Chicago State
2026 Team Stats (32 games)
Model Outputs
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 803 (#325) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 741 (#346) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 911 (#310) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | -13.2 (#331) | - |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | -12.3 (#330) | - |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.118 (#345) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More โ | Unavailable | Not published: possession data incomplete for 2025-26 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | Unavailable | Not published: possession data incomplete for 2025-26 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | Unavailable | Not published: possession data incomplete for 2025-26 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.247 (#331) | - |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.351 (#324) | - |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | Unavailable | Not published: possession data incomplete for 2025-26 |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | Unavailable | Not published: possession data incomplete for 2025-26 |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 744 (#343) | - |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cj Ray
|
- | 32 | 31.1 | 13.5 | 4.7 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 11.9 | 7.4 | - | - | - | - | 42.3 | 37.2 | 85.2 | - | 52.0 | 47.8 |
Marcus Tankersley
|
G | 30 | 30.6 | 13.0 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 10.9 | 6.4 | - | - | - | - | 45.4 | 23.3 | 65.6 | - | 50.7 | 46.5 |
Doyel Cockrill III
|
G | 28 | 24.4 | 11.8 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 9.2 | 7.1 | - | - | - | - | 38.0 | 36.4 | 83.3 | - | 55.4 | 49.4 |
Tank Byard
|
- | 22 | 22.6 | 9.8 | 4.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 8.0 | 7.6 | -72 | 17 | -4.2 | -8.5 | 46.9 | 41.7 | 73.4 | 0.22 | 53.2 | 48.3 |
Braelon Bush
|
- | 26 | 25.9 | 8.5 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 7.8 | 5.5 | - | - | - | - | 38.7 | 27.7 | 91.9 | - | 49.9 | 45.6 |
Chauncey Gibson
|
- | 15 | 15.5 | 4.9 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 6.0 | 2.1 | - | - | - | - | 30.0 | 26.4 | 42.9 | - | 38.5 | 37.8 |
Dailliss Cox
|
- | 32 | 15.2 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 3.6 | -100 | 25 | -4.0 | -10.3 | 46.8 | 33.3 | 69.2 | -1.78 | 50.1 | 48.4 |
Malek Robinson
|
- | 32 | 15.4 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 2.4 | 4.0 | - | - | - | - | 32.1 | 31.8 | 70.4 | - | 46.7 | 36.5 |
Lionel Larvadain
|
- | 21 | 11.2 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 1.2 | - | - | - | - | 29.4 | 20.0 | 71.4 | - | 37.5 | 31.6 |
Corey Sands
|
- | 30 | 17.4 | 2.8 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 3.1 | 2.2 | - | - | - | - | 30.9 | 25.8 | 73.3 | - | 42.2 | 39.4 |
Joseph Owens
|
- | 26 | 11.2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 3.2 | -40 | 21 | -1.9 | -6.7 | 53.7 | 0 | 62.5 | -2.08 | 56.2 | 53.7 |
CJ Delancy
|
- | 6 | 9.2 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 2.2 | - | - | - | - | 44.4 | 0 | 100.0 | -1.65 | 50.6 | 44.4 |
Deshawn Jean-Charles
|
- | 4 | 8.5 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 2.0 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 75.0 | -0.47 | 31.5 | 0.0 |
Daniel Zatsepin
|
- | 28 | 7.8 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 1.5 | - | - | - | - | 33.3 | 50.0 | 50.0 | - | 37.7 | 35.2 |
Dakari Thomas
|
- | 21 | 4.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.1 | - | - | - | - | 42.9 | 0 | 63.6 | - | 54.9 | 42.9 |
D. Bates
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Greg Spate
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG
2025-2026 Shot Zones
1823 located field-goal attempts in 32 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).
Cj RayMarcus TankersleyDoyel Cockrill IIIBraelon BushTank ByardCorey Sands
| Zone | FGM-FGA | FG% | Pts | Top scorer | Runner-up | Most misses | Runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted area | 235-418 | 56.2 | 470 | Cj Ray 21% (98 pts) | Marcus Tankersley 20% (94 pts) | Marcus Tankersley 19% (35 misses) | Cj Ray 15% (28 misses) |
| Paint (non-RA) | 185-455 | 40.7 | 370 | Marcus Tankersley 31% (116 pts) | Cj Ray 22% (82 pts) | Marcus Tankersley 26% (70 misses) | Cj Ray 21% (57 misses) |
| Mid-range left | 35-125 | 28.0 | 70 | Tank Byard 23% (16 pts) | Dailliss Cox 17% (12 pts) | Cj Ray 22% (20 misses) | Marcus Tankersley 22% (20 misses) |
| Mid-range center | 31-63 | 49.2 | 62 | Braelon Bush 29% (18 pts) | Marcus Tankersley 23% (14 pts) | Braelon Bush 25% (8 misses) | Cj Ray 16% (5 misses) |
| Mid-range right | 68-196 | 34.7 | 136 | Cj Ray 29% (40 pts) | Marcus Tankersley 26% (36 pts) | Cj Ray 30% (38 misses) | Marcus Tankersley 21% (27 misses) |
| Left corner 3 | 15-56 | 26.8 | 45 | Braelon Bush 27% (12 pts) | Corey Sands 27% (12 pts) | Corey Sands 24% (10 misses) | Braelon Bush 20% (8 misses) |
| Right corner 3 | 12-43 | 27.9 | 36 | Marcus Tankersley 25% (9 pts) | Braelon Bush 17% (6 pts) | Doyel Cockrill III 26% (8 misses) | Braelon Bush 23% (7 misses) |
| Above-break 3 left | 57-173 | 32.9 | 171 | Cj Ray 28% (48 pts) | Doyel Cockrill III 26% (45 pts) | Doyel Cockrill III 26% (30 misses) | Cj Ray 21% (24 misses) |
| Above-break 3 center | 37-119 | 31.1 | 111 | Doyel Cockrill III 38% (42 pts) | Cj Ray 35% (39 pts) | Doyel Cockrill III 33% (27 misses) | Cj Ray 28% (23 misses) |
| Above-break 3 right | 59-175 | 33.7 | 177 | Doyel Cockrill III 37% (66 pts) | Braelon Bush 20% (36 pts) | Doyel Cockrill III 27% (31 misses) | Braelon Bush 19% (22 misses) |