Model Predictions
| Model | Grambling Tigers | Wisconsin Badgers | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elo | 18.9% (#144) | 81.1% (#51) | - |
| Bradley-Terry | 31.7% (#130) | 68.3% (#74) | - |
| Margin | 5.9% (#217) | 94.1% (#61) | Wiscons... -15.2 |
| Pythagorean | 51.4% (#79) | 48.6% (#141) | - |
| Efficiency | 61.4% (#79) | 38.6% (#141) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency | 3.1% (#214) | 96.9% (#61) | - |
| Log Adjusted | 2.7% (#216) | 97.3% (#60) | - |
| Points Off/Def | 22.1% (#213) | 77.9% (#66) | - |
Team Stats Comparison
| Stat | Grambling Tigers | Wisconsin Badgers |
|---|---|---|
| Games | 33 | 35 |
| PPG | 69.0 | 65.3 |
| FG% | 45.4% | 41.4% |
| 3PT% | 35.6% | 34.2% |
| FT% | 64.4% | 69.1% |
| RPG | 36.2 | 31.7 |
| APG | 12.3 | 11.6 |
| SPG | 7.3 | 5.9 |
| BPG | 4.1 | 1.5 |
| TOPG | 14.4 | 8.6 |
Efficiency Ratings
| Metric | Grambling Tigers | Wisconsin Badgers |
|---|---|---|
| Adj. Off Eff | 98.4 | 107.5 |
| Adj. Def Eff | 101.6 | 92.5 |
| Adj. Net Eff | -3.2 | 15.0 |
Efficiency = points per 100 possessions, adjusted for opponent strength
Grambling Tigers Top Players
| Player | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | MPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. Cowart | 11.4 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 32.4 |
| C. Christon | 13.0 | 5.4 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 28.5 |
| C. Gordon | 12.7 | 7.0 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 27.1 |
| J. Smith | 8.7 | 4.9 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 25.7 |
| V. Cotton | 7.7 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 25.1 |
Wisconsin Badgers Top Players
| Player | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | MPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Klesmit | 8.4 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 32.0 |
| C. Hepburn | 12.2 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 32.0 |
| T. Wahl | 11.3 | 6.3 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 31.4 |
| S. Crowl | 12.1 | 6.9 | 2.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 30.6 |
| C. Essegian | 11.7 | 3.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 27.4 |