Boise State
2022 Team Stats (7 games)
67.1
PPG
60.8
Opp
+8.2
Margin
43.4%
FG%
35.8%
3P%
65.2%
FT%
35.1
RPG
11.6
APG
13.1
TO
75.3
Pace
Model Outputs
2021-2022
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1269 (#91) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1411 (#36) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1123 (#42) | HCA +115 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +34.0 (#57) | HCA +2.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +19.8 (#75) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.725 (#17) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.789 (#38) | NetEff +10.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.582 (#58) | AdjNet +2.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.583 (#58) | AdjNet +2.9 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.648 (#71) | AdjO 68.8 | AdjD 62.1 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.907 (#30) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.883 (#32) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1345 (#14) | RD 113 | GP 33 |
2022 Schedule & Results
2022 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Kigab
|
F | 13 | 31.3 | 15.2 | 5.1 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 6.3 | 15.4 | 235 | 6.7 | 8.7 | 50.0 | 36.0 | 68.3 | 1.76 | 98.5 | 55.5 |
M. Shaver Jr.
|
- | 32 | 33.1 | 13.4 | 3.8 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 16.1 | -219 | -6.8 | -8.6 | 33.3 | 24.3 | 78.7 | 0.92 | 183.4 | 38.0 |
J. Allen-Tovar
|
F | 1 | 30.0 | 11.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 16.0 | 31 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.69 | 0 | 0 |
Tyson Degenhart
|
- | 33 | 29.3 | 10.4 | 4.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 14.0 | 242 | 6.9 | 9.9 | 46.9 | 48.3 | 58.8 | 1.83 | 239.2 | 57.8 |
B. Horvath
|
F | 2 | 34.5 | 10.0 | 5.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 15.5 | 209 | 6.1 | 7.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 |
E. Akot
|
- | 16 | 31.8 | 9.8 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 2.6 | 4.9 | 8.6 | 179 | 5.8 | 7.4 | 39.7 | 35.0 | 57.1 | 1.11 | 86.4 | 48.7 |
D. Doutrive
|
G | 1 | 26.0 | 8.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 2.0 | 9 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 40.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.03 | 40.0 | 40.0 |
M. Armus
|
F | 18 | 26.5 | 7.0 | 8.4 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 13.4 | 203 | 5.8 | 8.9 | 59.0 | 0 | 40.7 | 1.15 | 123.8 | 59.0 |
N. Smith
|
- | 32 | 16.1 | 5.0 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 8.4 | 52 | 1.5 | 3.8 | 41.7 | 33.3 | 77.8 | 0.24 | 284.3 | 50.0 |
M. Rice
|
- | 33 | 22.2 | 4.2 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 7.1 | 127 | 3.6 | 6.6 | 35.5 | 33.3 | 72.7 | 0.83 | 195.3 | 45.2 |
T. Pulliam
|
G | 2 | 20.5 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 189 | 6.1 | 8.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.31 | 0 | 0 |
J. Tomaic
|
F | 2 | 9.5 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 89 | 2.9 | 9.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.68 | 0 | 0 |
C. Baker-Mazara
|
- | 2 | 15.5 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 86 | 2.8 | 8.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 |
L. Moerman
|
C | 1 | 18.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | -184 | -6.8 | -14.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.26 | 0 | 0 |
P. Kuzmanovic
|
- | 6 | 7.7 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 21 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.08 | 500.0 | 0.0 |
L. Milner
|
- | 24 | 7.2 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 3.1 | -34 | -1.3 | -6.8 | 33.3 | 0 | 50.0 | -0.3 | 239.8 | 33.3 |
S. Winter
|
- | 5 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 250.0 | 150.0 |
K. Pryor
|
- | 5 | 3.4 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 1 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.01 | 0 | 0 |
RJ Keene
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
K. Dinwiddie Jr.
|
- | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | -48 | -1.5 | -2.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.09 | 0 | 0 |
K. Brown
|
G | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -44 | -4.0 | -18.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.99 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG