Cal Poly
2020 Team Stats (3 games)
59.0
PPG
77.0
Opp
-16.0
Margin
40.4%
FG%
34.0%
3P%
53.2%
FT%
29.0
RPG
7.7
APG
18.3
TO
79.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2019-2020
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1039 (#266) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 970 (#498) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +15.1 (#329) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.055 (#106) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.501 (#58) | AdjNet +0.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.504 (#58) | AdjNet +0.2 |
2020 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | @ | North Dakota State Bison | L | 67 - 74 |
| 2019-11-17 | @ | Saint Mary's Gaels | L | 48 - 79 |
| 2019-11-28 | vs | Tennessee State Tigers | L | 72 - 82 |
| 2019-12-28 | @ | San Diego State Aztecs | L | 57 - 73 |
2020 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Y. Wetzell
|
- | 1 | 27.0 | 12.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 20.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
J. Ballard
|
- | 3 | 24.7 | 10.3 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 12.0 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 30.6 | 27.3 | 85.7 | - | 39.7 | 34.7 |
T. Jaakkola
|
- | 4 | 26.5 | 10.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 4.5 | 9.8 | - | - | - | 55.6 | 0.0 | 58.8 | - | 78.5 | 55.6 |
C. Rogers
|
G | 4 | 21.0 | 8.8 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 7.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 35.7 | 30.8 | 50.0 | -0.0 | 60.6 | 42.9 |
J. Smith
|
G | 3 | 22.0 | 7.0 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 31 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 53.8 | 33.3 | 62.5 | 0.35 | 63.6 | 61.5 |
M. Crowe
|
G | 3 | 9.7 | 5.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 75.0 | 71.4 | 0.0 | - | 95.7 | 106.2 |
K. Colvin
|
F | 3 | 25.0 | 5.7 | 4.3 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 6.0 | 2.7 | - | - | - | 38.9 | 33.3 | 0.0 | - | 45.0 | 47.2 |
A. Koroma
|
- | 3 | 17.7 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 3.7 | 4.7 | - | - | - | 36.4 | 0.0 | 57.1 | - | 42.6 | 36.4 |
J. Alexander
|
G | 4 | 14.5 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 14 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 50.0 | 0 | 50.0 | 0.08 | 56.4 | 50.0 |
K. Smith
|
G | 3 | 21.0 | 2.0 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 5.3 | -14 | -1.8 | -7.4 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.2 | 30.7 | 25.0 |
M. Harwell
|
F | 2 | 17.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | -1.5 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 25.0 | 0.0 | - | 23.3 | 25.0 |
C. McCarthy
|
G | 2 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 25.0 | - | 39.9 | 50.0 |
H. Hollingsworth
|
F | 1 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
J. Rice
|
G | 2 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 17 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG