Cal Poly
2011 Team Stats (2 games)
60.5
PPG
55.5
Opp
+5.0
Margin
37.1%
FG%
38.2%
3P%
69.8%
FT%
34.5
RPG
10.5
APG
19.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
56.9
Adj PPG
58.3
Adj Opp PPG
#186
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 847 (#251) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 934 (#218) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 959 (#236) | HCA +91 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | -1.4 (#183) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | -2.1 (#203) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.439 (#195) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.390 (#202) | AdjNet -3.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.390 (#201) | AdjNet -3.9 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.468 (#186) | AdjO 56.9 | AdjD 58.3 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.474 (#193) | AdjO 58.9 | AdjD 60.1 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.405 (#218) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.406 (#223) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 874 (#261) | RD 140 | GP 25 |
2011 Schedule & Results
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shawn Lewis
|
G | 14 | 32.2 | 17.1 | 5.6 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 6.1 | 17.6 | 43 | 28 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 44.2 | 34.2 | 72.7 | 1.22 | 119.4 | 51.7 |
David Hanson
|
F | 14 | 34.6 | 14.9 | 6.6 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 5.6 | 18.0 | 38 | 28 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 41.0 | 37.5 | 71.4 | 1.91 | 124.2 | 50.6 |
Will Donahue
|
C | 14 | 30.1 | 8.7 | 8.8 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 14.6 | 24 | 28 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 52.9 | 0 | 47.4 | -1.13 | 144.0 | 52.9 |
Chris O'Brien
|
G | 14 | 27.0 | 6.0 | 3.6 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 8.6 | 32 | 25 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 24.3 | 11.8 | 100.0 | 0.36 | 102.5 | 27.0 |
Maliik Love
|
G | 14 | 26.1 | 5.6 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 7.5 | 28 | 28 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 27.3 | 0.0 | 72.7 | -0.7 | 145.3 | 27.3 |
Dylan Royer
|
G | 8 | 6.2 | 3.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 3.2 | 10 | 11 | 0.9 | 8.3 | 83.3 | 80.0 | 0.0 | -0.14 | 225.2 | 116.7 |
Jamal Johnson
|
G | 14 | 16.2 | 3.3 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 3.4 | -27 | 28 | -1.0 | -3.6 | 42.9 | 40.0 | 57.1 | -3.55 | 95.5 | 57.1 |
Drake U'u
|
G | 8 | 10.4 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 4.8 | 9 | 17 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 100.0 | -0.08 | 167.2 | 16.7 |
Matt Titchenal
|
G | 7 | 7.6 | 2.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 1.0 | -27 | 12 | -2.2 | -11.1 | 33.3 | 41.7 | 25.0 | -2.99 | 50.7 | 50.0 |
Jordan Lewis
|
F | 14 | 18.2 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 4.0 | -23 | 28 | -0.8 | -2.0 | 41.7 | 60.0 | 50.0 | -2.48 | 109.0 | 54.2 |
Ben Eisenhardt
|
F | 11 | 3.9 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 3 | 17 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.52 | 100.0 | 0.0 |
Ryan Pembleton
|
C | 4 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 | -23 | 13 | -1.8 | -16.8 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -2.91 | 50.0 | 0.0 |
Ben Kelly
|
G-F | 2 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | -1.0 | -17 | 6 | -2.8 | -28.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -2.54 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG