UC Davis
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1339 (#143) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1275 (#162) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +18.5 (#255) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.064 (#113) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.018 (#118) | AdjNet -34.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.017 (#118) | AdjNet -34.9 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R. Sypkens
|
G | 4 | 33.0 | 14.5 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 17.0 | - | - | - | 46.7 | 36.4 | 50.0 | - | 182.6 | 60.0 |
J. Ritchart
|
G | 26 | 27.3 | 11.1 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 15.8 | - | - | - | 48.5 | 35.3 | 100.0 | - | 394.3 | 57.6 |
T. Les
|
G | 27 | 27.8 | 10.5 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 11.6 | - | - | - | 52.2 | 55.6 | 100.0 | - | 592.5 | 73.9 |
E. Miller
|
G | 21 | 26.4 | 10.2 | 4.9 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 14.4 | - | - | - | 27.3 | 0.0 | 75.0 | - | 421.2 | 27.3 |
H. DuPont
|
G | 21 | 25.6 | 9.0 | 4.1 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 12.1 | - | - | - | 35.7 | 0 | 60.0 | - | 414.5 | 35.7 |
R. Howley
|
G | 16 | 28.7 | 6.9 | 5.8 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 12.2 | - | - | - | 57.7 | 57.1 | 50.0 | - | 199.9 | 73.1 |
T. Corbin
|
G | 26 | 22.7 | 6.2 | 1.8 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 7.7 | - | - | - | 42.4 | 36.4 | 72.7 | - | 211.4 | 48.5 |
J.T. Adenrele
|
F | 26 | 16.7 | 5.6 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 8.3 | - | - | - | 44.4 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 583.1 | 44.4 |
A. Tiffin
|
F | 27 | 16.3 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 4.7 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 0 | 71.4 | - | 316.1 | 45.5 |
P. Mancasola
|
- | 26 | 20.4 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 100.0 | 75.0 | - | 468.0 | 57.1 |
A. Malik
|
G | 23 | 9.7 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 3.9 | - | - | - | 30.0 | 16.7 | 0 | - | 305.0 | 35.0 |
D. Lippi
|
- | 3 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
R. Silva
|
G | 4 | 8.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
M. Kurtz
|
F | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG