Arizona
2011 Team Stats (20 games)
75.5
PPG
67.9
Opp
+8.5
Margin
45.0%
FG%
38.2%
3P%
75.2%
FT%
34.7
RPG
13.5
APG
11.9
TO
78.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1884 (#6) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1609 (#13) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1041 (#361) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +40.2 (#7) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.696 (#19) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.605 (#74) | NetEff +3.9 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.827 (#21) | AdjNet +13.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.830 (#21) | AdjNet +13.7 |
2011 Schedule & Results
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D. Williams
|
F | 25 | 31.1 | 19.5 | 8.8 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 2.9 | 9.3 | 18.8 | -19 | -19.0 | -345.5 | 57.1 | 49.0 | 73.4 | -0.9 | 81.0 | 62.2 |
L. Jones
|
G | 25 | 27.0 | 11.1 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 7.8 | 6.3 | 1 | 1.0 | 7.5 | 41.3 | 35.1 | 81.4 | 0.52 | 61.1 | 46.4 |
K. Fogg
|
G | 25 | 26.6 | 8.6 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 5.7 | 7.1 | - | - | - | 40.1 | 39.3 | 71.2 | - | 65.2 | 51.8 |
S. Hill
|
F | 25 | 25.9 | 7.6 | 4.9 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 5.4 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 43.3 | 17.9 | 82.2 | - | 62.1 | 45.1 |
K. Parrom
|
G-F | 25 | 20.4 | 7.4 | 3.2 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 4.7 | 7.6 | - | - | - | 48.3 | 42.0 | 69.0 | - | 67.4 | 57.2 |
J. Perry
|
F | 25 | 21.0 | 7.0 | 4.5 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 4.4 | 7.6 | - | - | - | 46.8 | 33.3 | 79.6 | -1.24 | 66.0 | 49.1 |
J. Horne
|
F | 25 | 18.2 | 5.4 | 3.2 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 3.8 | 5.4 | - | - | - | 38.9 | 34.5 | 70.6 | - | 65.9 | 48.9 |
J. Mayes
|
G | 25 | 13.8 | 4.6 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 3.4 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 46.8 | 50.0 | - | 63.7 | 56.0 |
D. Bejarano
|
G | 1 | 10.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 150.0 | 150.0 |
B. Lavender
|
G | 25 | 9.5 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 2.6 | - | - | - | 35.7 | 40.0 | 69.2 | - | 74.4 | 50.0 |
M. Wiepking
|
F | 2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 75.0 | 75.0 |
K. Natyazhko
|
C | 25 | 7.9 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 52.4 | 25.0 | 100.0 | - | 59.3 | 54.8 |
A. Jacobson
|
C | 11 | 3.9 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | -0.1 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 40.0 | 40.0 |
D. Wise
|
G | 1 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
R. Arvizu
|
G | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG