Purdue Boilermakers
2026 Team Stats (27 games)
68.3
PPG
73.7
Opp
-5.4
Margin
42.2%
FG%
32.3%
3P%
73.6%
FT%
34.0
RPG
15.0
APG
15.6
TO
82.1
Pace
72.8
AdjO
61.2
AdjD
#65
Rank
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 994 (#191) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1084 (#124) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 971 (#453) | HCA +113 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +12.2 (#64) | HCA +2.3 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +20.3 (#88) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.405 (#207) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.453 (#183) | NetEff -1.6 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.889 (#65) | AdjNet +18.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.897 (#64) | AdjNet +18.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.742 (#65) | AdjO 72.8 | AdjD 61.2 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.499 (#216) | AdjO 66.6 | AdjD 66.7 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.840 (#108) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.786 (#127) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1041 (#184) | RD 158 | GP 27 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T. Daye
|
G | 27 | 29.3 | 12.3 | 6.8 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 9.9 | 10.6 | 11 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 45.9 | 33.3 | 75.3 | 1.28 | 53.4 | 48.3 |
K. Smith
|
G | 27 | 26.6 | 10.3 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 9.6 | 4.9 | 79 | 4.2 | 4.9 | 38.2 | 32.6 | 84.4 | 2.95 | 50.0 | 46.5 |
M. Layden-Zay
|
G | 22 | 34.6 | 9.5 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 9.1 | 7.0 | 57 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 33.5 | 31.9 | 86.1 | 1.48 | 48.4 | 44.5 |
N. Smith
|
G | 27 | 25.5 | 8.3 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 8.6 | 4.8 | -105 | -4.6 | -9.5 | 34.5 | 27.4 | 84.2 | -5.31 | 45.0 | 41.4 |
L. McCarthy
|
F | 24 | 16.8 | 7.6 | 4.5 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 5.8 | 6.1 | 83 | 4.0 | 9.4 | 57.6 | 0.0 | 56.4 | 2.78 | 58.3 | 57.6 |
K. Puryear
|
F | 27 | 16.1 | 6.9 | 3.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 5.2 | 5.1 | -45 | -2.0 | -4.9 | 54.6 | 0 | 60.4 | -0.56 | 56.6 | 54.6 |
H. Karsh
|
G | 27 | 25.1 | 6.8 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 7.3 | 2.7 | 38 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 35.5 | 32.0 | 91.7 | 1.88 | 45.2 | 43.7 |
T. Feldman
|
G | 5 | 17.2 | 5.6 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 6.0 | 2.2 | 16 | 2.3 | 3.9 | 30.0 | 35.7 | 83.3 | 1.46 | 42.9 | 38.3 |
A. Gordon
|
F | 25 | 9.0 | 5.0 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 3.7 | 4.1 | 10 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 54.8 | 0 | 62.9 | 0.52 | 57.2 | 54.8 |
M. Layden
|
G | 26 | 17.9 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 3.7 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 46.2 | 44.9 | 71.4 | 1.25 | 68.1 | 67.3 |
C. Barrett
|
G | 4 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 5 | 1.2 | 35.2 | 66.7 | 50.0 | 0 | 1.02 | 83.3 | 83.3 |
S. Stahl
|
F | 21 | 9.1 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 2.4 | 23 | 1.3 | 4.0 | 35.3 | 0.0 | 71.4 | 1.84 | 42.3 | 35.3 |
T. Henderson
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 98 | 4.5 | 17.1 | - | - | - | 2.21 | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG