๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

UAB Blazers

2026-2027 Team Stats (2 games)

80.0
PPG
53.0
Opp
+27.0
Margin
45.5%
FG%
32.3%
3P%
67.8%
FT%
47.0
RPG
11.0
APG
18.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
63.5
Adj PPG
57.0
Adj Opp PPG
#263
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2026-2027
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. Preseason prior 759 (returning production + recruiting): last season 892, returning -80, transfers -52, freshmen +0 More โ†’ 806 (#282) Preseason prior 759 (returning production + recruiting): last season 892, returning -80, transfers -52, freshmen +0
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. HCA +169 elo More โ†’ 828 (#320) HCA +169 elo
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +169 elo More โ†’ 831 (#318) HCA +169 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +1.7 More โ†’ -10.9 (#270) HCA +1.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +1.6 More โ†’ -10.9 (#271) HCA +1.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.254 (#224) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +1.4 More โ†’ 0.300 (#256) AdjNet +1.4
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +2.0 More โ†’ 0.306 (#249) AdjNet +2.0
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 63.5 | AdjD 57.0 More โ†’ 0.333 (#263) AdjO 63.5 | AdjD 57.0
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 63.5 | AdjD 57.0 More โ†’ 0.336 (#262) AdjO 63.5 | AdjD 57.0
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.272 (#282) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.272 (#282) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 220 | GP 1 More โ†’ 836 (#291) RD 220 | GP 1
Adjusted Context Blend Adjusted Context Blend Chronologically trained component blend with rest and signed venue context. Chronological component blend with rest and venue. More โ†’ 0.194 (#306) Chronological component blend with rest and venue.

Rank through the season

League rank each week from the model's fit of the games played by then, published the same way as the table above, so each line ends at the rank shown there. Select a point for its rating.

Recency Ensemble Log Adjusted Elo Points Off/Def Recency

2026-2027 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-11-04 vs Fisk Bulldogs W 77 - 67
2026-11-07 @ South Alabama Jaguars W 73 - 59
2026-11-11 vs Stillman Tigers W 87 - 47
2026-11-19 @ Alabama A&M Bulldogs - Preview

2026-2027 Roster

Estimated Minutes by Position

Estimated from roster positions, box scores and minutes played. Each column totals one game's minutes, divided among the players. Use the labels or legend to highlight a player's estimated role.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Peyton Bradley Peyton Bradley G 1 18.0 13.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 9.0 10.0 - - - - 55.6 42.9 0 - 72.2 72.2
Hailey Jackson Hailey Jackson F 1 18.0 13.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 10.0 7.0 - - - - 50.0 0.0 50.0 - 51.4 50.0
Nya Burns Nya Burns G 1 24.0 12.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 9.0 - - - - 57.1 50.0 100.0 - 76.1 71.4
Terryauna Griffin Terryauna Griffin G 1 16.0 11.0 5.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 7.0 12.0 17 1 17.0 42.4 57.1 50.0 50.0 0.67 62.8 64.3
Bella Harmon Bella Harmon G 1 14.0 10.0 8.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 6.0 11.0 - - - - 66.7 0 66.7 - 68.3 66.7
Ashley Garner Ashley Garner F 1 19.0 8.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 13.0 - - - - 100.0 0 0 - 100.0 100.0
Serena Heeren Serena Heeren F 1 16.0 6.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 5.0 5.0 - - - - 40.0 0 50.0 - 44.4 40.0
Viktoria Ranisavljevic Viktoria Ranisavljevic G 1 22.0 5.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 4.0 2.0 - - - - 50.0 0.0 50.0 - 51.2 50.0
Eleecia Carter Eleecia Carter G 1 18.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 31 3 10.3 17.3 14.3 0.0 66.7 0.34 24.0 14.3
Mari Miller Mari Miller G 1 20.0 4.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 18 3 6.0 20.9 28.6 0.0 0 -2.45 28.6 28.6
Emilia Dannebauer Emilia Dannebauer F 1 15.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 - - - - 0.0 0 50.0 - 10.2 0.0
Ashlyn Howard Ashlyn Howard F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2026-2027 Shot Zones

70 located field-goal attempts in 1 game (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Jackson25% Harmon25% Burns100% Bradley50% Griffin100% Bradley100% Burns100% Bradley67%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Dannebauer25% Miller50% Miller50% Ranisavljevic100% Griffin100% Carter43% Burns100% Bradley40%
Misses: who misses most here

Peyton BradleyHailey JacksonNya BurnsTerryauna GriffinBella HarmonMari MillerViktoria RanisavljevicEleecia CarterEmilia Dannebauer

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 20-36 55.6 40 Hailey Jackson 25% (10 pts) Ashley Garner 20% (8 pts) Emilia Dannebauer 25% (4 misses) Hailey Jackson 25% (4 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 4-8 50.0 8 Bella Harmon 25% (2 pts) Mari Miller 25% (2 pts) Mari Miller 50% (2 misses) Nya Burns 25% (1 misses)
Mid-range left 0-0 - 0 - - - -
Mid-range center 1-1 100.0 2 Nya Burns 100% (2 pts) - - -
Mid-range right 2-4 50.0 4 Peyton Bradley 50% (2 pts) Terryauna Griffin 50% (2 pts) Mari Miller 50% (1 misses) Terryauna Griffin 50% (1 misses)
Left corner 3 1-2 50.0 3 Terryauna Griffin 100% (3 pts) - Viktoria Ranisavljevic 100% (1 misses) -
Right corner 3 0-1 0.0 0 - - Terryauna Griffin 100% (1 misses) -
Above-break 3 left 1-8 12.5 3 Peyton Bradley 100% (3 pts) - Eleecia Carter 43% (3 misses) Peyton Bradley 29% (2 misses)
Above-break 3 center 1-2 50.0 3 Nya Burns 100% (3 pts) - Nya Burns 100% (1 misses) -
Above-break 3 right 3-8 37.5 9 Peyton Bradley 67% (6 pts) Nya Burns 33% (3 pts) Peyton Bradley 40% (2 misses) Eleecia Carter 20% (1 misses)