🐻⬇️🏀

Nebraska Cornhuskers

Also known as: Nebraska Cornhuskers
Program History

2026 Team Stats (29 games)

76.6
PPG
67.0
Opp
+9.6
Margin
46.7%
FG%
34.9%
3P%
79.4%
FT%
33.1
RPG
17.8
APG
14.1
TO
81.7
Pace
83.4
AdjO
58.1
AdjD
#23
Rank

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1113 (#109) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1209 (#61) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +113 elo More → 990 (#402) HCA +113 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.3 More → +25.7 (#23) HCA +2.3
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.8 More → +32.9 (#34) HCA +2.8
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.857 (#46) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +19.4 More → 0.904 (#43) NetEff +19.4
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +37.1 More → 0.987 (#25) AdjNet +37.1
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +38.3 More → 0.988 (#25) AdjNet +38.3
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 83.4 | AdjD 58.1 More → 0.909 (#23) AdjO 83.4 | AdjD 58.1
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 73.0 | AdjD 61.6 More → 0.738 (#44) AdjO 73.0 | AdjD 61.6
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.948 (#37) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.925 (#37) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 119 | GP 29 More → 1151 (#97) RD 119 | GP 29

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-08 vs Samford Bulldogs W 80 - 46
2025-11-12 vs Creighton Bluejays W 84 - 50
2025-11-16 vs North Dakota State Bison W 82 - 70
2025-11-19 vs Oral Roberts Golden Eagles W 103 - 58
2025-11-24 @ Purdue Fort Wayne Mastodons W 80 - 57
2025-12-03 vs Bradley Braves W 92 - 53
2025-12-09 vs Omaha Mavericks W 87 - 35
2025-12-14 vs Illinois State Redbirds W 85 - 44
2025-12-21 vs California Baptist Lancers W 87 - 56
2025-12-29 vs USC Trojans L 66 - 74
2026-01-01 @ Iowa Hawkeyes L 76 - 86
2026-01-04 vs Purdue Boilermakers W 78 - 62
2026-01-08 vs Indiana Hoosiers W 78 - 73
2026-01-11 vs UCLA Bruins L 61 - 83
2026-01-15 @ Michigan State Spartans L 71 - 73
2026-01-21 @ Wisconsin Badgers L 60 - 63
2026-01-24 vs Illinois Fighting Illini W 81 - 75
2026-01-28 vs Northwestern Wildcats W 89 - 73
2026-02-01 @ Ohio State Buckeyes L 71 - 90
2026-02-04 @ Michigan Wolverines L 76 - 88
2026-02-07 vs Maryland Terrapins L 60 - 78
2026-02-12 @ Minnesota Golden Gophers L 67 - 84
2026-02-16 vs Iowa Hawkeyes L 67 - 80
2026-02-19 @ Oregon Ducks L 76 - 80
2026-02-22 @ Washington Huskies W 66 - 65
2026-02-28 vs Rutgers Scarlet Knights W 93 - 52
2026-03-04 vs Indiana Hoosiers L 69 - 72
2026-03-18 vs Richmond Spiders W 75 - 56
2026-03-20 @ Baylor Bears L 62 - 67

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
B. Prince B. Prince G 29 32.6 17.3 4.1 4.4 1.6 0.6 2.9 12.3 12.8 32 1.3 1.8 52.7 44.6 92.8 0.49 62.9 57.8
A. Hargrove A. Hargrove F 28 24.5 12.4 5.5 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.7 9.4 9.3 110 4.8 8.8 52.9 38.5 78.7 1.38 59.7 56.7
J. Petrie J. Petrie F 27 23.1 11.4 4.7 1.5 1.0 1.1 1.9 9.9 8.0 82 3.7 6.8 45.1 29.9 76.4 2.98 53.1 50.0
L. Nissley L. Nissley G 27 22.9 9.1 2.5 2.2 0.6 0.1 1.3 6.7 6.5 25 1.1 2.8 45.1 42.8 84.6 0.58 63.3 61.3
E. Maupin E. Maupin F 24 17.9 7.6 4.3 1.0 0.6 0.7 1.8 5.4 7.1 28 1.3 3.5 52.7 30.4 76.9 -0.76 60.2 55.4
C. Hake C. Hake G 29 27.9 7.0 2.7 3.4 1.2 0.2 1.6 6.1 6.8 61 2.5 4.0 36.7 34.7 91.4 1.38 53.0 48.6
P. Bozan P. Bozan F 29 14.6 6.2 3.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 1.2 5.4 4.7 43 1.8 3.8 49.7 20.8 62.5 -0.19 52.9 51.3
C. Johnson C. Johnson G 28 10.9 3.1 0.8 0.9 0.4 0.0 0.6 2.7 2.0 82 3.6 10.9 40.0 20.5 70.4 3.84 50.1 45.3
K. Williams K. Williams G 29 15.6 2.4 0.9 2.6 1.0 0.0 0.9 2.4 3.5 51 2.1 6.5 35.2 23.8 66.7 1.39 45.1 42.3
H. Weaver H. Weaver G 28 11.3 1.9 1.6 0.8 0.9 0.3 0.7 2.3 2.5 63 2.6 6.2 28.1 33.3 58.8 2.08 37.8 34.4
A. Neale A. Neale G 7 4.7 1.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.4 1.3 0.3 -20 -2.5 -27.1 44.4 25.0 100.0 -1.81 53.0 50.0
E. Fisher E. Fisher G 23 6.9 1.3 1.3 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.5 1.0 2.0 35 2.3 14.3 45.5 25.0 66.7 3.29 54.2 47.7
A. Weidner A. Weidner G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
N. Potts N. Potts F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG