🐻⬇️🏀

Purdue Boilermakers

Also known as: Purdue Boilermakers
Program History

2026 Team Stats (27 games)

68.3
PPG
73.7
Opp
-5.4
Margin
42.2%
FG%
32.3%
3P%
73.6%
FT%
34.0
RPG
15.0
APG
15.6
TO
82.1
Pace
72.8
AdjO
61.2
AdjD
#65
Rank

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 994 (#191) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1084 (#124) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +113 elo More → 971 (#453) HCA +113 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.3 More → +12.2 (#64) HCA +2.3
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.8 More → +20.3 (#88) HCA +2.8
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.405 (#207) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -1.6 More → 0.453 (#183) NetEff -1.6
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +18.0 More → 0.889 (#65) AdjNet +18.0
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +18.5 More → 0.897 (#64) AdjNet +18.5
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 72.8 | AdjD 61.2 More → 0.742 (#65) AdjO 72.8 | AdjD 61.2
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 66.6 | AdjD 66.7 More → 0.499 (#216) AdjO 66.6 | AdjD 66.7
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.840 (#108) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.786 (#127) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 158 | GP 27 More → 1041 (#184) RD 158 | GP 27

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-06 vs Eastern Illinois Panthers W 82 - 67
2025-11-12 @ Purdue Fort Wayne Mastodons L 67 - 68
2025-11-18 @ Kentucky Wildcats L 35 - 76
2025-11-26 vs Howard Bison W 92 - 62
2025-11-30 @ Central Michigan Chippewas L 55 - 57
2025-12-03 vs Evansville Purple Aces W 91 - 49
2025-12-07 @ Michigan Wolverines L 56 - 104
2025-12-11 vs Lipscomb Bisons W 88 - 45
2025-12-14 vs Dayton Flyers W 80 - 43
2025-12-28 vs Illinois Fighting Illini L 73 - 83
2025-12-31 vs Ohio State Buckeyes L 56 - 83
2026-01-04 @ Nebraska Cornhuskers L 62 - 78
2026-01-08 @ Wisconsin Badgers W 75 - 67
2026-01-11 vs Washington Huskies W 78 - 72
2026-01-18 @ USC Trojans L 57 - 83
2026-01-21 @ UCLA Bruins L 48 - 96
2026-01-25 vs Indiana Hoosiers W 80 - 69
2026-01-29 vs Michigan State Spartans L 65 - 86
2026-02-01 @ Minnesota Golden Gophers L 55 - 88
2026-02-04 vs Penn State Lady Lions L 82 - 85
2026-02-08 @ Indiana Hoosiers L 59 - 74
2026-02-14 vs Rutgers Scarlet Knights W 72 - 57
2026-02-19 vs Iowa Hawkeyes L 74 - 83
2026-02-22 @ Maryland Terrapins L 66 - 99
2026-02-25 vs Oregon Ducks L 65 - 71
2026-03-01 @ Northwestern Wildcats W 67 - 62
2026-03-04 @ Oregon Ducks L 64 - 82

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
T. Daye T. Daye G 27 29.3 12.3 6.8 2.5 1.2 0.3 2.5 9.9 10.6 11 0.5 0.7 45.9 33.3 75.3 1.28 53.4 48.3
K. Smith K. Smith G 27 26.6 10.3 2.1 2.3 1.3 0.1 1.7 9.6 4.9 79 4.2 4.9 38.2 32.6 84.4 2.95 50.0 46.5
M. Layden-Zay M. Layden-Zay G 22 34.6 9.5 3.5 3.3 1.6 0.4 2.3 9.1 7.0 57 2.5 3.3 33.5 31.9 86.1 1.48 48.4 44.5
N. Smith N. Smith G 27 25.5 8.3 3.4 2.3 1.0 0.2 1.7 8.6 4.8 -105 -4.6 -9.5 34.5 27.4 84.2 -5.31 45.0 41.4
L. McCarthy L. McCarthy F 24 16.8 7.6 4.5 0.8 0.7 0.6 2.3 5.8 6.1 83 4.0 9.4 57.6 0.0 56.4 2.78 58.3 57.6
K. Puryear K. Puryear F 27 16.1 6.9 3.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 1.2 5.2 5.1 -45 -2.0 -4.9 54.6 0 60.4 -0.56 56.6 54.6
H. Karsh H. Karsh G 27 25.1 6.8 1.8 2.2 0.7 0.0 1.6 7.3 2.7 38 1.7 2.5 35.5 32.0 91.7 1.88 45.2 43.7
T. Feldman T. Feldman G 5 17.2 5.6 2.4 1.4 0.0 0.4 1.6 6.0 2.2 16 2.3 3.9 30.0 35.7 83.3 1.46 42.9 38.3
A. Gordon A. Gordon F 25 9.0 5.0 2.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.4 3.7 4.1 10 0.5 1.1 54.8 0 62.9 0.52 57.2 54.8
M. Layden M. Layden G 26 17.9 2.9 2.2 1.3 0.6 0.1 1.3 2.0 3.7 2 0.1 0.3 46.2 44.9 71.4 1.25 68.1 67.3
C. Barrett C. Barrett G 4 1.5 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 5 1.2 35.2 66.7 50.0 0 1.02 83.3 83.3
S. Stahl S. Stahl F 21 9.1 0.8 2.3 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.8 2.4 23 1.3 4.0 35.3 0.0 71.4 1.84 42.3 35.3
T. Henderson T. Henderson G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - 98 4.5 17.1 - - - 2.21 - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG