🐻⬇️🏀

UTSA Roadrunners

Season: 2026 2025 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Also known as: UTSA Roadrunners
Program History

2026 Team Stats (32 games)

59.1
PPG
59.0
Opp
+0.1
Margin
39.4%
FG%
29.2%
3P%
69.7%
FT%
39.6
RPG
13.0
APG
18.6
TO
81.2
Pace
60.8
AdjO
56.0
AdjD
#113
Rank

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1217 (#53) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1052 (#143) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +113 elo More → 1104 (#61) HCA +113 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.3 More → +4.9 (#112) HCA +2.3
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.8 More → +20.3 (#89) HCA +2.8
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.488 (#173) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +0.0 More → 0.500 (#174) NetEff +0.0
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +8.2 More → 0.720 (#111) AdjNet +8.2
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +8.4 More → 0.728 (#112) AdjNet +8.4
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 60.8 | AdjD 56.0 More → 0.607 (#113) AdjO 60.8 | AdjD 56.0
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 59.7 | AdjD 53.6 More → 0.635 (#108) AdjO 59.7 | AdjD 53.6
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.858 (#103) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.836 (#99) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 106 | GP 32 More → 1141 (#106) RD 106 | GP 32

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-06 @ Texas Tech Lady Raiders L 52 - 79
2025-11-08 @ Houston Cougars L 48 - 52
2025-11-13 vs Texas State Bobcats W 64 - 41
2025-11-19 @ Incarnate Word Cardinals W 74 - 57
2025-11-24 vs Auburn Tigers L 42 - 59
2025-11-26 @ Grand Canyon Lopes W 65 - 64
2025-12-03 vs UNLV Lady Rebels L 39 - 66
2025-12-07 @ Baylor Bears L 55 - 73
2025-12-15 vs Texas A&M-Kingsville Javelinas W 82 - 40
2025-12-20 @ Columbia Lions L 65 - 70
2025-12-30 vs Tulane Green Wave W 65 - 63
2026-01-03 @ Temple Owls W 50 - 47
2026-01-10 vs Charlotte 49ers W 69 - 63
2026-01-16 @ Florida Atlantic Owls W 79 - 42
2026-01-20 vs East Carolina Pirates L 58 - 65
2026-01-24 @ Memphis Tigers L 40 - 52
2026-01-27 vs North Texas Mean Green W 66 - 64
2026-01-31 vs Rice Owls L 55 - 65
2026-02-03 @ UAB Blazers L 69 - 81
2026-02-07 @ Tulsa Golden Hurricane W 66 - 47
2026-02-10 vs Temple Owls W 52 - 43
2026-02-14 vs South Florida Bulls L 63 - 69
2026-02-21 @ Wichita State Shockers L 61 - 62
2026-02-24 @ North Texas Mean Green L 63 - 87
2026-03-01 vs Memphis Tigers W 67 - 55
2026-03-04 vs Tulsa Golden Hurricane L 41 - 53
2026-03-07 @ Rice Owls W 61 - 52
2026-03-11 vs Temple Owls W 59 - 51
2026-03-12 @ South Florida Bulls W 62 - 51
2026-03-13 @ East Carolina Pirates W 54 - 44
2026-03-14 @ Rice Owls W 54 - 40
2026-03-21 @ UConn Huskies L 52 - 90

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
C. Rowe C. Rowe F 31 33.1 14.3 8.5 1.0 0.6 0.9 2.0 12.9 10.4 33 1.5 1.8 45.1 27.3 74.2 -0.28 50.1 46.6
E. Hardaway E. Hardaway PG 31 31.9 11.6 3.9 4.5 1.6 0.0 3.1 9.2 9.3 31 1.6 1.7 42.3 42.9 72.9 1.63 53.9 49.1
I. Udo I. Udo F 25 24.8 9.2 7.3 1.0 0.8 0.8 2.6 8.2 8.2 31 2.2 4.1 42.7 16.7 67.1 -0.09 47.8 43.0
D. Allen D. Allen G 32 27.8 7.9 4.5 1.8 0.8 0.1 2.6 8.0 4.5 74 3.1 8.3 35.2 30.2 73.6 2.64 45.5 42.0
M. Hammonds M. Hammonds G 32 26.5 6.6 4.9 1.3 1.2 0.8 2.6 6.1 6.2 43 2.0 3.1 41.2 17.6 63.9 -0.08 47.0 42.8
A. Robles A. Robles PG 32 21.7 4.8 2.5 2.0 1.0 0.0 2.1 4.8 3.4 244 10.2 13.8 34.8 24.6 59.6 2.56 43.0 39.4
J. Holiman J. Holiman PG 32 17.2 3.8 2.1 0.8 0.6 0.2 1.1 4.5 1.9 44 2.0 4.0 29.9 27.7 66.7 0.92 40.5 38.9
E. Dannebauer E. Dannebauer F 31 12.4 2.1 1.9 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.8 2.3 2.1 34 1.6 3.2 31.0 0.0 75.0 2.76 39.0 31.0
S. Bean S. Bean F 32 9.0 1.3 1.4 0.3 0.2 0.5 1.0 1.2 1.6 -1 -0.0 -0.2 44.7 0 80.0 -0.65 49.5 44.7
S. Guttadauro S. Guttadauro G 13 7.8 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.5 1.9 0.0 -42 -4.7 -14.2 16.0 15.0 50.0 -3.51 23.2 22.0
N. Gony N. Gony F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
M. Linton M. Linton G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
T. Ross T. Ross F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - -23 -1.6 -4.7 - - - -3.29 - -
Sema Udo Sema Udo F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Saher Alizada Saher Alizada PG 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
M. Han M. Han G 2 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 -1.0 - - - 0.0 0.0 0 0.33 0.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG