🐻⬇️🏀

Dartmouth Big Green

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016
Also known as: Dartmouth Big Green
Program History

2013 Team Stats (5 games)

64.2
PPG
65.9
Opp
-4.5
Margin
45.4%
FG%
34.2%
3P%
81.9%
FT%
28.4
RPG
12.4
APG
12.0
TO
69.1
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1215 (#209) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1138 (#281) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 933 (#513) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +16.5 (#316) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → +4.0 (#243) HCA +3.3
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.252 (#99) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +1.9 More → 0.554 (#87) NetEff +1.9
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -20.7 More → 0.084 (#109) AdjNet -20.7
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -20.9 More → 0.082 (#109) AdjNet -20.9
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 63.1 | AdjD 64.3 More → 0.472 (#354) AdjO 63.1 | AdjD 64.3
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.481 (#294) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.470 (#291) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 150 | GP 28 More → 879 (#457) RD 150 | GP 28

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-11-10 vs Maine Black Bears W 67 - 54
2012-11-13 vs New Hampshire Wildcats L 58 - 72
2012-11-24 vs Purdue Fort Wayne Mastodons L 66 - 70
2012-11-27 @ Bucknell Bison L 49 - 62
2012-12-01 @ Longwood Lancers W 61 - 53
2012-12-04 @ Elon Phoenix L 49 - 71
2012-12-08 @ Holy Cross Crusaders L 56 - 67
2012-12-12 @ Vermont Catamounts L 50 - 52
2012-12-15 @ Arizona State Sun Devils L 42 - 61
2012-12-22 @ Bryant Bulldogs L 66 - 79
2012-12-31 @ Boston College Eagles L 58 - 79
2013-01-05 vs Colgate Raiders L 62 - 78
2013-01-08 vs Army Black Knights W 75 - 58
2013-01-12 vs Harvard Crimson L 65 - 75
2013-01-17 vs Colby College Colby W 80 - 42
2013-01-26 @ Harvard Crimson L 77 - 82
2013-02-01 vs Brown Bears L 50 - 62
2013-02-02 vs Yale Bulldogs W 71 - 62
2013-02-08 @ Columbia Lions W 60 - 57
2013-02-10 @ Cornell Big Red L 56 - 79
2013-02-15 vs Princeton Tigers L 55 - 73
2013-02-16 vs Pennsylvania Quakers L 57 - 67
2013-02-22 @ Yale Bulldogs L 67 - 78
2013-02-23 @ Brown Bears L 50 - 59
2013-03-01 @ Pennsylvania Quakers W 69 - 64
2013-03-02 @ Princeton Tigers L 63 - 68
2013-03-08 vs Cornell Big Red W 76 - 62
2013-03-09 vs Columbia Lions W 64 - 58

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
G. Maldunas G. Maldunas F 27 27.3 11.3 6.8 1.3 1.1 1.4 2.0 3.3 16.5 -57 -2.0 -3.4 51.1 0.0 70.7 -0.04 143.3 51.1
A. Mitola A. Mitola G 27 33.0 11.3 2.5 2.0 1.1 0.0 2.2 3.3 11.6 -123 -4.4 -6.2 39.3 41.5 87.5 -0.52 159.3 51.7
C. Boehm C. Boehm F 27 24.9 8.8 5.5 0.7 0.3 0.2 1.6 2.4 11.5 -50 -1.8 -3.0 55.4 28.6 81.8 -0.01 169.7 58.5
J. Golden J. Golden G 27 31.0 7.5 2.8 1.4 1.1 0.2 1.2 2.2 9.7 -101 -3.6 -5.2 42.4 32.0 78.3 -0.57 146.8 49.2
T. Melville T. Melville G 26 19.4 7.2 1.3 1.4 0.4 0.1 1.3 1.4 7.7 -20 -0.7 -1.4 59.5 53.3 80.8 0.44 193.0 70.3
J. Brooks J. Brooks C 19 23.7 7.0 5.6 1.2 0.5 0.1 1.7 1.3 11.4 243 6.6 9.1 33.3 0.0 70.8 1.21 192.4 33.3
M. Gill M. Gill G 25 16.4 5.1 1.4 1.8 1.7 0.1 1.6 1.4 7.0 -59 -2.3 -5.0 33.3 53.8 85.7 -0.73 162.5 43.1
K. Crescenzi K. Crescenzi G 26 11.7 2.2 1.7 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.8 1.2 2.7 -31 -1.1 -3.2 38.7 30.0 0 0.09 91.9 48.4
T. Carpenter T. Carpenter F 20 9.7 1.8 1.1 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.8 0.6 2.2 -65 -2.5 -3.7 41.7 0.0 0 0.33 145.8 41.7
B. McDonnell B. McDonnell F 25 8.2 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 1.6 13 0.5 1.8 40.0 20.0 100.0 0.39 105.4 45.0
M. McKearney M. McKearney G 14 3.4 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.1 15 0.9 5.1 0 0 0 0.22 0 0
M. LaBove M. LaBove C 24 4.2 0.5 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 1.0 -28 -1.2 -7.1 0.0 0 100.0 -0.24 154.6 0.0
W. McConnell W. McConnell F 12 1.5 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 - - - 100.0 0 0 - 250.0 100.0
M. Rennie M. Rennie F 15 2.9 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.9 -30 -1.9 -9.0 0 0 0 -0.23 0 0
K. Savolainen K. Savolainen G-F 7 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG