Furman Paladins

Season: 2027 preview 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

Also known as: Furman Paladins

Program History

2026 Team Stats (31 games)

67.6

PPG

61.3

Opp

+6.4

Margin

40.8%

FG%

32.4%

3P%

63.1%

FT%

39.7

RPG

13.1

APG

17.9

73.1

Est. poss./game

60.6

Adj PPG

67.7

Adj Opp PPG

#252

Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2025-2026

Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model	Output	Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More →	904 (#228)	-
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More →	936 (#222)	-
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +106 elo More →	988 (#197)	HCA +106 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.4 More →	-7.9 (#255)	HCA +2.4
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.6 More →	-6.3 (#241)	HCA +2.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More →	0.377 (#217)	-
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -3.7 More →	0.377 (#217)	NetEff -3.7
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -10.1 More →	0.237 (#244)	AdjNet -10.1
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -10.3 More →	0.231 (#246)	AdjNet -10.3
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 60.6 \| AdjD 67.7 More →	0.343 (#252)	AdjO 60.6 \| AdjD 67.7
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 61.7 \| AdjD 63.0 More →	0.470 (#197)	AdjO 61.7 \| AdjD 63.0
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More →	0.354 (#238)	Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More →	0.378 (#229)	Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 151 \| GP 27 More →	962 (#204)	RD 151 \| GP 27

2026 Schedule & Results

Date	Vs/At	Opponent	Result	Score
2025-11-03	vs	North Greenville Trailblazers	W	85 - 27
2025-11-06	@	Georgia Lady Bulldogs	L	45 - 91
2025-11-10	@	Vanderbilt Commodores	L	48 - 96
2025-11-13	vs	Georgia State Panthers	W	90 - 89
2025-11-16	vs	Campbell Fighting Camels	L	61 - 68
2025-11-19	@	Radford Highlanders	L	50 - 68
2025-11-23	vs	Clemson Tigers	L	58 - 76
2025-11-29	vs	UNC Asheville Bulldogs	W	74 - 67
2025-12-03	vs	Presbyterian Blue Hose	W	74 - 56
2025-12-07	@	Georgia Southern Eagles	L	56 - 72
2025-12-14	vs	Mars Hill Mountain Lions	W	110 - 36
2025-12-19	@	Charleston Southern Buccaneers	W	66 - 53
2025-12-28	@	Florida Gators	L	66 - 82
2025-12-30	vs	Brevard Tornados	W	110 - 54
2026-01-03	vs	Bob Jones Bruins	W	106 - 21
2026-01-08	@	East Tennessee State Buccaneers	W	72 - 70
2026-01-10	@	Chattanooga Mocs	L	44 - 61
2026-01-15	vs	UNC Greensboro Spartans	W	69 - 56
2026-01-17	vs	Western Carolina Catamounts	W	69 - 38
2026-01-22	@	Mercer Bears	W	60 - 49
2026-01-24	@	Samford Bulldogs	W	70 - 62
2026-01-30	@	Wofford Terriers	W	65 - 64
2026-02-05	vs	Chattanooga Mocs	L	54 - 62
2026-02-07	vs	East Tennessee State Buccaneers	L	55 - 58
2026-02-12	@	Western Carolina Catamounts	W	60 - 51
2026-02-14	@	UNC Greensboro Spartans	W	63 - 61
2026-02-19	vs	Samford Bulldogs	L	59 - 68
2026-02-21	vs	Mercer Bears	L	63 - 80
2026-02-28	vs	Wofford Terriers	W	64 - 42
2026-03-05	vs	Mercer Bears	W	66 - 45
2026-03-06	@	Chattanooga Mocs	L	65 - 76

2026 Roster

Show Alumni

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player	Pos	GP	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FGA	Numbers	PM	PM GP	PM/G	PM/40	FG%	3P%	FT%	RAPM	TS%	eFG%
Clare Coyle	F	31	31.6	14.8	9.1	1.6	2.0	1.4	2.2	11.3	15.4	193	26	7.4	10.1	54.7	0.0	53.6	5.7	55.6	54.7
Alyssa Ervin	G	31	28.0	13.8	3.1	1.3	1.6	0.7	1.9	11.2	7.5	165	26	6.3	9.7	40.9	35.1	72.8	1.63	53.2	48.6
Raina McGowens	G	31	29.4	9.1	5.0	1.8	1.8	0.5	2.7	8.6	6.8	142	26	5.5	8.2	32.2	20.5	66.2	-1.67	42.1	33.7
Chantelle Stuart	G	27	25.3	7.3	3.5	4.5	1.5	0.2	3.5	7.9	5.6	41	23	1.8	3.1	33.0	27.1	70.5	-2.12	41.0	36.1
Lauren Bailey	G	26	25.0	6.2	2.7	0.7	1.0	0.2	1.6	5.7	3.5	98	22	4.5	8.0	35.8	37.3	60.0	-1.6	53.1	52.7
Sophia Pearl	G	31	19.5	5.5	1.9	2.2	1.0	0.0	2.0	5.3	3.3	77	26	3.0	6.4	37.8	32.4	75.0	-3.72	48.0	44.8
Kyraha Parnell	F	23	18.7	4.5	4.0	1.2	0.8	0.4	1.2	4.5	5.2	24	19	1.3	3.0	38.5	29.4	61.5	-1.39	46.9	45.7
Brooklyn King	G	22	17.2	3.9	3.8	0.5	1.3	0.7	1.6	4.4	4.1	80	19	4.2	10.1	34.4	30.0	50.0	0.57	40.6	39.1
Channing Warren	F	14	12.4	3.7	2.0	0.3	0.1	0.6	0.9	2.6	3.3	-49	12	-4.1	-15.3	59.5	0.0	72.7	-4.24	62.1	59.5
Samaria Taylor	G	27	10.4	3.0	1.4	0.3	0.9	0.0	0.7	3.0	2.1	23	24	1.0	3.5	37.0	20.0	50.0	-4.6	41.6	38.3
Tyriana Berry	F	24	7.5	2.5	2.3	0.1	0.3	0.3	0.7	2.1	2.7	28	19	1.5	8.3	51.0	0	36.8	-0.8	49.7	51.0
Hilary Englert	G	13	6.3	1.5	0.9	0.0	0.2	0.1	0.2	1.2	1.2	63	11	5.7	32.0	50.0	75.0	0	0.53	59.4	59.4
Hanna Hansson	F	0	-	0.0	0.0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asa Snyder	G	0	-	0.0	0.0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2025-2026 Shot Zones

1874 located field-goal attempts in 31 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Points: who the team's points here most likely come from

Misses: who misses most here

Clare CoyleAlyssa ErvinRaina McGowensLauren BaileyChantelle Stuart

Zone	FGM-FGA	FG%	Pts	Top scorer	Runner-up	Most misses	Runner-up
Restricted area	280-483	58.0	560	Clare Coyle 36% (200 pts)	Raina McGowens 11% (64 pts)	Clare Coyle 29% (58 misses)	Raina McGowens 19% (39 misses)
Paint (non-RA)	211-524	40.3	422	Clare Coyle 33% (140 pts)	Alyssa Ervin 17% (70 pts)	Clare Coyle 22% (68 misses)	Raina McGowens 22% (68 misses)
Mid-range left	37-112	33.0	74	Raina McGowens 30% (22 pts)	Alyssa Ervin 27% (20 pts)	Raina McGowens 23% (17 misses)	Alyssa Ervin 20% (15 misses)
Mid-range center	19-56	33.9	38	Clare Coyle 37% (14 pts)	Alyssa Ervin 16% (6 pts)	Chantelle Stuart 22% (8 misses)	Clare Coyle 19% (7 misses)
Mid-range right	41-155	26.5	82	Alyssa Ervin 32% (26 pts)	Clare Coyle 20% (16 pts)	Alyssa Ervin 32% (36 misses)	Chantelle Stuart 17% (19 misses)
Left corner 3	19-50	38.0	57	Lauren Bailey 37% (21 pts)	Alyssa Ervin 26% (15 pts)	Alyssa Ervin 32% (10 misses)	Raina McGowens 16% (5 misses)
Right corner 3	16-40	40.0	48	Alyssa Ervin 50% (24 pts)	Lauren Bailey 19% (9 pts)	Alyssa Ervin 25% (6 misses)	Lauren Bailey 21% (5 misses)
Above-break 3 left	51-186	27.4	153	Lauren Bailey 31% (48 pts)	Alyssa Ervin 16% (24 pts)	Lauren Bailey 29% (39 misses)	Alyssa Ervin 19% (26 misses)
Above-break 3 center	27-89	30.3	81	Alyssa Ervin 30% (24 pts)	Sophia Pearl 26% (21 pts)	Alyssa Ervin 29% (18 misses)	Lauren Bailey 16% (10 misses)
Above-break 3 right	63-179	35.2	189	Alyssa Ervin 38% (72 pts)	Lauren Bailey 30% (57 pts)	Alyssa Ervin 33% (38 misses)	Lauren Bailey 22% (26 misses)