Northern Arizona Lumberjacks
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 943 (#747) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1126 (#302) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +13.0 (#374) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.075 (#112) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.022 (#117) | AdjNet -32.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.022 (#117) | AdjNet -33.1 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Douglas
|
G | 24 | 29.6 | 12.3 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 14.3 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 25.0 | 71.4 | - | 349.9 | 30.6 |
G. Rogers
|
G | 14 | 28.8 | 10.1 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 4.7 | 7.2 | - | - | - | 34.8 | 33.3 | 100.0 | - | 102.7 | 41.7 |
D. Norman
|
G | 25 | 26.6 | 9.8 | 6.0 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 15.1 | - | - | - | 52.5 | 60.0 | 73.9 | - | 244.4 | 56.2 |
S. Saldivar
|
G | 25 | 31.8 | 6.8 | 3.6 | 5.1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 12.7 | - | - | - | 36.6 | 26.7 | 100.0 | - | 203.0 | 41.5 |
M. Dunn
|
G | 25 | 23.2 | 6.3 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 9.3 | - | - | - | 51.5 | 50.0 | 69.2 | - | 204.0 | 63.6 |
G. Bewernick
|
F | 25 | 22.0 | 6.3 | 5.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 11.2 | - | - | - | 59.3 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 274.7 | 59.3 |
E. Ekanem
|
F | 24 | 16.6 | 5.1 | 3.6 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 55.6 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 195.9 | 55.6 |
C. Gruber
|
F | 23 | 13.0 | 4.3 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 4.9 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 27.3 | 100.0 | - | 245.0 | 41.7 |
M. Jacobsen
|
F | 15 | 11.0 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 3.5 | - | - | - | 46.2 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 135.5 | 46.2 |
D. Cheek
|
- | 16 | 7.9 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 2.9 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 292.9 | 0.0 |
B. Olayinka
|
F | 20 | 8.7 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 3.5 | - | - | - | 43.8 | 0 | 63.6 | - | 105.6 | 43.8 |
L. Flores
|
G | 20 | 6.8 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.3 | - | - | - | 22.2 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 150.0 | 22.2 |
C. Heine
|
G | 3 | 4.0 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.3 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 200.0 | 100.0 |
C. Weaver
|
- | 3 | 4.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 2.7 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.07 | 150.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG