Cal State Northridge
2013 Team Stats (2 games)
83.5
PPG
74.5
Opp
+0.8
Margin
43.0%
FG%
37.5%
3P%
76.2%
FT%
37.5
RPG
15.0
APG
12.5
TO
90.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2012-2013
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1210 (#213) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1165 (#260) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 948 (#495) | HCA +147 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +17.6 (#285) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +1.1 (#294) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.506 (#55) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.569 (#83) | NetEff +2.5 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.189 (#97) | AdjNet -12.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.175 (#99) | AdjNet -13.6 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.451 (#428) | AdjO 69.8 | AdjD 71.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.553 (#250) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.511 (#261) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 946 (#263) | RD 154 | GP 32 |
2013 Schedule & Results
2013 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S. Hicks
|
G | 27 | 30.7 | 15.7 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 3.2 | 20.7 | -47 | -1.7 | -2.5 | 47.1 | 35.7 | 83.3 | -0.06 | 191.9 | 50.0 |
S. Maxwell
|
F | 31 | 27.9 | 14.6 | 8.3 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 20.5 | -1 | -0.0 | -0.1 | 53.8 | 0 | 75.0 | 0.1 | 233.2 | 53.8 |
J. Greene
|
G | 30 | 32.2 | 14.5 | 2.8 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 17.7 | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 35.2 | 39.5 | 91.7 | -0.04 | 209.0 | 43.8 |
B. Perry
|
F | 29 | 14.6 | 6.3 | 3.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 9.0 | 83 | 2.9 | 7.2 | 61.1 | 0 | 67.7 | 0.92 | 183.3 | 61.1 |
T. Williams
|
F | 31 | 18.9 | 5.8 | 3.5 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 8.7 | 56 | 1.8 | 3.4 | 36.5 | 29.4 | 100.0 | 0.77 | 166.5 | 41.3 |
L. Drew
|
G | 30 | 19.2 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 3.8 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 8.7 | 81 | 2.7 | 5.4 | 41.2 | 18.2 | 75.0 | 0.76 | 241.9 | 44.1 |
A. Guei
|
G | 30 | 20.1 | 5.2 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 7.3 | -70 | -2.3 | -5.1 | 37.8 | 28.6 | 75.0 | -0.28 | 155.1 | 40.0 |
T. Hale-Edmerson
|
F | 31 | 17.2 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 9.6 | -93 | -3.0 | -8.0 | 45.0 | 0.0 | 68.4 | -0.86 | 155.1 | 45.0 |
D. Johnson
|
G-F | 29 | 13.4 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 3.9 | 147 | 4.7 | 13.7 | 19.0 | 14.3 | 50.0 | 0.77 | 226.2 | 21.4 |
L. Watson
|
- | 19 | 10.7 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 3.9 | -10 | -0.5 | -1.8 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | -0.02 | 2000.0 | 100.0 |
M. Tilford
|
F | 15 | 8.1 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 2.9 | 48 | 3.0 | 11.2 | 42.9 | 0 | 37.5 | 0.63 | 95.1 | 42.9 |
I. Clark
|
- | 11 | 4.4 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.6 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1.89 | 650.0 | 0.0 |
I. Ilyayev
|
- | 10 | 3.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 16 | 1.3 | 7.7 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.24 | 159.6 | 150.0 |
J. Mitchell
|
- | 6 | 2.8 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 123 | 4.0 | 8.1 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 | 50.0 | 50.0 |
I. Godfrey
|
G | 3 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG