🐻⬇️🏀

Vermont

Also known as: Vermont Catamounts
Program History

2026 Team Stats (33 games)

73.7
PPG
68.9
Opp
+4.8
Margin
46.3%
FG%
34.0%
3P%
71.5%
FT%
34.9
RPG
12.6
APG
9.4
TO
73.7
Pace
69.8
AdjO
75.0
AdjD
#236
Rank

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1023 (#163) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1009 (#172) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +109 elo More → 1055 (#99) HCA +109 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.2 More → -5.5 (#243) HCA +2.2
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.5 More → +9.4 (#237) HCA +2.5
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.634 (#92) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +13.3 More → 0.807 (#75) NetEff +13.3
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -6.8 More → 0.314 (#240) AdjNet -6.8
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -7.0 More → 0.309 (#241) AdjNet -7.0
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 69.8 | AdjD 75.0 More → 0.385 (#236) AdjO 69.8 | AdjD 75.0
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 70.4 | AdjD 66.8 More → 0.581 (#139) AdjO 70.4 | AdjD 66.8
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.712 (#213) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.689 (#202) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 126 | GP 33 More → 1061 (#185) RD 126 | GP 33

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-03 vs Western New England Golden Bears W 75 - 68
2025-11-05 vs Plattsburgh St Cardinals W 113 - 62
2025-11-09 @ Brown Bears W 89 - 84
2025-11-15 @ Northeastern Huskies W 85 - 74
2025-11-18 @ Buffalo Bulls L 90 - 94
2025-11-24 vs Liberty Flames L 73 - 79
2025-11-25 vs Rhode Island Rams L 65 - 80
2025-11-26 @ Princeton Tigers W 79 - 74
2025-11-30 vs Yale Bulldogs L 74 - 77
2025-12-03 @ Oregon State Beavers L 58 - 80
2025-12-14 vs Merrimack Warriors W 66 - 59
2025-12-17 vs Siena Saints W 83 - 69
2025-12-20 vs Iona Gaels L 78 - 83
2025-12-30 @ Princeton Tigers L 69 - 75
2026-01-03 @ New Hampshire Wildcats W 80 - 61
2026-01-08 vs Binghamton Bearcats W 60 - 59
2026-01-15 vs Maine Black Bears W 67 - 62
2026-01-19 @ UAlbany Great Danes L 68 - 75
2026-01-22 @ UMass Lowell River Hawks W 77 - 68
2026-01-24 @ Bryant Bulldogs W 62 - 52
2026-01-29 vs UMBC Retrievers W 64 - 55
2026-01-31 vs NJIT Highlanders L 77 - 79
2026-02-05 @ Maine Black Bears L 70 - 76
2026-02-07 vs New Hampshire Wildcats W 80 - 57
2026-02-12 @ Binghamton Bearcats W 73 - 65
2026-02-14 vs Bryant Bulldogs W 90 - 63
2026-02-19 @ UMBC Retrievers L 62 - 75
2026-02-21 @ NJIT Highlanders W 70 - 64
2026-02-26 vs UMass Lowell River Hawks W 66 - 64
2026-03-03 vs UAlbany Great Danes W 69 - 56
2026-03-07 vs Bryant Bulldogs W 77 - 57
2026-03-10 vs NJIT Highlanders W 63 - 54
2026-03-14 @ UMBC Retrievers L 59 - 74

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
G. Yalden G. Yalden F 30 25.8 16.4 5.9 2.1 0.5 0.5 1.7 12.4 11.2 42 2.1 3.8 50.9 35.3 66.4 0.58 58.7 56.5
TJ Hurley TJ Hurley - 33 31.0 14.9 3.5 1.3 0.7 0.1 0.9 10.5 9.2 47 2.0 3.1 46.8 38.1 87.0 -0.0 62.6 57.7
Tj Long Tj Long - 28 29.4 12.2 4.9 1.2 0.9 0.2 1.1 10.5 7.7 42 2.2 3.5 38.6 31.1 79.7 -0.2 52.4 48.1
Sean Blake Sean Blake - 33 28.5 10.0 4.1 3.8 0.7 0.3 2.3 7.8 8.8 99 4.3 6.8 46.9 35.8 68.7 0.48 54.5 50.6
Noah Barnett Noah Barnett - 30 22.4 6.0 3.6 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.4 3.3 7.8 23 1.1 2.6 66.3 50.0 64.1 -0.28 68.4 66.8
B. Johnson B. Johnson G 33 18.3 5.5 2.1 1.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 4.2 4.8 75 3.3 8.1 45.3 44.2 72.2 0.45 63.1 62.0
Lucas Mari Lucas Mari - 30 20.0 4.9 4.0 1.7 0.4 0.2 1.2 4.2 5.8 22 1.1 2.6 38.6 26.3 70.0 -0.23 50.5 46.5
Momo Nkugwa Momo Nkugwa - 29 12.8 2.9 2.3 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.4 2.4 3.8 43 2.3 10.2 48.6 22.6 52.9 0.27 54.2 53.6
D. Simon D. Simon - 17 9.8 2.6 1.9 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.6 1.8 2.9 -14 -0.8 -4.1 61.3 40.0 44.4 -0.2 62.9 64.5
B. Michaels B. Michaels F 30 12.8 2.0 2.2 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.5 1.9 2.6 -61 -2.8 -7.3 38.6 10.0 62.5 -1.08 45.1 40.4
Ben Wesson Ben Wesson - 7 2.3 1.9 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.0 1.4 -13 -3.2 -143.1 71.4 66.7 50.0 -0.0 82.5 85.7
J. Skipper J. Skipper - 30 8.2 1.8 1.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.5 1.6 1.3 41 2.0 10.5 34.7 27.3 76.9 0.19 48.4 43.9
T. Woodyard T. Woodyard - 2 9.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 -7 -1.2 -26.6 25.0 33.3 0 -0.0 37.5 37.5
Drew Bessette Drew Bessette - 5 2.4 0.4 1.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.8 1.4 5 2.5 206.9 25.0 0.0 0 -0.02 25.0 25.0
Sincere Clemons Sincere Clemons - 6 2.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.7 -0.5 7 3.5 289.7 0.0 0.0 50.0 -0.02 10.2 0.0
C. Kuzemka C. Kuzemka G 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG