๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Michigan

Also known as: Michigan Wolverines, Michigan
Program History

2012 Team Stats (28 games)

65.6
PPG
60.4
Opp
+5.2
Margin
44.9%
FG%
35.7%
3P%
73.3%
FT%
30.4
RPG
13.0
APG
10.4
TO
-
Est. poss./game
68.7
Adj PPG
57.4
Adj Opp PPG
#31
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2011-2012
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 1281 (#36) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 1289 (#15) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +101 elo More โ†’ 1095 (#57) HCA +101 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.2 More โ†’ +12.4 (#31) HCA +3.2
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.2 More โ†’ +10.7 (#37) HCA +3.2
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.680 (#86) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +19.8 More โ†’ 0.907 (#30) AdjNet +19.8
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +20.0 More โ†’ 0.910 (#30) AdjNet +20.0
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 68.7 | AdjD 57.4 More โ†’ 0.738 (#31) AdjO 68.7 | AdjD 57.4
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 65.5 | AdjD 59.4 More โ†’ 0.635 (#58) AdjO 65.5 | AdjD 59.4
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.791 (#31) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.775 (#34) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 108 | GP 33 More โ†’ 1259 (#26) RD 108 | GP 33

2012 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2011-11-11 vs Ferris State Bulldogs W 59 - 33
2011-11-14 vs Towson Tigers W 64 - 47
2011-11-17 vs Western Illinois Leathernecks W 59 - 55
2011-11-21 @ Memphis Tigers W 73 - 61
2011-11-22 @ Duke Blue Devils L 75 - 82
2011-11-23 @ UCLA Bruins W 79 - 63
2011-11-29 @ Virginia Cavaliers L 58 - 70
2011-12-03 vs Iowa State Cyclones W 76 - 66
2011-12-10 @ Oakland Golden Grizzlies W 90 - 80
2011-12-13 vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff Golden Lions W 63 - 50
2011-12-17 vs Alabama A&M Bulldogs W 87 - 57
2011-12-22 vs Bradley Braves W 77 - 66
2011-12-29 vs Penn State Nittany Lions W 71 - 53
2012-01-01 vs Minnesota Golden Gophers W 61 - 56
2012-01-05 @ Indiana Hoosiers L 71 - 73
2012-01-08 vs Wisconsin Badgers W 59 - 41
2012-01-11 vs Northwestern Wildcats W 66 - 64
2012-01-14 @ Iowa Hawkeyes L 59 - 75
2012-01-17 vs Michigan State Spartans W 60 - 59
2012-01-21 @ Arkansas Razorbacks L 64 - 66
2012-01-24 @ Purdue Boilermakers W 66 - 64
2012-01-29 @ Ohio State Buckeyes L 49 - 64
2012-02-01 vs Indiana Hoosiers W 68 - 56
2012-02-05 @ Michigan State Spartans L 54 - 64
2012-02-08 @ Nebraska Cornhuskers W 62 - 46
2012-02-12 vs Illinois Fighting Illini W 70 - 61
2012-02-18 vs Ohio State Buckeyes W 56 - 51
2012-02-21 @ Northwestern Wildcats W 67 - 55
2012-02-25 vs Purdue Boilermakers L 61 - 75
2012-03-01 @ Illinois Fighting Illini W 72 - 61
2012-03-04 @ Penn State Nittany Lions W 71 - 65
2012-03-09 vs Minnesota Golden Gophers W 73 - 69
2012-03-10 vs Ohio State Buckeyes L 55 - 77
2012-03-16 vs Ohio Bobcats L 60 - 65

2012 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Trey Burke Trey Burke G 34 36.1 14.8 3.5 4.6 0.9 0.4 2.8 10.9 10.6 38 24 1.6 1.8 42.8 34.9 75.0 1.36 60.2 49.7
T. Hardaway Jr. T. Hardaway Jr. G 34 34.2 14.6 3.8 2.1 0.5 0.3 1.9 10.3 9.1 56 24 2.3 2.8 41.0 28.4 71.7 2.12 60.8 47.9
Zack Novak Zack Novak G-F 34 33.7 9.2 4.5 1.8 0.8 0.1 1.0 6.0 9.4 36 24 1.5 1.9 46.1 38.9 87.8 1.95 70.7 56.9
Evan Smotrycz Evan Smotrycz F 34 21.1 7.7 4.9 0.9 0.8 0.3 1.4 4.7 8.5 12 24 0.5 1.1 50.0 46.9 76.9 -0.24 71.9 61.9
Stu Douglass Stu Douglass G 34 30.5 7.5 2.6 2.3 0.8 0.1 1.0 5.9 6.3 33 24 1.4 1.9 41.6 34.6 81.5 2.94 59.8 52.7
Jordan Morgan Jordan Morgan F 34 24.4 7.3 5.6 0.3 0.6 0.3 1.6 4.9 7.8 58 24 2.4 4.0 63.0 0 54.3 1.75 67.2 63.0
Jon Horford Jon Horford C 9 10.8 2.7 3.6 0.1 0.3 1.0 0.6 0.9 6.2 4 6 0.7 3.0 25.0 0 100.0 -1.0 123.0 25.0
Matt Vogrich Matt Vogrich G 34 10.7 2.3 1.3 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.3 2.0 2.1 -44 24 -1.8 -7.8 37.3 32.7 50.0 -3.74 56.7 49.3
Eso Akunne Eso Akunne G 12 4.0 1.7 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.6 1.5 1 7 0.1 2.2 85.7 80.0 100.0 0.07 126.9 114.3
Corey Person Corey Person G 10 1.1 1.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.8 -3 5 -0.6 -14.5 50.0 0.0 0 -1.17 137.5 50.0
Blake McLimans Blake McLimans C 29 4.4 0.9 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.7 1.1 -4 20 -0.2 -2.0 52.6 50.0 0 -0.25 65.8 65.8
Colton Christian Colton Christian F 19 2.7 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.2 -17 12 -1.4 -24.5 30.0 0 0.0 -2.53 32.2 30.0
Carlton Brundidge Carlton Brundidge G 15 2.9 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.5 8 8 1.0 15.9 25.0 0.0 33.3 0.36 56.4 25.0
Josh Bartelstein Josh Bartelstein G 11 1.3 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 -3 5 -0.6 -15.5 0.0 0.0 0 -1.2 75.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG