🐻⬇️🏀

Nebraska

Also known as: Nebraska Cornhuskers, Nebraska
Program History

2026 Team Stats (34 games)

77.1
PPG
66.6
Opp
+10.5
Margin
46.6%
FG%
35.4%
3P%
75.9%
FT%
34.7
RPG
18.2
APG
9.8
TO
75.4
Pace
82.0
AdjO
61.6
AdjD
#18
Rank

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1153 (#66) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1350 (#9) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +109 elo More → 1086 (#61) HCA +109 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.2 More → +20.2 (#18) HCA +2.2
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.5 More → +31.0 (#17) HCA +2.5
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.851 (#14) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +15.6 More → 0.835 (#67) NetEff +15.6
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +27.9 More → 0.962 (#13) AdjNet +27.9
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +28.1 More → 0.963 (#15) AdjNet +28.1
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 82.0 | AdjD 61.6 More → 0.865 (#18) AdjO 82.0 | AdjD 61.6
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 75.3 | AdjD 63.9 More → 0.737 (#25) AdjO 75.3 | AdjD 63.9
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.943 (#19) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.922 (#20) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 100 | GP 34 More → 1307 (#29) RD 100 | GP 34

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-03 vs West Georgia Wolves W 86 - 53
2025-11-08 vs Florida International Panthers W 96 - 66
2025-11-11 vs Maryland Eastern Shore Hawks W 69 - 50
2025-11-15 vs Oklahoma Sooners W 105 - 99
2025-11-20 @ New Mexico Lobos W 84 - 72
2025-11-21 vs Kansas State Wildcats W 86 - 85
2025-11-25 vs Winthrop Eagles W 80 - 73
2025-11-29 vs South Carolina Upstate Spartans W 72 - 63
2025-12-10 vs Wisconsin Badgers W 90 - 60
2025-12-13 @ Illinois Fighting Illini W 83 - 80
2025-12-21 vs North Dakota Fighting Hawks W 78 - 55
2025-12-30 vs New Hampshire Wildcats W 86 - 55
2026-01-02 vs Michigan State Spartans W 58 - 56
2026-01-05 @ Ohio State Buckeyes W 72 - 69
2026-01-10 @ Indiana Hoosiers W 83 - 77
2026-01-13 vs Oregon Ducks W 90 - 55
2026-01-17 @ Northwestern Wildcats W 77 - 58
2026-01-21 vs Washington Huskies W 76 - 66
2026-01-24 @ Minnesota Golden Gophers W 76 - 57
2026-01-27 @ Michigan Wolverines L 72 - 75
2026-02-01 vs Illinois Fighting Illini L 69 - 78
2026-02-07 @ Rutgers Scarlet Knights W 80 - 68
2026-02-10 vs Purdue Boilermakers L 77 - 80
2026-02-14 vs Northwestern Wildcats W 68 - 49
2026-02-17 @ Iowa Hawkeyes L 52 - 57
2026-02-21 vs Penn State Nittany Lions W 87 - 64
2026-02-25 vs Maryland Terrapins W 74 - 61
2026-02-28 @ USC Trojans W 82 - 67
2026-03-03 @ UCLA Bruins L 52 - 72
2026-03-08 vs Iowa Hawkeyes W 84 - 75
2026-03-13 vs Purdue Boilermakers L 58 - 74
2026-03-19 vs Troy Trojans W 76 - 47
2026-03-21 vs Vanderbilt Commodores W 74 - 72
2026-03-26 vs Iowa Hawkeyes L 71 - 77

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Pr. Sandfort Pr. Sandfort - 34 33.6 18.3 4.8 2.1 1.0 0.3 0.7 13.1 12.6 -8 -8.0 -19.1 47.5 41.5 85.4 -0.08 64.4 61.8
R. Mast R. Mast - 33 29.2 13.1 5.8 3.1 0.4 0.3 1.7 11.2 9.8 208 9.9 19.9 44.1 30.1 81.1 1.09 53.8 50.4
B. Frager B. Frager - 32 23.8 12.0 3.8 1.1 0.8 0.1 1.0 8.4 8.3 160 8.0 15.1 49.1 35.0 81.0 1.44 63.2 59.5
J. Lawrence J. Lawrence G 34 28.0 9.8 2.4 3.8 0.9 0.0 2.0 7.7 7.2 151 6.6 13.3 42.2 35.6 75.6 1.6 56.2 52.3
S. Hoiberg S. Hoiberg G 34 32.4 9.1 5.3 4.4 2.0 0.1 1.2 6.4 13.3 269 12.2 20.3 53.9 37.5 77.2 1.39 63.5 60.7
U. Jarusevicius U. Jarusevicius - 1 11.0 7.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 6.0 1 1.0 3.8 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.02 101.7 116.7
B. Buyuktuncel B. Buyuktuncel F 32 24.2 6.6 5.3 1.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 5.2 9.3 190 9.0 15.7 47.9 25.0 62.7 1.36 54.4 51.8
C. Essegian C. Essegian G 7 13.9 5.4 1.3 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.7 6.3 0.9 58 8.3 26.5 31.8 25.8 50.0 0.63 41.5 40.9
C. Jacobsen C. Jacobsen - 34 19.7 4.7 2.9 1.4 1.0 0.3 0.6 3.4 6.3 90 4.1 10.6 52.6 37.5 59.5 0.34 60.4 59.2
J. Garcia J. Garcia - 27 8.4 3.1 2.2 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.7 2.9 2.7 12 0.9 6.6 33.8 25.6 77.8 0.72 46.7 40.3
Leo Curtis Leo Curtis - 16 3.9 1.7 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 1.1 1.4 -23 -1.9 -17.8 58.8 0.0 87.5 -0.32 65.8 58.8
K. Blue K. Blue - 18 3.6 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.3 -41 -3.2 -29.8 33.3 42.9 100.0 -0.76 50.5 45.8
J. Bolis J. Bolis - 16 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 -8 -0.7 -17.4 0.0 0.0 50.0 -0.12 26.6 0.0
H. Burt H. Burt F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W. Cooper W. Cooper F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Quentin Rhymes Quentin Rhymes G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG