Duke Blue Devils
2012 Team Stats (29 games)
75.0
PPG
56.8
Opp
+18.2
Margin
47.7%
FG%
36.2%
3P%
70.9%
FT%
36.0
RPG
16.6
APG
0.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
77.9
Adj PPG
48.8
Adj Opp PPG
#5
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1518 (#6) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1415 (#7) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1178 (#11) | HCA +78 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +30.9 (#5) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +29.0 (#5) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.962 (#10) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.996 (#6) | AdjNet +47.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.996 (#5) | AdjNet +48.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.934 (#5) | AdjO 77.9 | AdjD 48.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.871 (#5) | AdjO 75.2 | AdjD 54.1 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.957 (#6) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.951 (#6) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1404 (#7) | RD 107 | GP 31 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
Not enough player minute data to plot.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E. Williams
|
C | 29 | 0.0 | 14.1 | 7.9 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 11.9 | 13.5 | 248 | 19 | 13.1 | 18.2 | 47.7 | 50.0 | 64.2 | 3.76 | 51.2 | 47.8 |
T. Liston
|
G | 16 | 0.0 | 12.6 | 4.8 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 8.2 | 10.1 | 242 | 19 | 12.7 | 19.8 | 52.3 | 49.1 | 86.0 | 4.32 | 66.9 | 62.5 |
C. Gray
|
G | 29 | 0.0 | 12.4 | 4.9 | 6.3 | 2.9 | 0.4 | 3.5 | 10.0 | 13.4 | 254 | 19 | 13.4 | 17.7 | 45.5 | 38.5 | 85.7 | 2.65 | 55.2 | 49.8 |
C. Wells
|
G | 8 | 0.0 | 11.2 | 2.4 | 4.6 | 4.0 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 9.6 | 11.4 | 137 | 6 | 22.8 | 34.0 | 45.5 | 31.6 | 87.5 | 5.25 | 53.5 | 49.4 |
Haley Peters
|
F | 29 | 0.0 | 11.2 | 5.9 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 9.2 | 8.3 | 274 | 19 | 14.4 | 21.5 | 52.8 | 48.6 | 73.0 | 6.93 | 57.5 | 56.0 |
R. Jackson
|
F | 16 | 0.0 | 10.2 | 4.8 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 7.5 | 8.4 | 155 | 15 | 10.3 | 16.6 | 53.3 | 42.9 | 70.7 | 0.22 | 59.0 | 55.8 |
S. Selby
|
NA | 15 | 0.0 | 8.2 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 7.2 | 7.5 | 163 | 15 | 10.9 | 18.9 | 43.5 | 25.6 | 72.0 | 1.66 | 51.7 | 48.6 |
A. Vernerey
|
NA | 1 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 141 | 19 | 7.4 | 21.5 | 33.3 | 0 | 66.7 | 4.76 | 41.0 | 33.3 |
K. Scheer
|
NA | 2 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 100 | 19 | 5.3 | 18.0 | 60.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.34 | 51.0 | 60.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG