Indiana Pacers
2009 Team Stats (76 games)
105.1
PPG
105.6
Opp
-0.5
Margin
45.6%
FG%
37.8%
3P%
81.4%
FT%
43.7
RPG
21.5
APG
13.9
TO
98.8
Est. poss./game
104.1
Adj PPG
104.9
Adj Opp PPG
#18
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2008-2009
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1026 (#14) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 959 (#18) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 993 (#14) | HCA +102 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | -0.8 (#18) | HCA +3.3 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +0.1 (#14) | HCA +3.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.470 (#17) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.484 (#17) | NetEff -0.6 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.481 (#17) | AdjNet -0.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.481 (#17) | AdjNet -0.7 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.483 (#18) | AdjO 104.1 | AdjD 104.9 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.503 (#14) | AdjO 104.5 | AdjD 104.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.498 (#14) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.502 (#14) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 986 (#17) | RD 247 | GP 82 |
2009 Schedule & Results
2009 Roster
Counting stats use played regular-season games. PM and RAPM use their separate model samples; PM GP shows that sample's game count.
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danny Granger | G | 62 | 35.9 | 25.7 | 5.0 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 18.8 | 14.6 | - | - | - | - | 44.9 | 40.2 | 88.3 | - | 58.8 | 52.1 |
| T.J. Ford | G | 69 | 30.7 | 15.3 | 3.7 | 5.4 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 12.6 | 10.7 | - | - | - | - | 45.7 | 34.0 | 88.0 | - | 53.7 | 47.6 |
Mike Dunleavy
|
G | 17 | 27.2 | 14.8 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 12.8 | 7.4 | - | - | - | - | 39.2 | 34.5 | 82.5 | - | 51.3 | 45.9 |
| Troy Murphy | G | 68 | 33.9 | 14.3 | 11.8 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 10.6 | 17.5 | - | - | - | - | 47.8 | 45.3 | 81.2 | - | 61.4 | 58.3 |
Marquis Daniels
|
G | 50 | 32.0 | 13.7 | 4.7 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 13.0 | 7.4 | - | - | - | - | 44.7 | 19.3 | 73.2 | - | 48.9 | 46.0 |
Jarrett Jack
|
G | 76 | 33.4 | 13.0 | 3.5 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 2.3 | 10.4 | 9.3 | - | - | - | - | 44.7 | 35.4 | 85.8 | - | 55.2 | 49.4 |
| Brandon Rush | G | 70 | 23.6 | 8.2 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 7.6 | 4.5 | - | - | - | - | 43.3 | 37.8 | 72.4 | - | 51.5 | 50.0 |
| Roy Hibbert | G | 65 | 14.2 | 7.0 | 3.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 5.9 | 5.8 | - | - | - | - | 46.6 | 0 | 69.1 | - | 51.0 | 46.6 |
| Rasho Nesterovic | G | 65 | 17.4 | 6.7 | 3.5 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 6.2 | 5.6 | - | - | - | - | 51.9 | 0.0 | 78.6 | - | 53.0 | 51.9 |
| Jeff Foster | G | 68 | 24.7 | 6.0 | 6.8 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 4.7 | 10.1 | - | - | - | - | 50.6 | 33.3 | 64.4 | - | 54.4 | 50.9 |
| Stephen Graham | G | 47 | 12.9 | 5.3 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 4.7 | 2.5 | - | - | - | - | 42.7 | 32.1 | 81.5 | - | 51.3 | 46.8 |
| Travis Diener | G | 51 | 12.9 | 3.6 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 3.2 | 4.3 | - | - | - | - | 41.1 | 38.7 | 84.6 | - | 55.1 | 53.7 |
| Josh McRoberts | G | 29 | 8.7 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 3.1 | - | - | - | - | 42.3 | 0.0 | 88.9 | - | 45.1 | 42.3 |
| Maceo Baston | G | 25 | 7.5 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 3.0 | - | - | - | - | 56.4 | 0 | 64.0 | - | 60.0 | 56.4 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG