🐻⬇️🏀

Alabama A&M

Also known as: Alabama A&M Bulldogs
Program History

2013 Team Stats (2 games)

73.5
PPG
69.7
Opp
-6.6
Margin
41.7%
FG%
36.4%
3P%
60.4%
FT%
41.0
RPG
13.0
APG
17.0
TO
91.1
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1042 (#308) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 943 (#789) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 894 (#557) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +9.5 (#427) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → -3.8 (#370) HCA +3.3
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +1.9 More → 0.559 (#86) NetEff +1.9
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 61.7 | AdjD 67.0 More → 0.381 (#537) AdjO 61.7 | AdjD 67.0
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.298 (#441) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.303 (#457) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 134 | GP 31 More → 779 (#560) RD 134 | GP 31

2013 Schedule & Results

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
D. Tabb D. Tabb G 31 32.3 14.0 9.9 1.3 1.3 1.6 2.1 7.3 18.6 -156 -5.2 -8.1 48.2 0.0 60.5 -0.71 77.2 48.2
J. Crutcher J. Crutcher G 29 35.0 12.0 3.0 4.9 0.9 0.0 2.9 6.7 11.3 -125 -4.3 -5.5 42.5 45.9 55.8 -0.35 75.6 49.7
B. Ellis B. Ellis G 30 28.8 10.7 3.1 0.7 0.9 0.3 2.2 7.0 6.6 -185 -6.2 -9.8 41.0 34.9 66.0 -1.2 69.0 48.1
G. Hill G. Hill G 31 26.3 7.6 2.4 2.1 1.2 0.0 2.0 3.9 7.4 -109 -3.5 -6.3 42.6 35.0 79.3 -0.64 80.3 45.5
J. Banks J. Banks C 31 19.9 5.7 5.4 0.3 0.2 0.9 1.2 2.9 8.3 -137 -4.4 -11.0 64.0 0 85.2 -1.25 87.7 64.0
A. Capers A. Capers F 10 12.2 3.0 1.9 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.8 2.8 2.0 -39 -3.9 -11.7 32.1 11.1 42.9 -0.57 48.3 33.9
J. Long J. Long G 30 19.7 2.9 3.8 1.2 0.5 0.2 0.8 2.4 5.3 -95 -3.2 -6.5 26.8 19.2 50.0 -0.45 52.2 30.3
J. Colvin J. Colvin G 24 10.0 2.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.8 2.3 0.9 -10 -0.4 -1.1 30.9 35.5 53.8 -0.22 54.3 40.9
N. West N. West F 26 8.4 2.8 1.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.5 2.8 -68 -2.5 -10.6 26.3 25.9 75.0 -0.45 90.5 35.5
J. Wagner J. Wagner G-F 25 8.9 2.8 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.4 1.8 1.6 -61 -2.4 -9.0 41.3 34.8 61.1 -0.64 64.0 50.0
Tajden Davis Tajden Davis G 29 13.6 2.6 1.1 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.9 1.7 2.3 16 0.2 0.6 36.7 32.3 63.6 -0.32 68.7 46.9
B. Houston B. Houston G 14 6.3 1.7 1.5 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 2.0 1.0 -31 -2.2 -10.8 32.1 17.6 0.0 -0.48 41.6 37.5
A. Lanier A. Lanier - 12 6.4 1.3 1.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.0 1.7 -9 -0.8 -2.3 33.3 0 50.0 0.07 58.1 33.3
D. Basil D. Basil - 2 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 - - - 50.0 0 0 - 50.0 50.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG