCA +2.4 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +11.5 (#67) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.853 (#49) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More โ | 0.853 (#49) | NetEff +13.6 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.882 (#68) | AdjNet +17.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.885 (#69) | AdjNet +17.6 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.722 (#69) | AdjO 68.6 | AdjD 58.1 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.680 (#68) | AdjO 67.2 | AdjD 58.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.796 (#62) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.789 (#58) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1265 (#31) | RD 108 | GP 35 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dominique Ennis
|
G | 35 | 31.7 | 13.1 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 12.0 | 6.6 | 247 | 32 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 38.8 | 34.5 | 89.8 | -1.2 | 52.1 | 49.5 |
Victoria Flores
|
G | 33 | 31.0 | 12.2 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 10.1 | 7.3 | 322 | 30 | 10.7 | 14.2 | 33.7 | 29.9 | 87.0 | 4.43 | 50.3 | 40.4 |
Shelby Hayes
|
C | 35 | 28.2 | 12.0 | 6.0 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 9.2 | 9.7 | 285 | 32 | 8.9 | 12.8 | 50.5 | 50.0 | 79.8 | 2.55 | 56.4 | 50.8 |
Aniah Alexis
|
G | 35 | 31.1 | 10.0 | 5.9 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 9.7 | 8.0 | 280 | 32 | 8.8 | 11.6 | 35.7 | 31.9 | 90.4 | 1.26 | 47.3 | 42.0 |
Hailey Adams
|
G | 35 | 33.1 | 8.3 | 10.7 | 3.4 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 8.2 | 14.2 | 313 | 32 | 9.8 | 12.2 | 42.2 | 11.1 | 81.7 | 1.73 | 46.6 | 42.3 |
Louann Battiston
|
G | 35 | 20.6 | 7.0 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 6.2 | 3.1 | 167 | 32 | 5.2 | 10.6 | 38.0 | 33.8 | 85.7 | 1.92 | 52.0 | 48.1 |
Jordin Blackmon
|
G | 35 | 11.0 | 3.3 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 22 | 32 | 0.7 | 2.8 | 36.2 | 22.6 | 69.6 | -3.58 | 45.9 | 39.5 |
Mylee Guinn
|
G | 14 | 6.4 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 34 | 12 | 2.8 | 17.3 | 40.0 | 41.7 | 60.0 | -1.55 | 55.1 | 54.3 |
Layla Conley
|
G | 3 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.7 | - | - | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.04 | 150.0 | 150.0 |
Myah Hazelton
|
C | 35 | 7.9 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 2 | 32 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 42.6 | 0 | 47.8 | -3.45 | 44.2 | 42.6 |
Kennedy Clifton
|
G | 16 | 8.1 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 17 | 16 | 1.1 | 5.5 | 42.1 | 28.6 | 57.1 | -0.78 | 49.8 | 47.4 |
Jill Twiehaus
|
G | 8 | 4.4 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 2.0 | -0.4 | 1 | 7 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -3.37 | 24.3 | 25.0 |
Hanna Hilberth
|
C | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Pace Rickard
|
G | 8 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 8 | 7 | 1.1 | 20.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.57 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Skyla Tuthill
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG
2025-2026 Shot Zones
2160 located field-goal attempts in 35 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).
Dominique EnnisShelby HayesAniah AlexisVictoria FloresHailey Adams
| Zone | FGM-FGA | FG% | Pts | Top scorer | Runner-up | Most misses | Runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted area | 288-450 | 64.0 | 576 | Shelby Hayes 38% (216 pts) | Hailey Adams 17% (98 pts) | Shelby Hayes 40% (65 misses) | Hailey Adams 18% (29 misses) |
| Paint (non-RA) | 168-449 | 37.4 | 336 | Shelby Hayes 28% (94 pts) | Hailey Adams 22% (74 pts) | Shelby Hayes 25% (71 misses) | Hailey Adams 22% (61 misses) |
| Mid-range left | 42-155 | 27.1 | 84 | Dominique Ennis 24% (20 pts) | Hailey Adams 24% (20 pts) | Hailey Adams 22% (25 misses) | Aniah Alexis 17% (19 misses) |
| Mid-range center | 42-122 | 34.4 | 84 | Hailey Adams 29% (24 pts) | Aniah Alexis 24% (20 pts) | Aniah Alexis 29% (23 misses) | Hailey Adams 25% (20 misses) |
| Mid-range right | 71-224 | 31.7 | 142 | Aniah Alexis 27% (38 pts) | Dominique Ennis 20% (28 pts) | Victoria Flores 21% (32 misses) | Dominique Ennis 20% (31 misses) |
| Left corner 3 | 33-75 | 44.0 | 99 | Dominique Ennis 33% (33 pts) | Aniah Alexis 30% (30 pts) | Dominique Ennis 38% (16 misses) | Aniah Alexis 21% (9 misses) |
| Right corner 3 | 30-84 | 35.7 | 90 | Dominique Ennis 30% (27 pts) | Aniah Alexis 23% (21 pts) | Dominique Ennis 26% (14 misses) | Victoria Flores 19% (10 misses) |
| Above-break 3 left | 75-251 | 29.9 | 225 | Dominique Ennis 39% (87 pts) | Victoria Flores 20% (45 pts) | Dominique Ennis 39% (68 misses) | Victoria Flores 20% (36 misses) |
| Above-break 3 center | 28-102 | 27.5 | 84 | Dominique Ennis 39% (33 pts) | Louann Battiston 25% (21 pts) | Victoria Flores 24% (18 misses) | Dominique Ennis 23% (17 misses) |
| Above-break 3 right | 79-248 | 31.9 | 237 | Dominique Ennis 38% (90 pts) | Louann Battiston 22% (51 pts) | Dominique Ennis 33% (55 misses) | Victoria Flores 22% (37 misses) |