Cal Poly
2020 Team Stats (3 games)
59.0
PPG
78.0
Opp
-19.0
Margin
40.4%
FG%
34.0%
3P%
53.2%
FT%
29.0
RPG
7.7
APG
18.3
TO
-
Est. poss./game
65.1
Adj PPG
74.3
Adj Opp PPG
#312
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2019-2020
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 611 (#341) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 741 (#334) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 827 (#333) | HCA +96 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | -9.6 (#310) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | -8.9 (#301) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.175 (#329) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.161 (#307) | AdjNet -14.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.159 (#307) | AdjNet -14.4 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.302 (#312) | AdjO 65.1 | AdjD 74.3 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.340 (#316) | AdjO 68.3 | AdjD 75.6 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.211 (#324) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.217 (#324) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 705 (#333) | RD 97 | GP 28 |
2020 Schedule & Results
2020 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y. Wetzell
|
- | 1 | 27.0 | 12.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 20.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
C. Hunter
|
- | 2 | 33.0 | 12.0 | 5.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 18.5 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Junior Ballard
|
- | 3 | 24.7 | 10.3 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 12.0 | 0.7 | -103 | 27 | -3.8 | -5.9 | 30.6 | 27.3 | 85.7 | 2.72 | 39.7 | 34.7 |
Colby Rogers
|
G | 22 | 23.0 | 9.0 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 9.6 | -134 | 27 | -5.0 | -9.7 | 32.6 | 27.8 | 66.7 | -1.45 | 218.0 | 38.4 |
Tuukka Jaakkola
|
- | 29 | 22.0 | 7.1 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 10.1 | -138 | 27 | -5.1 | -10.1 | 64.5 | 0.0 | 57.7 | -0.72 | 241.5 | 64.5 |
Jamal Smith
|
G | 3 | 22.0 | 7.0 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 4.3 | 3.0 | -99 | 27 | -3.7 | -6.9 | 53.8 | 33.3 | 62.5 | 1.24 | 63.6 | 61.5 |
Mark Crowe
|
G | 3 | 9.7 | 5.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 4.0 | -94 | 27 | -3.5 | -9.6 | 75.0 | 71.4 | 0.0 | -2.87 | 95.7 | 106.2 |
Kyle Colvin
|
F | 3 | 25.0 | 5.7 | 4.3 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 6.0 | 2.7 | -127 | 23 | -5.5 | -11.7 | 38.9 | 33.3 | 0.0 | -2.32 | 45.0 | 47.2 |
Alimamy Koroma
|
- | 25 | 14.8 | 5.3 | 3.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 7.7 | -81 | 23 | -3.5 | -11.1 | 47.4 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.58 | 273.9 | 47.4 |
Job Alexander
|
G | 22 | 16.5 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 6.5 | -124 | 27 | -4.6 | -13.5 | 46.2 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -2.93 | 252.9 | 46.2 |
Hank Hollingsworth
|
F | 3 | 10.7 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 4.7 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2.79 | 0 | 0 |
Keith Smith
|
G | 3 | 21.0 | 2.0 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 5.3 | -174 | 26 | -6.7 | -12.4 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -3.73 | 30.7 | 25.0 |
Malek Harwell
|
F | 2 | 17.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | -1.5 | -131 | 22 | -6.0 | -12.7 | 16.7 | 25.0 | 0.0 | -2.02 | 23.3 | 25.0 |
Colin McCarthy
|
G | 9 | 4.2 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.0 | -6 | 10 | -0.6 | -7.2 | 33.3 | 0 | 25.0 | -1.01 | 94.5 | 33.3 |
Jared Rice
|
G | 2 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -9 | 6 | -1.5 | -31.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2.56 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG