East Carolina Pirates
2026 Team Stats (29 games)
70.2
PPG
66.1
Opp
+4.1
Margin
38.4%
FG%
29.9%
3P%
73.2%
FT%
37.0
RPG
14.1
APG
14.9
TO
88.2
Pace
71.0
AdjO
66.2
AdjD
#112
Rank
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1086 (#128) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1124 (#106) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1037 (#146) | HCA +113 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +4.0 (#121) | HCA +2.3 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +17.0 (#107) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.731 (#98) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.759 (#95) | NetEff +8.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.697 (#115) | AdjNet +7.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.699 (#115) | AdjNet +7.3 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.608 (#112) | AdjO 71.0 | AdjD 66.2 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.590 (#137) | AdjO 66.9 | AdjD 62.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.811 (#132) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.781 (#131) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1109 (#133) | RD 131 | GP 29 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K. Fauntleroy
|
G | 29 | 32.7 | 13.5 | 3.3 | 4.9 | 2.7 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 13.5 | 8.9 | 99 | 4.1 | 5.2 | 38.5 | 29.1 | 72.9 | -0.02 | 46.4 | 43.5 |
A. Hutton
|
F | 28 | 28.5 | 10.9 | 6.8 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 9.3 | 9.6 | 103 | 4.5 | 6.7 | 41.2 | 33.3 | 72.4 | 1.43 | 49.8 | 44.0 |
T. Barner
|
G | 27 | 24.6 | 10.7 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 4.6 | 41 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 39.3 | 30.6 | 85.7 | 1.36 | 52.4 | 46.1 |
K. Rembert
|
F | 28 | 25.5 | 10.4 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 9.1 | 6.5 | 93 | 3.9 | 5.8 | 42.7 | 35.6 | 78.9 | 1.25 | 50.7 | 45.9 |
J. Hearp
|
G | 29 | 24.1 | 9.3 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 7.5 | 6.4 | 72 | 2.9 | 4.8 | 40.4 | 33.7 | 73.3 | 0.96 | 53.0 | 47.7 |
S. Brooks
|
G | 28 | 28.2 | 8.5 | 4.1 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 7.3 | 8.0 | 89 | 3.9 | 5.6 | 34.3 | 28.2 | 81.1 | 3.75 | 48.6 | 40.2 |
B. Smith
|
G | 26 | 11.8 | 2.8 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 134 | 5.8 | 22.8 | 43.3 | 16.7 | 70.4 | 2.31 | 50.1 | 44.2 |
Z. Zellous
|
F | 29 | 12.1 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 3.2 | 3.1 | -74 | -3.1 | -8.7 | 33.7 | 14.3 | 48.6 | -4.67 | 37.4 | 34.2 |
O. Hilliard
|
G | 28 | 10.9 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 0.0 | -22 | -1.0 | -2.8 | 22.8 | 5.3 | 61.1 | -1.87 | 27.6 | 23.4 |
A. Shaw
|
F | 8 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 49 | 2.6 | 9.8 | 66.7 | 100.0 | 66.7 | 0.53 | 75.2 | 75.0 |
M. Dibua
|
F | 28 | 9.8 | 1.4 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 28.6 | 25.0 | 40.9 | -0.52 | 32.4 | 29.6 |
C. Iloanya
|
F | 2 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -4 | -1.3 | -30.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.79 | 0 | 0 |
A. Smith
|
G | 2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 60 | 4.6 | 9.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.23 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG