Cal Poly
2013 Team Stats (3 games)
61.0
PPG
63.1
Opp
+1.7
Margin
41.6%
FG%
31.3%
3P%
67.4%
FT%
35.0
RPG
11.7
APG
9.3
TO
69.3
Pace
Model Outputs
2012-2013
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1124 (#260) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1116 (#298) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1027 (#132) | HCA +147 elo |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 896 (#556) | HCA +147 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +17.2 (#291) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +5.8 (#215) | HCA +3.3 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -0.1 (#311) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.634 (#38) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.571 (#81) | NetEff +2.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.277 (#85) | AdjNet -8.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.256 (#88) | AdjNet -9.4 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.503 (#215) | AdjO 60.2 | AdjD 60.1 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.381 (#538) | AdjO 63.5 | AdjD 68.8 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.698 (#155) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.401 (#358) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.665 (#163) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.382 (#378) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1063 (#163) | RD 114 | GP 32 |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 822 (#533) | RD 169 | GP 30 |
2013 Schedule & Results
2013 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. Eversley
|
F | 30 | 32.9 | 15.4 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 4.1 | 19.3 | 50 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 46.8 | 41.2 | 70.4 | 0.4 | 156.7 | 49.6 |
D. Royer
|
G | 32 | 28.1 | 10.1 | 2.4 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 10.9 | 26 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 45.1 | 51.6 | 90.0 | 0.17 | 186.3 | 65.2 |
B. Bennett
|
F | 32 | 23.9 | 9.3 | 4.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 2.4 | 12.2 | 23 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 54.5 | 0.0 | 72.7 | 0.26 | 182.7 | 54.5 |
K. Odister
|
G | 30 | 17.9 | 6.5 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 6.5 | 24 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 36.7 | 30.6 | 62.5 | -0.08 | 185.6 | 48.0 |
R. Morgan
|
G | 32 | 19.1 | 5.9 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 8.4 | 56 | 1.8 | 3.2 | 22.7 | 26.7 | 93.3 | 0.64 | 185.8 | 31.8 |
D. U'u
|
G | 32 | 21.8 | 5.3 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 9.3 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 30.0 | 55.2 | - | 178.0 | 44.3 |
C. O'Brien
|
G | 31 | 20.7 | 5.1 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 8.3 | 85 | 2.7 | 4.4 | 58.6 | 80.0 | 82.6 | 0.79 | 200.7 | 72.4 |
J. Johnson
|
G | 32 | 23.5 | 4.4 | 2.2 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 8.5 | 213 | 6.9 | 10.8 | 30.6 | 25.0 | 68.4 | 0.71 | 122.9 | 33.7 |
J. Awich
|
F | 24 | 10.7 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 4.2 | 36 | 1.5 | 4.2 | 54.5 | 20.0 | 100.0 | 0.1 | 271.0 | 59.1 |
Z. Gordon
|
F | 31 | 8.7 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 4.4 | -13 | -0.4 | -1.3 | 58.3 | 0 | 66.7 | -0.13 | 216.2 | 58.3 |
A. Silvestri
|
F | 11 | 2.9 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.9 | -21 | -2.1 | -16.4 | 66.7 | 50.0 | 0 | -0.32 | 133.3 | 83.3 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG