New Mexico Lobos
2013 Team Stats (25 games)
66.6
PPG
60.6
Opp
+6.7
Margin
42.7%
FG%
35.3%
3P%
69.1%
FT%
34.5
RPG
14.6
APG
11.1
TO
73.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2012-2013
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1629 (#37) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1372 (#103) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1119 (#38) | HCA +147 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +30.6 (#80) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +17.1 (#66) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.803 (#11) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.740 (#48) | NetEff +8.9 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.821 (#19) | AdjNet +13.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.830 (#19) | AdjNet +13.9 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.669 (#48) | AdjO 66.5 | AdjD 58.8 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.887 (#34) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.866 (#34) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1369 (#9) | RD 114 | GP 35 |
2013 Schedule & Results
2013 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K. Williams
|
G | 34 | 34.4 | 13.3 | 3.5 | 4.9 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 7.4 | 13.4 | 210 | 6.2 | 7.9 | 41.4 | 36.3 | 75.9 | 1.72 | 70.7 | 49.6 |
T. Snell
|
G | 35 | 31.2 | 12.5 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 7.9 | 9.3 | - | - | - | 42.4 | 38.2 | 82.1 | 1.54 | 70.1 | 51.4 |
A. Kirk
|
C | 35 | 29.1 | 12.1 | 8.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 7.6 | 13.9 | 183 | 5.2 | 8.2 | 49.4 | 31.6 | 70.3 | 1.6 | 67.1 | 51.7 |
C. Bairstow
|
F | 35 | 24.1 | 9.7 | 5.9 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 5.5 | 11.1 | - | - | - | 48.5 | 0 | 69.9 | 1.68 | 67.3 | 48.5 |
H. Greenwood
|
G | 35 | 28.5 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 4.8 | 10.1 | 190 | 5.4 | 9.4 | 41.1 | 36.0 | 56.8 | 1.46 | 66.2 | 50.6 |
M. Walker
|
G | 23 | 15.4 | 5.0 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 3.7 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 37.2 | 43.9 | 66.7 | 0.17 | 58.0 | 47.7 |
C. Adams
|
G-F | 34 | 19.7 | 4.5 | 3.2 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 3.1 | 5.3 | 90 | 2.6 | 5.2 | 44.2 | 48.4 | 63.3 | 0.24 | 65.3 | 51.4 |
J. Fenton
|
G | 32 | 14.5 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 47 | 1.5 | 3.3 | 34.0 | 31.0 | 48.6 | 0.02 | 54.9 | 43.6 |
P. Thomas
|
G | 34 | 6.4 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 0.0 | 77.8 | -0.33 | 59.5 | 41.7 |
C. Perez
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -13 | -0.4 | -0.6 | 0 | 0 | 50.0 | -0.04 | 56.8 | 0 |
N. Banyard
|
F | 30 | 6.4 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.2 | -26 | -0.9 | -3.6 | 20.0 | 14.3 | 45.0 | -0.54 | 33.5 | 21.7 |
K. Alford
|
G | 10 | 3.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 4 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.08 | 10.2 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG