Portland Pilots
2012 Team Stats (2 games)
58.0
PPG
75.1
Opp
-11.1
Margin
41.3%
FG%
43.8%
3P%
64.0%
FT%
31.0
RPG
10.5
APG
16.5
TO
74.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1169 (#241) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1190 (#245) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +18.2 (#261) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.093 (#111) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.024 (#233) | NetEff -33.1 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.072 (#110) | AdjNet -22.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.071 (#110) | AdjNet -22.6 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R. Nicholas
|
F | 28 | 28.5 | 11.4 | 7.9 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 16.4 | - | - | - | 48.1 | 25.0 | 64.3 | - | 175.2 | 48.7 |
K. Bailey
|
G | 28 | 21.2 | 9.5 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 9.2 | - | - | - | 44.8 | 42.1 | 85.0 | - | 174.8 | 50.7 |
N. Mitrovic
|
G | 28 | 22.5 | 8.2 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 2.7 | 8.5 | - | - | - | 34.2 | 34.1 | 90.0 | - | 143.7 | 44.1 |
T. Douglas
|
G | 28 | 23.5 | 8.2 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.1 | 8.8 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 7.7 | 82.8 | - | 158.7 | 34.2 |
T. van der Mars
|
C | 28 | 24.5 | 7.5 | 5.0 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 11.2 | - | - | - | 54.2 | 0 | 61.1 | - | 157.7 | 54.2 |
T. Riley
|
G | 25 | 16.8 | 5.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 5.8 | 12 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 100.0 | 1.03 | 228.3 | 65.0 |
D. Cason
|
C | 28 | 17.9 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 39.4 | 41.7 | 61.1 | - | 147.8 | 47.0 |
D. Rodgers
|
G | 28 | 17.6 | 3.7 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 5.4 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 54.5 | - | 201.2 | 33.3 |
D. Carr
|
G | 28 | 17.9 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 4.1 | - | - | - | 36.4 | 42.1 | 66.7 | - | 111.4 | 45.5 |
R. Barker
|
C | 7 | 15.3 | 2.0 | 3.7 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 5.3 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 119.0 | 20.0 |
E. Waterford
|
G | 12 | 7.3 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 2.8 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 83.8 | 50.0 |
J. Bailey
|
F | 22 | 5.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 2.0 | -30 | -2.7 | -4.9 | 44.4 | 0 | 33.3 | 0.22 | 107.4 | 44.4 |
T. Mossman
|
G | 1 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 26.6 | 0.0 |
K. Thieleke
|
G | 12 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 76.5 | 20.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG