UMass
2012 Team Stats (1 games)
88.0
PPG
90.0
Opp
-2.0
Margin
44.9%
FG%
50.0%
3P%
60.0%
FT%
45.0
RPG
16.0
APG
17.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
76.7
Adj PPG
69.3
Adj Opp PPG
#70
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1216 (#62) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1197 (#54) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1118 (#38) | HCA +101 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +7.8 (#71) | HCA +3.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +9.4 (#52) | HCA +3.2 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.675 (#89) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.770 (#86) | AdjNet +10.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.772 (#88) | AdjNet +10.5 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.661 (#70) | AdjO 76.7 | AdjD 69.3 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.635 (#59) | AdjO 76.3 | AdjD 70.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.726 (#61) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.721 (#58) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1195 (#52) | RD 89 | GP 35 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. Williams
|
G | 35 | 34.9 | 17.1 | 4.3 | 6.1 | 2.3 | 0.2 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 22.4 | 63 | 30 | 2.1 | 3.3 | 41.7 | 40.5 | 80.2 | 3.46 | 171.5 | 47.8 |
R. Putney
|
F | 34 | 24.6 | 10.5 | 5.9 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 2.6 | 15.9 | 91 | 29 | 3.1 | 7.0 | 48.9 | 45.2 | 60.0 | 2.71 | 184.4 | 59.7 |
T. Vinson
|
F | 35 | 26.1 | 10.1 | 5.0 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 13.7 | 33 | 29 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 46.9 | 42.9 | 69.2 | -0.41 | 192.0 | 54.3 |
J. Morgan
|
G | 35 | 26.5 | 9.4 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 11.3 | 21 | 30 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 40.4 | 34.9 | 67.6 | -0.81 | 138.3 | 47.6 |
S. Carter
|
F | 7 | 19.1 | 8.6 | 3.9 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 14.1 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
S. Carter
|
F-C | 35 | 28.2 | 8.0 | 6.5 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 13.7 | 68 | 30 | 2.3 | 4.4 | 62.3 | 0 | 60.5 | 2.83 | 163.3 | 62.3 |
C. Lalanne
|
C | 14 | 14.9 | 6.7 | 5.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 12.5 | 18 | 11 | 1.6 | 6.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.38 | 0 | 0 |
F. Riley
|
G | 35 | 17.3 | 6.5 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 6.7 | -34 | 29 | -1.2 | -3.5 | 27.9 | 25.0 | 62.5 | -1.98 | 176.7 | 36.9 |
J. Farrell
|
G | 34 | 21.4 | 6.3 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 9.3 | -41 | 29 | -1.4 | -3.6 | 33.3 | 37.5 | 66.7 | -2.97 | 172.8 | 38.9 |
M. Esho
|
F | 35 | 13.7 | 5.0 | 3.4 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 8.3 | -45 | 29 | -1.6 | -5.3 | 43.3 | 0.0 | 66.7 | -2.61 | 249.4 | 43.3 |
A. McCarthy
|
- | 8 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.1 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
M. Hill
|
F | 7 | 5.4 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.3 | -7 | 5 | -1.4 | -10.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -2.59 | 150.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG