Michigan
2013 Team Stats (31 games)
75.3
PPG
63.3
Opp
+11.9
Margin
48.3%
FG%
38.4%
3P%
70.0%
FT%
34.6
RPG
14.6
APG
9.5
TO
75.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2012-2013
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1768 (#17) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1584 (#20) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1160 (#16) | HCA +147 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +39.0 (#14) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +28.3 (#2) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.754 (#15) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.864 (#20) | NetEff +16.7 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.907 (#7) | AdjNet +19.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.909 (#7) | AdjNet +20.0 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.798 (#3) | AdjO 76.3 | AdjD 61.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.948 (#5) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.938 (#3) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1387 (#4) | RD 85 | GP 39 |
2013 Schedule & Results
2013 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T. Burke
|
G | 39 | 35.3 | 18.6 | 3.2 | 6.7 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 12.6 | 15.8 | -27 | -5.4 | -22.9 | 46.9 | 37.9 | 79.6 | 2.18 | 65.3 | 53.8 |
T. Hardaway Jr.
|
G | 38 | 34.8 | 14.5 | 4.7 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 10.6 | 10.3 | - | - | - | 43.4 | 38.6 | 68.5 | 1.37 | 62.5 | 51.6 |
G. Robinson III
|
F | 39 | 33.6 | 11.0 | 5.4 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 6.4 | 11.5 | - | - | - | 57.8 | 32.8 | 71.4 | 2.5 | 73.5 | 61.8 |
N. Stauskas
|
G | 39 | 30.5 | 11.0 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 6.8 | 8.2 | - | - | - | 47.6 | 44.8 | 82.9 | 2.32 | 71.6 | 61.2 |
M. McGary
|
F | 39 | 19.7 | 7.5 | 6.3 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 5.0 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 60.7 | 0 | 41.0 | 2.17 | 68.3 | 60.7 |
J. Morgan
|
F | 36 | 15.9 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 3.1 | 5.8 | 116 | 3.3 | 9.6 | 57.3 | 0 | 57.5 | 0.52 | 65.0 | 57.3 |
J. Horford
|
C | 32 | 8.8 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 4.2 | 56 | 1.8 | 6.3 | 53.5 | 0 | 66.7 | 0.13 | 85.4 | 53.5 |
C. LeVert
|
C | 33 | 10.8 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 1.6 | - | - | - | 30.1 | 27.5 | 58.3 | 0.64 | 43.0 | 36.7 |
S. Albrecht
|
G | 39 | 8.1 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 122 | 3.3 | 12.2 | 43.4 | 48.3 | 87.5 | 0.91 | 74.3 | 56.6 |
E. Akunne
|
G | 18 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 14 | 0.8 | 8.9 | 27.3 | 27.3 | 50.0 | 0.18 | 45.9 | 34.1 |
M. Bielfeldt
|
F | 19 | 5.6 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 30 | 1.5 | 9.6 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 41.7 | 0.29 | 49.4 | 50.0 |
M. Vogrich
|
G | 26 | 5.6 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 38 | 1.5 | 7.8 | 38.1 | 31.2 | 75.0 | -0.08 | 57.1 | 50.0 |
C. Person
|
G | 13 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 50.0 | 66.7 | - | 68.3 | 41.7 |
B. McLimans
|
C | 17 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 4 | 0.2 | 3.6 | 28.6 | 20.0 | 50.0 | -0.03 | 37.0 | 35.7 |
J. Bartelstein
|
G | 6 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG