San Antonio Spurs
Model Outputs
2001-2002
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1211 (#1) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1241 (#1) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +8.7 (#2) | HCA +3.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.775 (#2) | - |
2002 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-03-14 | vs | CHI | W | 91 - 86 |
| 2002-03-16 | vs | BOS | W | 111 - 104 |
| 2002-03-20 | vs | LAL | W | 108 - 90 |
| 2002-03-21 | @ | DAL | W | 105 - 102 |
| 2002-03-23 | vs | MIA | W | 89 - 79 |
| 2002-03-25 | @ | LAC | W | 91 - 85 |
| 2002-03-27 | @ | POR | L | 93 - 98 |
| 2002-03-29 | @ | SEA | L | 76 - 79 |
| 2002-03-31 | @ | LAL | L | 95 - 96 |
| 2002-04-03 | vs | SEA | W | 90 - 88 |
| 2002-04-04 | @ | HOU | W | 102 - 78 |
| 2002-04-06 | vs | DAL | W | 89 - 87 |
| 2002-04-08 | vs | POR | W | 99 - 87 |
| 2002-04-10 | vs | DEN | W | 87 - 79 |
| 2002-04-12 | @ | DET | W | 96 - 86 |
| 2002-04-13 | @ | MEM | W | 113 - 92 |
| 2002-04-16 | vs | PHX | W | 95 - 71 |
| 2002-04-17 | @ | UTA | W | 86 - 84 |
2002 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tim Duncan
|
G | 18 | 39.3 | 27.6 | 12.5 | 4.3 | 0.9 | 2.4 | 3.2 | 18.8 | 25.8 | - | - | - | 54.6 | 50.0 | 76.7 | - | 60.4 | 54.7 |
| David Robinson | G | 15 | 29.7 | 13.7 | 8.7 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 8.4 | 16.1 | - | - | - | 56.3 | 0 | 71.6 | - | 62.2 | 56.3 |
Tony Parker
|
G | 18 | 31.4 | 10.3 | 2.4 | 5.3 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 9.2 | 8.8 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 30.4 | 56.4 | - | 51.1 | 49.7 |
| Malik Rose | G | 18 | 20.5 | 9.9 | 6.2 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1.7 | 8.0 | 8.2 | - | - | - | 46.5 | 0 | 66.7 | - | 51.4 | 46.5 |
| Steven Smith | G | 13 | 24.6 | 9.8 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 7.7 | 4.6 | - | - | - | 46.0 | 33.3 | 80.0 | - | 56.5 | 52.0 |
| Bruce Bowen | G | 18 | 32.7 | 7.8 | 3.4 | 2.1 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 6.9 | 7.1 | - | - | - | 44.8 | 32.6 | 50.0 | - | 51.3 | 50.8 |
| Antonio Daniels | G | 18 | 22.8 | 7.5 | 1.8 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 6.3 | 5.4 | - | - | - | 43.4 | 20.7 | 66.0 | - | 50.5 | 46.0 |
| Danny Ferry | G | 18 | 18.8 | 5.5 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 3.9 | 5.8 | - | - | - | 45.7 | 45.7 | 100.0 | - | 63.2 | 57.1 |
| Terry Porter | G | 9 | 14.7 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 3.9 | 3.4 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 30.8 | 66.7 | - | 47.8 | 45.7 |
| Charles Smith | G | 13 | 12.4 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 4.5 | 2.2 | - | - | - | 34.5 | 0 | 70.0 | - | 37.7 | 34.5 |
| Jason Hart | G | 8 | 9.5 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 3.4 | - | - | - | 52.6 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 60.1 | 52.6 |
| Amal McCaskill | F | 1 | 12.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 14.3 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 19.0 | 14.3 |
| Mark Bryant | G | 11 | 7.7 | 2.6 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.3 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 52.0 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 54.2 | 52.0 |
| Cherokee Parks | - | 7 | 2.4 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 44.4 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 40.5 | 44.4 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG