Michigan State
2012 Team Stats (25 games)
70.1
PPG
59.3
Opp
+12.3
Margin
47.9%
FG%
37.0%
3P%
71.0%
FT%
36.6
RPG
14.8
APG
12.5
TO
74.3
Pace
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1884 (#6) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1617 (#10) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +40.1 (#9) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.828 (#7) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.863 (#18) | NetEff +15.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.917 (#5) | AdjNet +21.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.920 (#5) | AdjNet +21.3 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D. Green
|
F | 37 | 33.2 | 16.2 | 10.6 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 9.7 | 20.4 | 24 | 2.0 | 5.8 | 46.4 | 42.7 | 73.2 | 0.82 | 71.8 | 52.9 |
K. Appling
|
G | 37 | 30.8 | 11.4 | 2.9 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 6.8 | 10.5 | - | - | - | 40.3 | 22.7 | 77.8 | - | 66.4 | 43.7 |
B. Wood
|
G | 37 | 26.9 | 8.8 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 5.4 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 43.9 | 34.6 | 61.1 | - | 76.0 | 53.0 |
B. Dawson
|
F | 31 | 20.6 | 8.4 | 4.5 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 4.9 | 9.3 | - | - | - | 59.6 | 0.0 | 57.4 | - | 72.8 | 59.6 |
D. Nix
|
F | 37 | 18.9 | 8.1 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 4.8 | 7.8 | - | - | - | 56.4 | 0 | 57.6 | 0.64 | 73.4 | 56.4 |
A. Payne
|
C | 37 | 17.9 | 7.0 | 4.2 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 3.5 | 8.8 | - | - | - | 55.0 | 50.0 | 68.6 | - | 81.0 | 55.4 |
A. Thornton
|
G | 37 | 21.8 | 5.2 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 7.4 | - | - | - | 49.4 | 50.0 | 88.7 | - | 89.1 | 62.4 |
T. Trice II
|
G | 32 | 17.2 | 4.5 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 5.0 | 29 | 4.8 | 3.1 | 36.0 | 37.3 | 55.0 | 0.73 | 74.1 | 46.6 |
A. Gauna
|
F | 30 | 4.7 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.4 | - | - | - | 55.6 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 78.8 | 55.6 |
R. Byrd
|
G | 27 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 22.2 | 22.7 | 71.4 | - | 68.2 | 31.5 |
B. Kearney
|
G | 34 | 9.6 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.9 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 45.5 | 0.0 | - | 75.0 | 59.6 |
K. Wetzel
|
G | 10 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | - | 69.4 | 75.0 |
A. Ianni
|
C | 19 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 52.1 | 0.0 |
J. Sweeny
|
G | 9 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 0.0 |
D. Chapman
|
G | 14 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
C. Wollenman
|
F | 8 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | -0.2 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG