🐻⬇️🏀

Chattanooga Mocs

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Also known as: Chattanooga Mocs
Program History

2026 Team Stats (28 games)

64.3
PPG
60.0
Opp
+4.3
Margin
42.0%
FG%
33.3%
3P%
74.3%
FT%
35.8
RPG
11.2
APG
15.3
TO
77.8
Pace
60.7
AdjO
65.8
AdjD
#222
Rank

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1045 (#153) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 980 (#188) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +113 elo More → 1005 (#174) HCA +113 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.3 More → -5.7 (#228) HCA +2.3
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.8 More → +9.2 (#211) HCA +2.8
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.612 (#133) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +3.8 More → 0.621 (#137) NetEff +3.8
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -5.5 More → 0.346 (#208) AdjNet -5.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -5.6 More → 0.343 (#206) AdjNet -5.6
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 60.7 | AdjD 65.8 More → 0.387 (#222) AdjO 60.7 | AdjD 65.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 65.2 | AdjD 60.8 More → 0.599 (#126) AdjO 65.2 | AdjD 60.8
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.705 (#196) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.689 (#186) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 122 | GP 28 More → 1054 (#168) RD 122 | GP 28

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-06 @ Florida Gators L 52 - 94
2025-11-09 @ Lipscomb Bisons W 59 - 56
2025-11-12 @ Troy Trojans L 56 - 73
2025-11-16 vs UAB Blazers L 66 - 79
2025-11-20 vs Austin Peay Governors L 54 - 68
2025-11-28 @ Sacramento State Hornets W 59 - 57
2025-12-07 vs Bellarmine Knights W 78 - 73
2025-12-11 @ Tennessee State Lady Tigers W 81 - 51
2025-12-19 vs Western Kentucky Lady Toppers W 59 - 58
2025-12-30 vs Southern Wesleyan Warriors W 97 - 46
2026-01-08 vs Wofford Terriers W 61 - 42
2026-01-10 vs Furman Paladins W 61 - 44
2026-01-17 @ East Tennessee State Bucs W 53 - 41
2026-01-22 @ UNC Greensboro Spartans W 52 - 40
2026-01-24 @ Western Carolina Catamounts W 61 - 52
2026-01-30 vs Mercer Bears W 72 - 59
2026-02-01 vs Samford Bulldogs W 61 - 40
2026-02-05 @ Furman Paladins W 62 - 54
2026-02-07 @ Wofford Terriers L 63 - 67
2026-02-14 vs East Tennessee State Bucs L 90 - 91
2026-02-19 vs Western Carolina Catamounts W 52 - 36
2026-02-21 vs UNC Greensboro Spartans W 56 - 54
2026-02-26 @ Samford Bulldogs L 70 - 77
2026-02-28 @ Mercer Bears L 55 - 68
2026-03-05 vs Western Carolina Catamounts W 66 - 47
2026-03-06 vs Furman Paladins W 76 - 65
2026-03-08 vs Samford Bulldogs L 67 - 72
2026-03-19 @ North Dakota State Bison L 62 - 75

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
C. Elisaldez C. Elisaldez G 28 36.5 17.0 3.1 5.0 1.4 0.1 4.0 12.9 9.8 90 4.3 4.9 48.9 30.6 78.3 1.76 56.4 51.0
G. Corbitt G. Corbitt F 28 29.9 15.3 8.5 1.2 2.3 0.7 2.4 11.4 14.3 101 4.8 6.4 49.4 41.1 84.2 2.67 61.0 57.4
K. Ford K. Ford G 22 23.9 7.6 3.8 1.1 1.4 0.1 1.9 7.5 4.6 52 2.9 4.4 36.1 26.8 78.3 0.05 44.8 39.5
I. McPherson I. McPherson G 28 27.9 7.5 3.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 1.2 7.9 3.5 106 5.0 8.7 33.8 30.3 65.2 -0.04 45.5 44.1
A. Card A. Card G 28 26.8 6.3 4.7 0.9 0.6 0.3 1.5 6.9 4.5 58 2.8 4.9 37.0 29.5 60.0 0.83 44.1 43.0
S. Owona S. Owona G 28 16.2 4.2 2.3 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.8 3.8 2.9 36 1.7 3.8 40.6 43.3 40.0 -2.27 53.9 54.2
F. van der Schans F. van der Schans F 28 15.9 3.0 2.9 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.8 2.3 4.4 -22 -1.0 -3.0 50.0 33.3 75.0 -3.27 58.4 54.7
F. Bedke F. Bedke F 28 17.1 2.7 2.8 0.6 0.6 0.1 1.3 2.7 2.8 79 3.8 8.7 38.7 0 63.0 -0.98 43.2 38.7
L. Weaver L. Weaver G 22 8.0 1.5 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.5 1.7 0.5 3 0.2 0.9 27.0 23.8 58.3 -2.7 37.8 33.8
E. Bruce E. Bruce F 23 6.3 1.0 1.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.5 73 3.8 18.6 28.0 16.7 63.6 2.13 36.9 30.0
K. Wilson K. Wilson G 11 3.3 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.2 -0.4 13 0.6 0.9 23.1 0.0 50.0 3.25 25.2 23.1

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG