Illinois State
2022 Team Stats (3 games)
75.3
PPG
73.8
Opp
-0.1
Margin
45.9%
FG%
36.8%
3P%
76.4%
FT%
32.3
RPG
12.0
APG
13.3
TO
78.1
Pace
Model Outputs
2021-2022
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1177 (#147) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1157 (#193) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 928 (#578) | HCA +115 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +24.2 (#155) | HCA +2.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +10.4 (#196) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.526 (#54) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.247 (#199) | NetEff -10.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.187 (#98) | AdjNet -12.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.188 (#98) | AdjNet -12.7 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.496 (#247) | AdjO 69.7 | AdjD 69.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.660 (#222) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.617 (#226) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 946 (#286) | RD 148 | GP 32 |
2022 Schedule & Results
2022 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Antonio Reeves
|
- | 21 | 35.3 | 20.0 | 3.9 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 5.8 | 19.8 | - | - | - | 49.6 | 41.2 | 86.7 | 0.67 | 148.8 | 58.3 |
Chatman, Sy
|
- | 12 | 26.7 | 15.0 | 6.8 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 3.7 | 19.2 | - | - | - | 63.6 | 0.0 | 57.7 | - | 162.3 | 63.6 |
S. Hemphill
|
F | 1 | 21.0 | 15.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 12.0 | 11.0 | 93 | 2.9 | 4.5 | 58.3 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.44 | 60.3 | 58.3 |
D. Deing
|
G | 1 | 34.0 | 14.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 16.0 | 4.0 | -53 | -2.1 | -3.2 | 31.2 | 25.0 | 100.0 | 0.09 | 41.5 | 37.5 |
J. Strong
|
- | 21 | 32.6 | 11.3 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 3.5 | 13.0 | -127 | -4.1 | -9.0 | 40.5 | 47.3 | 40.0 | 0.19 | 156.2 | 58.1 |
J. Baker
|
G | 1 | 17.0 | 10.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 122 | 3.6 | 11.6 | 42.9 | 50.0 | 75.0 | 0.79 | 57.1 | 50.0 |
T. Murphy
|
F | 2 | 28.0 | 10.0 | 6.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 14.5 | 214 | 5.9 | 8.4 | 28.6 | 0.0 | 75.0 | 1.42 | 95.1 | 28.6 |
M. Freeman
|
G | 13 | 23.5 | 9.3 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.8 | 4.2 | 9.5 | -53 | -1.7 | -2.8 | 34.5 | 26.7 | 85.7 | -0.71 | 94.2 | 38.2 |
K. Lewis
|
- | 32 | 27.6 | 8.9 | 5.8 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 14.0 | - | - | - | 49.1 | 33.3 | 71.4 | 0.35 | 210.9 | 52.7 |
L. McChesney
|
- | 14 | 19.2 | 5.9 | 3.4 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 8.5 | -13 | -0.4 | -0.9 | 41.4 | 27.8 | 66.7 | 0.39 | 125.9 | 50.0 |
H. Fleming Jr.
|
G | 13 | 21.5 | 5.4 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 9.5 | 33 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 38.5 | 31.2 | 87.5 | 0.61 | 118.6 | 48.1 |
M. Howell
|
G | 2 | 20.0 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 7.5 | -56 | -1.8 | -3.5 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.3 | 175.0 | 50.0 |
R. Schmitt
|
- | 31 | 11.1 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 5.5 | 19 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 60.0 | 0 | 35.7 | 0.55 | 158.9 | 60.0 |
Dalton Banks
|
G | 2 | 23.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 20 | 0.7 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.18 | 0 | 0 |
E. Washington
|
G | 15 | 14.1 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 3.5 | -8 | -0.3 | -1.2 | 38.9 | 33.3 | 62.5 | 0.12 | 83.6 | 44.4 |
A. Ndiaye
|
F | 17 | 9.6 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 4.1 | 22 | 0.9 | 3.8 | 20.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 0.27 | 106.8 | 20.0 |
H. Sissoko
|
- | 19 | 5.8 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 2.3 | -21 | -1.1 | -7.6 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.17 | 256.1 | 50.0 |
S. Wilbar
|
- | 2 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | -49 | -1.8 | -6.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.39 | 0 | 0 |
B. Newton
|
F | 1 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | -18 | -1.5 | -20.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.27 | 0 | 0 |
J. Johnson
|
- | 10 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 1.6 | -43 | -8.6 | -31.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.56 | 0 | 0 |
M. Miller
|
- | 10 | 5.3 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 44 | 2.4 | 3.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.4 | 100.0 | 0.0 |
K. Samb
|
- | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.19 | 0 | 0 |
A. Jabbar
|
- | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | -6 | -1.0 | -8.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.04 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Alston Andrews
|
F | 6 | 5.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.8 | -38 | -2.7 | -18.8 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -0.65 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
N. Stadelman
|
- | 6 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | -0.2 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG