Gonzaga
2011 Team Stats (11 games)
76.8
PPG
66.7
Opp
+10.8
Margin
47.3%
FG%
39.2%
3P%
76.4%
FT%
37.3
RPG
14.8
APG
13.8
TO
80.6
Pace
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1828 (#13) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1691 (#3) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +42.0 (#5) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.630 (#27) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.672 (#59) | NetEff +6.6 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.662 (#44) | AdjNet +5.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.662 (#44) | AdjNet +5.8 |
2011 Schedule & Results
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K. Standish
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 23.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 13.0 | 17.0 | - | - | - | 76.9 | 0 | 75.0 | - | 77.9 | 76.9 |
J. Bekkering
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 17.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 13.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | 53.8 | 42.9 | 0 | - | 65.4 | 65.4 |
C. Vandersloot
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 16.0 | 4.0 | 14.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 12.0 | 24.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 33.3 | 60.0 | - | 56.3 | 54.2 |
S. Gray
|
G | 23 | 32.8 | 15.0 | 4.4 | 3.9 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 7.4 | 15.7 | - | - | - | 45.0 | 38.6 | 76.0 | - | 89.6 | 54.4 |
R. Sacre
|
C | 23 | 26.3 | 12.8 | 6.5 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 4.9 | 15.8 | - | - | - | 45.1 | 0 | 80.6 | - | 101.6 | 45.1 |
K. Redmon
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 12.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 11.0 | 12.0 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 50.5 | 45.5 |
E. Harris
|
F | 23 | 26.0 | 12.0 | 5.8 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 5.4 | 13.1 | - | - | - | 50.8 | 45.0 | 79.3 | - | 100.5 | 54.4 |
S. Dower
|
C | 23 | 14.3 | 8.2 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 9.3 | - | - | - | 59.0 | 66.7 | 78.1 | - | 125.2 | 60.7 |
M. Carter
|
G | 23 | 20.9 | 7.3 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 8.4 | - | - | - | 40.3 | 41.7 | 80.0 | - | 111.7 | 48.4 |
D. Goodson
|
G | 23 | 22.9 | 5.2 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 35.1 | 23.1 | 64.0 | - | 87.5 | 37.7 |
K. Olynyk
|
F | 23 | 13.0 | 5.1 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 6.4 | - | - | - | 58.7 | 42.9 | 70.6 | - | 110.3 | 62.0 |
M. Arop
|
F | 17 | 15.1 | 4.6 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 2.4 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 55.0 | 50.0 | 57.1 | - | 91.7 | 62.5 |
D. Stockton
|
G | 22 | 15.9 | 4.5 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 6.7 | - | - | - | 34.5 | 18.8 | 80.0 | - | 158.7 | 39.7 |
K. Bowen
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | - | 66.7 | 66.7 |
M. Monninghoff
|
F | 20 | 12.6 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 2.9 | - | - | - | 43.8 | 45.5 | 100.0 | - | 95.6 | 59.4 |
M. Keita
|
G | 12 | 8.0 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 3.3 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 225.3 | 33.3 |
M. Hart
|
G | 21 | 5.0 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.3 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 64.4 | 33.3 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG