Notre Dame (MD) Gators
Also known as: Notre Dame (MD)
Program History
2026 Team Stats (3 games)
62.3
PPG
103.7
Opp
-41.4
Margin
35.4%
FG%
26.2%
3P%
75.9%
FT%
30.3
RPG
7.3
APG
13.0
TO
86.9
Pace
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 991 (#490) | HCA +109 elo |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -19.8 (#602) | HCA +2.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.388 (#635) | AdjO 72.1 | AdjD 77.1 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.173 (#601) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.213 (#606) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 841 (#628) | RD 350 | GP 3 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-24 | @ | UMBC Retrievers | L | 52 - 102 |
| 2025-11-29 | @ | Radford Highlanders | L | 75 - 102 |
| 2025-12-19 | @ | Towson Tigers | L | 60 - 107 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R. Ross
|
- | 3 | 21.3 | 14.7 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 10.3 | 5.7 | - | - | - | 54.8 | 43.8 | 100.0 | - | 68.1 | 66.1 |
M. Lewis
|
- | 3 | 19.0 | 9.7 | 5.0 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 11.3 | 5.7 | 59 | 4.9 | 25.5 | 41.2 | 16.7 | 0 | 0.27 | 42.6 | 42.6 |
A. Wright
|
- | 3 | 24.0 | 6.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 10.0 | -1.3 | 36 | 1.6 | 5.0 | 26.7 | 25.0 | 75.0 | 0.32 | 31.5 | 28.3 |
J. Dacosta
|
- | 3 | 20.0 | 6.3 | 5.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 6.3 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 47.4 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 47.8 | 47.4 |
C. Green
|
- | 3 | 20.7 | 4.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 4.7 | -0.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 35.7 | 50.0 | 0.0 | -0.37 | 48.5 | 50.0 |
A. Degirmenci
|
- | 3 | 10.3 | 4.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 4.0 | 1.7 | - | - | - | 41.7 | 37.5 | 50.0 | - | 54.3 | 54.2 |
J. Pugh
|
- | 3 | 23.0 | 4.0 | 3.7 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 6.0 | 2.7 | - | - | - | 27.8 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 31.8 | 27.8 |
D. Long
|
- | 3 | 22.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 6.7 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 30.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 30.0 | 30.0 |
A. Sheikh
|
- | 3 | 11.7 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 20.0 | 100.0 | - | 54.3 | 35.7 |
J. Foster
|
- | 3 | 12.7 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 5.3 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 75.0 | - | 37.0 | 20.0 |
C. Johnson
|
- | 2 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 5.5 | -5.5 | 31 | 2.8 | 35.0 | 9.1 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.28 | 9.1 | 9.1 |
J. Gibson
|
- | 3 | 9.3 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 12.9 | 0.0 |
A. Bell
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG