Yale
2012 Team Stats (5 games)
61.6
PPG
65.2
Opp
+3.7
Margin
40.2%
FG%
32.9%
3P%
75.9%
FT%
36.8
RPG
12.0
APG
16.0
TO
75.7
Pace
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1514 (#69) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1385 (#102) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +25.6 (#129) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.511 (#59) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.243 (#120) | NetEff -9.7 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.401 (#75) | AdjNet -3.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.401 (#75) | AdjNet -3.5 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G. Mangano
|
F | 27 | 32.2 | 18.4 | 9.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 5.9 | 23.5 | - | - | - | 51.6 | 41.5 | 69.4 | - | 137.9 | 56.9 |
A. Morgan
|
G | 27 | 31.3 | 12.0 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 12.3 | - | - | - | 37.6 | 39.6 | 92.9 | - | 165.9 | 50.0 |
R. Willhite
|
G-F | 27 | 32.1 | 11.7 | 6.3 | 3.9 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 18.5 | - | - | - | 43.8 | 25.0 | 74.2 | - | 153.4 | 46.6 |
J. Kreisberg
|
C | 27 | 25.6 | 7.7 | 5.0 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 10.6 | - | - | - | 44.4 | 0.0 | 86.2 | - | 155.0 | 44.4 |
M. Grace
|
G | 24 | 21.3 | 5.5 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 6.6 | - | - | - | 45.0 | 9.1 | 78.3 | - | 131.7 | 46.2 |
B. Sherrod
|
F | 27 | 13.0 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 5.5 | - | - | - | 48.1 | 0 | 57.1 | - | 138.6 | 48.1 |
I. Salafia
|
G | 17 | 15.6 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 3.2 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 66.7 | 55.6 | - | 121.0 | 80.0 |
J. Pritchard
|
G | 26 | 14.1 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 4.1 | - | - | - | 12.5 | 16.7 | 50.0 | - | 261.3 | 18.8 |
S. Martin
|
G | 27 | 7.9 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 2.2 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 23.1 | 50.0 | - | 145.1 | 34.4 |
G. Kelley
|
F | 15 | 3.8 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 2.3 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | - | 189.0 | 58.3 |
J. Duren
|
G | 15 | 6.9 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 2.3 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 100.0 | 0.0 | - | 322.2 | 83.3 |
B. Katz
|
G | 2 | 7.0 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
A. Cotton
|
G | 11 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -0.12 | 700.0 | 0.0 |
M. Townsend
|
F | 18 | 7.3 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 2.3 | - | - | - | 27.3 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 74.7 | 27.3 |
W. Bartlett
|
F | 8 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 2.2 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 450.0 | 0.0 |
W. Childs-Klein
|
C | 8 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 2.1 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 450.0 | 100.0 |
R. Anderson
|
F | 12 | 3.7 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.2 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 159.6 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG