Oregon Ducks
2011 Team Stats (8 games)
77.5
PPG
70.2
Opp
+0.7
Margin
42.6%
FG%
34.6%
3P%
74.7%
FT%
32.4
RPG
14.9
APG
11.6
TO
84.2
Pace
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1468 (#91) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1584 (#21) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +33.7 (#45) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.466 (#59) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.359 (#130) | NetEff -5.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.619 (#49) | AdjNet +4.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.624 (#48) | AdjNet +4.4 |
2011 Schedule & Results
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Catron
|
F | 24 | 29.3 | 17.1 | 6.9 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 6.5 | 18.5 | 2 | 2.0 | 18.4 | 47.1 | 29.2 | 67.2 | 0.2 | 98.2 | 49.4 |
E.J. Singler
|
F | 25 | 31.9 | 12.4 | 5.2 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 5.1 | 14.5 | 3 | 3.0 | 26.4 | 50.0 | 52.6 | 82.2 | 0.27 | 104.9 | 61.7 |
J. Strowbridge
|
G | 25 | 26.4 | 10.4 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 4.6 | 8.9 | 4 | 4.0 | 47.8 | 40.9 | 32.8 | 82.1 | -0.09 | 102.1 | 49.1 |
M. Armstead
|
G | 25 | 27.6 | 9.1 | 3.2 | 4.6 | 2.4 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 4.5 | 12.3 | 6 | 6.0 | 83.2 | 38.4 | 28.1 | 80.0 | -0.13 | 94.4 | 42.4 |
J. Jacob
|
F | 5 | 16.2 | 8.0 | 3.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 4.6 | 7.2 | - | - | - | 39.1 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 80.8 | 39.1 |
G. Sim
|
G | 25 | 26.8 | 7.9 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 3.6 | 8.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 47.2 | 38.5 | 75.0 | 0.29 | 101.2 | 58.4 |
T. Nared
|
F | 25 | 21.8 | 5.4 | 4.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 8.1 | 2 | 2.0 | 48.0 | 46.4 | 44.4 | 70.0 | -0.71 | 104.2 | 50.0 |
J. Loyd
|
G | 25 | 18.4 | 4.4 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 2.3 | 5.8 | 1 | 1.0 | 14.5 | 29.8 | 21.7 | 78.9 | -0.22 | 74.6 | 34.2 |
T. Williams
|
G | 24 | 14.3 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 2.8 | 4.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 42.4 | 50.0 | 61.5 | -0.24 | 71.8 | 53.8 |
M. Losli
|
G | 5 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
N. Fearn
|
G | 16 | 3.7 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 1 | 1.0 | 27.3 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | -0.85 | 33.3 | 33.3 |
M. Seiferth
|
F | 4 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1 | 1.0 | 27.3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -0.85 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
N. Lucenti
|
G | 2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG