๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Tulane

2026-2027 Team Stats (3 games)

85.3
PPG
55.7
Opp
+29.7
Margin
43.9%
FG%
32.4%
3P%
72.6%
FT%
44.7
RPG
22.0
APG
14.0
TO
79.7
Est. poss./game
65.0
Adj PPG
58.6
Adj Opp PPG
#139
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2026-2027
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Preseason prior 942 (returning production + recruiting): last season 967, returning -41, transfers +16, freshmen +0 More โ†’ 957 (#192) Preseason prior 942 (returning production + recruiting): last season 967, returning -41, transfers +16, freshmen +0
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. HCA +169 elo More โ†’ 956 (#208) HCA +169 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +169 elo More โ†’ 956 (#209) HCA +169 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +1.7 More โ†’ +2.7 (#140) HCA +1.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +1.6 More โ†’ +2.7 (#140) HCA +1.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.854 (#75) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +16.6 More โ†’ 0.681 (#102) AdjNet +16.6
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +14.3 More โ†’ 0.658 (#111) AdjNet +14.3
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 65.0 | AdjD 58.6 More โ†’ 0.554 (#139) AdjO 65.0 | AdjD 58.6
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 65.1 | AdjD 58.6 More โ†’ 0.554 (#139) AdjO 65.1 | AdjD 58.6
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.562 (#142) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.562 (#142) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 179 | GP 3 More โ†’ 979 (#173) RD 179 | GP 3
Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. Chronological component blend with rest and venue. More โ†’ 0.511 (#154) Chronological component blend with rest and venue.

Rank through the season

League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.

Recency Ensemble Log Adjusted Elo Points Off/Def Recency

2026-2027 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-11-02 vs Texas Southern Tigers W 92 - 38
2026-11-08 vs Alabama Crimson Tide L 63 - 68
2026-11-12 vs LSU New Orleans Privateers W 101 - 61
2026-11-16 vs McNeese Cowgirls - Preview
2026-11-20 vs Alcorn State Lady Braves - Preview

2026-2027 Roster

Estimated Minutes by Position

Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Kanija Daniel Kanija Daniel G 3 26.7 13.3 6.0 2.0 1.7 0.7 1.3 14.0 8.3 39 3 13.0 20.5 31.0 17.6 84.6 0.76 41.9 34.5
Khadee Hession Khadee Hession G 3 26.7 13.0 3.0 2.7 1.3 1.0 0.7 11.3 9.0 43 3 14.3 21.5 32.4 26.7 92.9 3.16 48.6 38.2
Nataliyah Gray Nataliyah Gray F 3 14.0 12.7 4.3 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.7 7.3 10.3 20 3 6.7 21.1 59.1 100.0 84.6 -1.5 68.5 61.4
Ja'Kyah Smith Ja'Kyah Smith G 3 28.3 10.3 3.0 4.7 2.3 1.7 2.7 8.7 10.7 48 3 16.0 23.2 42.3 35.7 57.1 -1.31 53.3 51.9
Edina Strausz Edina Strausz C 3 26.7 10.0 8.7 2.3 2.3 2.0 1.0 7.3 17.0 50 3 16.7 25.6 59.1 100.0 42.9 1.05 59.8 61.4
Jayda Brown Jayda Brown G 3 18.7 10.0 3.7 2.3 0.7 0.3 1.0 7.0 9.0 41 3 13.7 30.6 57.1 62.5 25.0 -0.45 65.9 69.0
Kennedy Simpson Kennedy Simpson G 2 19.0 9.0 5.0 3.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 8.5 10.0 38 2 19.0 45.1 47.1 50.0 0 -0.87 52.9 52.9
Asha Sra Asha Sra G 3 21.0 6.0 4.0 3.7 0.3 0.0 2.3 3.0 8.7 49 3 16.3 32.1 44.4 40.0 72.7 1.06 65.0 55.6
Madison Gordon Madison Gordon F 2 13.5 3.0 3.5 2.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 2.0 7.0 25 2 12.5 37.5 75.0 0 0 -3.14 75.0 75.0
Makayla Carter Makayla Carter F 3 11.3 2.0 2.3 0.0 1.3 1.0 2.0 1.7 3.0 19 3 6.3 21.9 40.0 0.0 50.0 -1.2 44.4 40.0
Aizhanique Mayo Aizhanique Mayo G 1 15.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 -1.0 18 1 18.0 48.6 0.0 0.0 0 1.34 0.0 0.0
Shiloh Kimpson Shiloh Kimpson G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sadie Shores Sadie Shores G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2026-2027 Shot Zones

205 located field-goal attempts in 3 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Gray20% Strausz38% Smith25% Daniel50% Smith33% Smith33% Daniel50% Hession40% Brown60% Smith25%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Simpson29% Daniel31% Strausz17% Hession75% Smith20% Daniel40% Smith50% Daniel55% Hession33% Hession35%
Misses: who misses most here

Jayda BrownKanija DanielEdina StrauszJa'Kyah SmithNataliyah GrayKhadee HessionKennedy Simpson

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 45-59 76.3 90 Nataliyah Gray 20% (18 pts) Edina Strausz 16% (14 pts) Kennedy Simpson 29% (4 misses) Kanija Daniel 21% (3 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 13-45 28.9 26 Edina Strausz 38% (10 pts) Nataliyah Gray 23% (6 pts) Kanija Daniel 31% (10 misses) Edina Strausz 22% (7 misses)
Mid-range left 4-10 40.0 8 Ja'Kyah Smith 25% (2 pts) Jayda Brown 25% (2 pts) Edina Strausz 17% (1 misses) Jayda Brown 17% (1 misses)
Mid-range center 2-6 33.3 4 Kanija Daniel 50% (2 pts) Khadee Hession 50% (2 pts) Khadee Hession 75% (3 misses) Jayda Brown 25% (1 misses)
Mid-range right 3-13 23.1 6 Ja'Kyah Smith 33% (2 pts) Kanija Daniel 33% (2 pts) Ja'Kyah Smith 20% (2 misses) Kennedy Simpson 20% (2 misses)
Left corner 3 3-13 23.1 9 Ja'Kyah Smith 33% (3 pts) Kanija Daniel 33% (3 pts) Kanija Daniel 40% (4 misses) Ja'Kyah Smith 30% (3 misses)
Right corner 3 2-4 50.0 6 Kanija Daniel 50% (3 pts) Kennedy Simpson 50% (3 pts) Ja'Kyah Smith 50% (1 misses) Khadee Hession 50% (1 misses)
Above-break 3 left 5-16 31.2 15 Khadee Hession 40% (6 pts) Asha Sra 20% (3 pts) Kanija Daniel 55% (6 misses) Khadee Hession 18% (2 misses)
Above-break 3 center 5-14 35.7 15 Jayda Brown 60% (9 pts) Ja'Kyah Smith 20% (3 pts) Khadee Hession 33% (3 misses) Makayla Carter 22% (2 misses)
Above-break 3 right 8-25 32.0 24 Ja'Kyah Smith 25% (6 pts) Jayda Brown 25% (6 pts) Khadee Hession 35% (6 misses) Ja'Kyah Smith 29% (5 misses)