Wisconsin
2012 Team Stats (26 games)
62.1
PPG
54.1
Opp
+8.0
Margin
41.2%
FG%
34.7%
3P%
73.5%
FT%
32.5
RPG
11.0
APG
8.3
TO
-
Est. poss./game
65.2
Adj PPG
48.5
Adj Opp PPG
#8
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1433 (#9) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1287 (#16) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1138 (#24) | HCA +101 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +17.7 (#8) | HCA +3.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +15.9 (#11) | HCA +3.2 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.897 (#7) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.972 (#5) | AdjNet +30.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.974 (#5) | AdjNet +31.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.820 (#8) | AdjO 65.2 | AdjD 48.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.730 (#14) | AdjO 64.7 | AdjD 53.7 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.887 (#7) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.876 (#7) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1320 (#12) | RD 95 | GP 35 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jordan Taylor
|
G | 35 | 36.1 | 14.9 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 9.4 | 12.8 | 218 | 30 | 7.3 | 9.0 | 40.6 | 38.1 | 78.1 | 1.57 | 67.3 | 49.1 |
Ryan Evans
|
F | 35 | 30.3 | 11.1 | 6.8 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 7.7 | 11.8 | 220 | 30 | 7.3 | 10.6 | 44.2 | 26.1 | 74.0 | 5.55 | 61.8 | 45.4 |
Jared Berggren
|
F-C | 35 | 27.8 | 10.7 | 4.9 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 7.0 | 10.6 | 166 | 30 | 5.5 | 8.9 | 43.9 | 36.5 | 70.2 | -0.75 | 69.5 | 51.0 |
Josh Gasser
|
G | 35 | 34.1 | 7.6 | 4.2 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 3.8 | 9.5 | 210 | 30 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 44.4 | 40.3 | 77.0 | 0.68 | 80.0 | 54.5 |
Ben Brust
|
G | 35 | 21.3 | 7.1 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 5.3 | 4.7 | 160 | 30 | 5.3 | 11.2 | 38.0 | 37.0 | 85.0 | 0.94 | 64.6 | 50.0 |
Mike Bruesewitz
|
F | 35 | 25.6 | 5.5 | 5.1 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 4.1 | 8.2 | 253 | 30 | 8.4 | 14.7 | 39.2 | 25.0 | 71.8 | 4.8 | 59.6 | 44.8 |
Robert Wilson
|
G-F | 34 | 13.4 | 4.2 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 3.8 | 91 | 30 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 37.8 | 34.9 | 70.4 | 1.07 | 75.6 | 47.0 |
Frank Kaminsky
|
F | 34 | 7.7 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 51 | 28 | 1.8 | 10.0 | 39.0 | 26.9 | 40.0 | 0.54 | 67.2 | 47.6 |
J.D. Wise
|
G | 6 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 8 | 5 | 1.6 | 46.4 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.62 | 175.0 | 125.0 |
Traevon Jackson
|
G | 17 | 5.4 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 25 | 13 | 1.9 | 15.9 | 50.0 | 50.0 | 66.7 | -1.15 | 62.0 | 60.7 |
Duje Dukan
|
F | 13 | 3.2 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 4 | 9 | 0.4 | 5.9 | 75.0 | 0.0 | 25.0 | -1.11 | 78.1 | 75.0 |
Jordan Smith
|
G | 7 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.6 | - | - | - | - | 66.7 | 100.0 | 0 | -0.53 | 83.3 | 83.3 |
Evan Anderson
|
C | 14 | 2.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 5 | 9 | 0.6 | 10.5 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -1.1 | 38.7 | 50.0 |
Dan Fahey
|
G | 9 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 4 | 8 | 0.5 | 14.1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -0.22 | 100.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG