Navy Midshipmen
2013 Team Stats (1 games)
65.0
PPG
60.9
Opp
-5.8
Margin
58.1%
FG%
58.3%
3P%
47.1%
FT%
29.0
RPG
16.0
APG
15.0
TO
65.5
Pace
Model Outputs
2012-2013
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1137 (#256) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1181 (#243) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 893 (#558) | HCA +147 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +18.1 (#273) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -3.0 (#360) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.500 (#57) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.236 (#158) | NetEff -11.5 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.101 (#107) | AdjNet -19.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.099 (#107) | AdjNet -19.2 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.334 (#564) | AdjO 53.5 | AdjD 61.1 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.358 (#389) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.332 (#425) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 811 (#545) | RD 160 | GP 31 |
2013 Schedule & Results
2013 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W. Smith
|
F | 31 | 29.5 | 10.2 | 5.4 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 15.5 | -82 | -2.6 | -4.1 | 47.4 | 100.0 | 58.3 | -0.02 | 365.1 | 52.6 |
T. Dunbar
|
G | 31 | 30.5 | 9.5 | 2.2 | 4.9 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 13.7 | -113 | -3.6 | -5.2 | 48.6 | 0.0 | 68.0 | -0.5 | 308.3 | 48.6 |
B. Venturini
|
G | 31 | 26.5 | 8.8 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 12.0 | -88 | -2.8 | -5.1 | 32.0 | 28.6 | 0.0 | -0.19 | 527.4 | 40.0 |
K. Knorr
|
G | 27 | 20.4 | 5.8 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 8.5 | -105 | -3.9 | -6.8 | 52.4 | 52.9 | 80.0 | -0.63 | 309.1 | 73.8 |
K. Alter
|
G | 27 | 10.5 | 4.0 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 4.8 | -76 | -2.7 | -6.9 | 83.3 | 83.3 | 66.7 | -0.52 | 737.7 | 125.0 |
T. Wynn
|
G | 30 | 16.7 | 3.9 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 7.0 | -44 | -1.5 | -5.3 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 70.0 | -0.21 | 353.7 | 25.0 |
I. Roberts
|
G | 7 | 15.9 | 3.4 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 6.6 | -7 | -1.0 | -1.9 | 100.0 | 0 | 40.0 | -0.02 | 285.7 | 100.0 |
P. Guglielmo
|
- | 21 | 9.8 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 3.2 | -51 | -2.4 | -7.4 | 60.0 | 50.0 | 0 | -0.2 | 640.0 | 80.0 |
W. Kelly
|
C | 31 | 17.4 | 2.7 | 3.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 6.1 | -28 | -0.9 | -2.2 | 60.0 | 0 | 33.3 | 0.43 | 656.6 | 60.0 |
J. Alexander
|
- | 27 | 8.9 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 3.1 | -73 | -2.7 | -7.8 | 45.5 | 0 | 66.7 | 0.31 | 284.1 | 45.5 |
J. Loupos
|
F | 30 | 15.3 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 4.0 | -88 | -2.9 | -7.7 | 56.2 | 100.0 | 50.0 | -0.75 | 181.4 | 62.5 |
D. Jackson
|
G | 9 | 8.2 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 3.1 | 65 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 |
B. Wyatt
|
G | 31 | 9.4 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 3.8 | -47 | -1.6 | -5.4 | 37.5 | 25.0 | 44.4 | -0.63 | 242.5 | 43.8 |
J. Smoot
|
C | 22 | 9.4 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 3.1 | -61 | -2.8 | -10.7 | 42.9 | 0 | 57.1 | -0.82 | 168.7 | 42.9 |
R. Spadaford
|
- | 12 | 4.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.03 | 750.0 | 0.0 |
E. McLaurin
|
G | 8 | 3.8 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.4 | -7 | -0.8 | -7.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.02 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG