🐻⬇️🏀

Temple Owls

Also known as: Temple Owls
Program History

2026 Team Stats (27 games)

67.2
PPG
67.4
Opp
-0.2
Margin
39.0%
FG%
33.1%
3P%
70.8%
FT%
38.7
RPG
13.3
APG
16.7
TO
86.6
Pace
70.3
AdjO
66.8
AdjD
#126
Rank

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 954 (#214) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1033 (#157) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +113 elo More → 992 (#367) HCA +113 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.3 More → +3.5 (#126) HCA +2.3
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.8 More → +14.7 (#140) HCA +2.8
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.459 (#186) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -1.3 More → 0.459 (#182) NetEff -1.3
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +5.3 More → 0.649 (#126) AdjNet +5.3
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +5.4 More → 0.652 (#126) AdjNet +5.4
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 70.3 | AdjD 66.8 More → 0.579 (#126) AdjO 70.3 | AdjD 66.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 66.6 | AdjD 65.0 More → 0.537 (#184) AdjO 66.6 | AdjD 65.0
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.773 (#151) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.733 (#155) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 132 | GP 27 More → 1024 (#199) RD 132 | GP 27

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-07 vs George Washington Revolutionaries W 86 - 50
2025-11-11 @ West Virginia Mountaineers L 61 - 89
2025-11-14 vs La Salle Explorers W 75 - 54
2025-11-28 vs Michigan State Spartans L 50 - 85
2025-11-30 @ Western Carolina Catamounts W 84 - 64
2025-12-07 vs Drexel Dragons L 52 - 59
2025-12-19 vs Coppin State Eagles W 59 - 39
2025-12-22 @ Princeton Tigers L 77 - 87
2026-01-03 vs UTSA Roadrunners L 47 - 50
2026-01-06 @ Wichita State Shockers W 70 - 50
2026-01-09 @ Tulsa Golden Hurricane L 82 - 94
2026-01-17 @ East Carolina Pirates L 65 - 81
2026-01-20 vs South Florida Bulls W 86 - 83
2026-01-24 vs Charlotte 49ers W 83 - 82
2026-01-28 @ Rice Owls L 56 - 65
2026-01-31 @ Tulane Green Wave W 67 - 65
2026-02-07 vs North Texas Mean Green L 66 - 69
2026-02-10 @ UTSA Roadrunners L 43 - 52
2026-02-14 vs East Carolina Pirates L 73 - 79
2026-02-17 @ Charlotte 49ers W 58 - 54
2026-02-22 vs Memphis Tigers W 65 - 62
2026-02-22 vs Memphis Tigers - Preview
2026-02-25 vs Rice Owls L 66 - 77
2026-02-28 @ UAB Blazers W 86 - 57
2026-03-03 @ South Florida Bulls L 36 - 82
2026-03-07 vs Florida Atlantic Owls W 84 - 56
2026-03-10 vs Tulane Green Wave W 86 - 77
2026-03-11 @ UTSA Roadrunners L 51 - 59

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
K. Turner K. Turner G 27 33.4 16.6 3.4 2.6 1.7 0.1 2.9 14.6 6.7 1 0.0 0.1 41.0 42.8 74.6 4.02 52.6 50.0
S. Craig S. Craig F 27 28.3 11.0 7.9 1.6 1.3 0.3 2.1 9.5 10.4 -7 -0.3 -0.5 42.4 11.1 61.9 2.38 47.5 42.6
T. Taylor T. Taylor G 24 31.4 9.7 3.0 4.0 0.9 0.1 2.0 8.3 7.3 32 1.5 2.6 36.0 32.2 80.2 1.48 48.8 40.8
J. Molina J. Molina F 26 29.1 9.5 6.8 1.5 1.8 0.5 3.2 7.7 9.2 -25 -1.1 -1.7 49.2 28.2 68.4 0.22 54.9 52.0
S. Curry S. Curry G 24 25.9 7.3 3.7 1.6 1.9 0.0 1.8 7.9 4.9 21 1.2 1.8 32.8 27.5 91.4 1.88 42.8 37.8
D. Alexander D. Alexander G 26 14.7 4.9 2.2 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.7 5.3 2.2 -25 -2.3 -7.8 31.9 29.5 80.0 0.27 44.3 42.0
B. Mead B. Mead G 26 12.5 3.0 1.0 1.1 0.3 0.0 1.1 3.4 0.9 -27 -1.3 -4.3 31.5 28.6 75.0 -0.92 41.9 39.3
K. Cedano K. Cedano G 26 11.8 2.9 1.7 0.4 0.7 0.0 1.0 3.0 1.8 18 0.8 2.8 35.4 25.0 59.1 1.53 42.9 39.9
A. Meriedy A. Meriedy F 21 7.2 2.6 1.5 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.6 2.7 1.7 10 0.7 7.1 42.9 50.0 30.8 0.49 44.6 45.5
K. Miller K. Miller F 16 6.3 2.5 1.4 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.8 2.0 1.5 16 0.7 2.6 43.8 20.0 84.6 1.96 53.0 45.3
F. Jacobs F. Jacobs F 27 14.3 1.4 3.8 0.7 0.3 0.1 1.1 1.7 3.5 -80 -3.6 -8.6 29.8 0 62.5 -3.36 35.2 29.8
Sheyenne Swain-Price Sheyenne Swain-Price F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Anastasia Bulanova Anastasia Bulanova F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG