Wisconsin
2023 Team Stats (35 games)
Model Outputs
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1196 (#51) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1146 (#74) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1038 (#120) | HCA +85 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +9.8 (#61) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +10.3 (#57) | HCA +3.0 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.575 (#141) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More โ | 0.575 (#141) | NetEff +2.6 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.850 (#61) | AdjNet +15.0 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.852 (#60) | AdjNet +15.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.690 (#66) | AdjO 68.1 | AdjD 59.3 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.627 (#68) | AdjO 67.5 | AdjD 61.8 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.732 (#64) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.721 (#59) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1151 (#72) | RD 88 | GP 35 |
2023 Schedule & Results
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chucky Hepburn
|
- | 35 | 32.0 | 12.2 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 11.5 | 6.4 | 89 | 34 | 2.6 | 3.3 | 37.7 | 40.5 | 71.8 | 2.63 | 48.9 | 46.2 |
Steven Crowl
|
- | 35 | 30.6 | 12.1 | 6.9 | 2.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 9.7 | 11.1 | 59 | 34 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 51.0 | 30.7 | 63.4 | 1.73 | 56.7 | 55.0 |
Connor Essegian
|
G | 35 | 27.4 | 11.7 | 3.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 9.4 | 6.4 | -5 | 34 | -0.1 | -0.2 | 40.4 | 35.9 | 88.4 | 0.75 | 56.0 | 50.9 |
Tyler Wahl
|
- | 32 | 31.4 | 11.3 | 6.3 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 9.9 | 9.6 | 64 | 31 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 42.3 | 29.4 | 63.4 | 1.62 | 48.2 | 43.8 |
Max Klesmit
|
- | 33 | 32.0 | 8.4 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 6.5 | 6.3 | 56 | 32 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 42.3 | 38.3 | 69.6 | 0.2 | 56.2 | 53.0 |
Jordan Davis
|
G | 35 | 20.5 | 5.1 | 3.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 4.9 | 4.3 | 72 | 34 | 2.1 | 4.2 | 39.9 | 30.8 | 60.0 | 1.29 | 49.8 | 49.1 |
Carter Gilmore
|
- | 35 | 18.9 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 2.6 | 3.8 | 9 | 34 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 40.7 | 19.2 | 44.4 | -1.07 | 44.2 | 43.4 |
Markus Ilver
|
- | 18 | 6.6 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 0.6 | -21 | 17 | -1.2 | -7.2 | 29.7 | 23.8 | 100.0 | -3.94 | 38.3 | 36.5 |
Isaac Lindsey
|
- | 24 | 5.9 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 0.7 | -34 | 23 | -1.5 | -10.2 | 31.7 | 33.3 | 50.0 | -3.22 | 41.8 | 41.5 |
Kamari Mcgee
|
- | 31 | 7.3 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 5 | 31 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 28.0 | 18.5 | 87.5 | 0.5 | 37.4 | 33.0 |
Jahcobi Neath
|
G | 3 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 25.0 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 37.5 | 37.5 |
Ross Candelino
|
- | 5 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.0 | - | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | -2.45 | 82.0 | 100.0 |
Chris Hodges
|
- | 14 | 2.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | -4 | 13 | -0.3 | -5.3 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | -1.17 | 33.3 | 33.3 |
Isaac Gard
|
- | 5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | -0.2 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -2.45 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Luke Haertle
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Justin Taphorn
|
- | 5 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.69 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG
2022-2023 Shot Zones
363 located field-goal attempts in 6 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).
Steven CrowlChucky HepburnConnor EssegianTyler Wahl
| Zone | FGM-FGA | FG% | Pts | Top scorer | Runner-up | Most misses | Runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted area | 62-109 | 56.9 | 124 | Steven Crowl 31% (38 pts) | Tyler Wahl 19% (24 pts) | Tyler Wahl 34% (16 misses) | Chucky Hepburn 19% (9 misses) |
| Paint (non-RA) | 29-86 | 33.7 | 58 | Steven Crowl 41% (24 pts) | Chucky Hepburn 10% (6 pts) | Steven Crowl 35% (20 misses) | Chucky Hepburn 18% (10 misses) |
| Mid-range left | 0-11 | 0.0 | 0 | - | - | Chucky Hepburn 55% (6 misses) | Steven Crowl 18% (2 misses) |
| Mid-range center | 1-7 | 14.3 | 2 | Chucky Hepburn 100% (2 pts) | - | Chucky Hepburn 50% (3 misses) | Max Klesmit 33% (2 misses) |
| Mid-range right | 4-11 | 36.4 | 8 | Connor Essegian 50% (4 pts) | Kamari Mcgee 25% (2 pts) | Connor Essegian 29% (2 misses) | Steven Crowl 29% (2 misses) |
| Left corner 3 | 4-13 | 30.8 | 12 | Chucky Hepburn 50% (6 pts) | Connor Essegian 25% (3 pts) | Connor Essegian 33% (3 misses) | Jordan Davis 22% (2 misses) |
| Right corner 3 | 4-13 | 30.8 | 12 | Chucky Hepburn 50% (6 pts) | Max Klesmit 50% (6 pts) | Connor Essegian 44% (4 misses) | Chucky Hepburn 22% (2 misses) |
| Above-break 3 left | 11-53 | 20.8 | 33 | Chucky Hepburn 27% (9 pts) | Connor Essegian 18% (6 pts) | Chucky Hepburn 21% (9 misses) | Connor Essegian 19% (8 misses) |
| Above-break 3 center | 5-23 | 21.7 | 15 | Connor Essegian 60% (9 pts) | Max Klesmit 20% (3 pts) | Steven Crowl 33% (6 misses) | Max Klesmit 22% (4 misses) |
| Above-break 3 right | 18-37 | 48.6 | 54 | Chucky Hepburn 33% (18 pts) | Connor Essegian 22% (12 pts) | Chucky Hepburn 47% (9 misses) | Max Klesmit 26% (5 misses) |