🐻⬇️🏀

Yale

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Also known as: Yale Bulldogs, Yale
Program History
Coach: James Jones

2013 Team Stats (9 games)

65.1
PPG
64.4
Opp
+0.6
Margin
39.8%
FG%
34.6%
3P%
73.6%
FT%
34.1
RPG
11.7
APG
14.6
TO
77.9
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1507 (#68) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1369 (#106) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 982 (#443) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +26.8 (#119) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → +9.7 (#150) HCA +3.3
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.311 (#92) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -6.4 More → 0.323 (#136) NetEff -6.4
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -19.0 More → 0.101 (#106) AdjNet -19.0
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -19.1 More → 0.100 (#106) AdjNet -19.1
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 68.2 | AdjD 64.5 More → 0.583 (#117) AdjO 68.2 | AdjD 64.5
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.644 (#191) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.631 (#184) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 150 | GP 30 More → 990 (#221) RD 150 | GP 30

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-11-10 vs Sacred Heart Pioneers L 82 - 85
2012-11-12 @ Saint Joseph's Hawks L 35 - 61
2012-11-16 @ Evansville Purple Aces L 56 - 66
2012-11-17 vs Buffalo Bulls T 0 - 0
2012-11-18 @ Western Illinois Leathernecks L 47 - 59
2012-11-21 @ Vermont Catamounts L 52 - 65
2012-11-24 vs Army Black Knights W 86 - 83
2012-11-29 vs Hartford Hawks L 51 - 60
2012-12-05 @ Bryant Bulldogs W 64 - 62
2012-12-08 @ New Hampshire Wildcats L 56 - 64
2012-12-18 vs Albertus Magnus Falcons W 112 - 63
2012-12-28 @ Nevada Wolf Pack L 75 - 85
2012-12-30 @ Saint Mary's Gaels L 62 - 78
2013-01-01 @ Iowa State Cyclones L 70 - 80
2013-01-04 @ Holy Cross Crusaders W 61 - 54
2013-01-06 vs Florida Gators L 58 - 79
2013-01-12 vs Oberlin College Yeomen W 104 - 39
2013-01-19 @ Brown Bears L 51 - 65
2013-01-26 vs Brown Bears W 76 - 64
2013-02-01 @ Harvard Crimson L 64 - 67
2013-02-02 @ Dartmouth Big Green L 62 - 71
2013-02-08 @ Pennsylvania Quakers W 68 - 59
2013-02-09 @ Princeton Tigers W 69 - 65
2013-02-15 vs Cornell Big Red L 61 - 68
2013-02-16 vs Columbia Lions W 75 - 56
2013-02-22 vs Dartmouth Big Green W 78 - 67
2013-02-23 vs Harvard Crimson L 66 - 72
2013-03-01 @ Columbia Lions L 46 - 59
2013-03-02 @ Cornell Big Red W 79 - 70
2013-03-08 vs Princeton Tigers W 71 - 66
2013-03-09 vs Pennsylvania Quakers W 79 - 65

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
A. Morgan A. Morgan G 31 30.2 10.9 1.5 1.9 1.1 0.0 2.0 3.4 10.1 4 0.1 0.2 31.4 30.2 93.3 0.75 135.0 40.5
J. Sears J. Sears F 29 22.3 9.5 5.3 0.9 1.0 0.6 2.0 3.1 12.2 -6 -0.2 -0.4 42.2 0 62.2 0.33 125.7 42.2
J. Duren J. Duren G 31 21.9 7.7 3.5 2.6 1.2 0.2 2.6 2.4 10.2 46 1.5 3.0 45.2 40.7 83.9 0.35 137.9 52.7
M. Townsend M. Townsend F 26 22.2 7.7 4.0 1.0 0.3 0.3 1.3 2.3 9.7 21 0.8 1.6 61.7 0 64.0 0.65 140.1 61.7
A. Cotton A. Cotton G 31 21.1 6.2 5.3 0.8 0.7 0.3 1.1 1.7 10.5 -27 -0.9 -1.8 56.6 36.4 83.9 -0.16 143.3 64.2
B. Sherrod B. Sherrod F 22 17.9 5.8 3.6 0.5 0.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 9.3 -1 -0.0 -0.1 23.8 0 62.5 0.12 201.2 23.8
J. Kreisberg J. Kreisberg C 27 16.2 5.6 2.8 0.7 0.3 0.2 1.3 1.7 6.5 -76 -2.8 -6.1 41.3 28.6 50.0 -1.06 138.7 43.5
M. Grace M. Grace G 30 17.7 5.1 1.4 2.2 0.7 0.1 1.4 2.0 6.1 -7 -0.2 -0.5 31.7 38.1 75.0 0.33 111.2 38.3
S. Martin S. Martin G 31 13.3 4.6 0.8 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.5 1.2 4.6 179 9.9 14.9 42.1 46.7 62.5 1.63 171.0 60.5
G. Kelley G. Kelley F 30 14.1 4.4 2.7 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.6 1.6 5.9 64 2.2 6.0 36.2 41.4 100.0 0.87 127.4 48.9
N. Victor N. Victor G 23 15.6 2.9 2.5 1.4 0.6 0.4 0.8 1.1 5.9 10 0.4 1.0 26.9 25.0 66.7 0.02 115.2 30.8
J. Montague J. Montague G 9 4.8 2.1 0.3 1.2 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.3 3.2 52 5.8 34.6 100.0 100.0 0 0.57 316.7 116.7
J. Pritchard J. Pritchard G 13 13.1 1.9 1.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.8 0.4 2.9 -40 -3.1 -9.0 40.0 0.0 100.0 -0.54 184.9 40.0
W. Childs-Klein W. Childs-Klein C 11 3.0 1.7 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 2.2 71 6.5 33.9 20.0 0.0 75.0 0.88 140.5 20.0
K. Ghani K. Ghani G 2 2.5 1.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 - - - 50.0 50.0 0 - 75.0 75.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG