Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Also known as: Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Program History
2026 Team Stats (65 games)
75.8
PPG
64.0
Opp
+9.7
Margin
45.4%
FG%
35.1%
3P%
73.9%
FT%
35.3
RPG
13.2
APG
12.4
TO
81.0
Pace
81.2
AdjO
53.7
AdjD
#20
Rank
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo | 1422 (#6) | - |
| Bradley-Terry | 1313 (#24) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency | 1163 (#16) | - |
| Margin | +28.4 (#21) | HCA +2.3 |
| Margin Recency | +41.1 (#13) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean | 0.886 (#34) | - |
| Efficiency | 0.906 (#40) | NetEff +18.7 |
| Adjusted Efficiency | 0.989 (#22) | AdjO 119.5 | AdjD 80.5 |
| Log Adjusted | 0.990 (#22) | AdjO 120.8 | AdjD 80.7 |
| Points Off/Def | 0.924 (#20) | AdjO 81.2 | AdjD 53.7 |
| Points Off/Def Recency | 0.862 (#10) | AdjO 75.0 | AdjD 54.9 |
| Core Ensemble | 0.976 (#18) | Blend of elo, bradley_terry_recency, margin_recency, pythagorean_log_adjusted, points_off_def |
| Recency Ensemble | 0.969 (#17) | Blend of elo, bradley_terry_recency, margin_recency, pythagorean_log_adjusted, points_off_def_recency |
| KenPom Kitchen Sink | 0.970 (#58) | - |
| Dynamic BT | 1321 (#18) | HCA +45.0 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-05 | vs | FDU | W | 98 - 52 |
| 2025-11-09 | vs | Chicago St. | W | 116 - 58 |
| 2025-11-12 | vs | Akron | W | 85 - 58 |
| 2025-11-15 | vs | Michigan | L | 54 - 93 |
| 2025-11-21 | vs | Southern California | W | 61 - 59 |
| 2025-11-24 | vs | Central Mich. | W | 83 - 51 |
| 2025-12-04 | @ | Ole Miss | L | 62 - 69 |
| 2025-12-07 | @ | Florida St. | W | 93 - 58 |
| 2025-12-11 | vs | Morehead St. | W | 97 - 48 |
| 2025-12-14 | @ | James Madison | W | 78 - 65 |
| 2025-12-21 | vs | Bellarmine | W | 110 - 38 |
| 2025-12-29 | vs | Pittsburgh | W | 94 - 59 |
| 2025-12-30 | @ | UMBC | L | 22 - 104 |
| 2026-01-01 | @ | Georgia Tech | L | 90 - 95 |
| 2026-01-04 | @ | Duke | L | 68 - 82 |
| 2026-01-08 | vs | Boston College | W | 94 - 60 |
| 2026-01-11 | vs | North Carolina | W | 73 - 50 |
| 2026-01-15 | vs | Louisville | L | 66 - 79 |
| 2026-01-19 | @ | UConn | L | 47 - 85 |
| 2026-01-22 | vs | Miami (FL) | W | 74 - 66 |
| 2026-01-25 | vs | Clemson | L | 58 - 65 |
| 2026-01-29 | @ | California | L | 69 - 80 |
| 2026-02-01 | @ | Stanford | W | 78 - 66 |
| 2026-02-05 | vs | Virginia Tech | W | 80 - 70 |
| 2026-02-08 | @ | Virginia | L | 0 - 0 |
| 2026-02-15 | vs | NC State | W | 79 - 67 |
| 2026-02-19 | @ | Wake Forest | W | 78 - 54 |
| 2026-02-22 | @ | SMU | W | 88 - 63 |
| 2026-02-26 | vs | Syracuse | W | 72 - 62 |
| 2026-03-01 | @ | Louisville | W | 65 - 62 |
| 2026-03-05 | vs | Miami (FL) | W | 69 - 54 |
| 2026-03-06 | @ | NC State | W | 81 - 63 |
| 2026-03-07 | @ | Duke | L | 63 - 65 |
| 2026-03-21 | vs | Fairfield | W | 79 - 60 |
| 2026-03-23 | @ | Ohio St. | W | 83 - 73 |
| 2026-03-27 | @ | Vanderbilt | W | 67 - 64 |
| 2026-03-29 | @ | UConn | L | 52 - 70 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles, with four dividers separating the position buckets.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H. Hidalgo | G | 36 | 36.3 | 25.2 | 6.9 | 5.2 | 5.6 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 19.8 | 20.2 | - | - | - | 47.5 | 25.4 | 83.3 | - | 55.6 | 50.0 |
| C. Prosper | G | 36 | 33.1 | 13.6 | 6.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 10.8 | 11.6 | - | - | - | 49.2 | 30.5 | 73.8 | - | 55.5 | 51.5 |
| I. Moore | G | 34 | 31.7 | 11.8 | 3.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 9.9 | 6.6 | - | - | - | 39.1 | 37.2 | 87.0 | - | 55.0 | 51.0 |
| V. de Jesus | G | 36 | 34.2 | 8.4 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 7.3 | 6.6 | - | - | - | 40.2 | 40.0 | 90.0 | - | 53.6 | 50.4 |
| M. Cowles | F | 33 | 27.8 | 7.9 | 5.3 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 6.9 | 8.5 | - | - | - | 52.0 | 0 | 61.0 | - | 53.3 | 52.0 |
| KK Bransford | G | 24 | 25.1 | 7.4 | 4.0 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 6.2 | 6.2 | - | - | - | 47.3 | 27.3 | 62.5 | - | 52.0 | 49.3 |
| G. Sanchez | F | 35 | 19.1 | 5.7 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 4.6 | 5.3 | - | - | - | 51.6 | 50.0 | 75.0 | - | 59.8 | 59.0 |
| K. Ratigan | G | 17 | 8.0 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 0.9 | - | - | - | 35.0 | 31.2 | 66.7 | - | 50.8 | 47.5 |
| B. Tehrani | F | 8 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 43.6 | 33.3 |
| J. Smith | G | 15 | 3.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 36.8 | 40.0 |
| L. Jensen | G | 12 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 20.0 | 0 | - | 30.0 | 30.0 |
Leah Macy
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG