Western Illinois
2013 Team Stats (1 games)
38.0
PPG
52.1
Opp
+6.0
Margin
34.8%
FG%
20.0%
3P%
42.9%
FT%
26.0
RPG
7.0
APG
9.0
TO
58.1
Pace
Model Outputs
2012-2013
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 866 (#980) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1177 (#248) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1066 (#85) | HCA +147 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +17.2 (#293) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +5.8 (#216) | HCA +3.3 |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.426 (#115) | NetEff -2.0 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.518 (#193) | AdjO 56.8 | AdjD 56.0 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.717 (#144) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.685 (#146) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1145 (#89) | RD 126 | GP 30 |
2013 Schedule & Results
2013 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T. Parks
|
F-C | 26 | 31.4 | 12.7 | 9.6 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 24.0 | 103 | 4.0 | 5.8 | 60.0 | 0 | 35.7 | 0.38 | 399.7 | 60.0 |
C. Clark III
|
G | 30 | 35.6 | 12.5 | 3.3 | 4.1 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 18.7 | -50 | -2.2 | -6.4 | 47.4 | 45.8 | 40.0 | 0.18 | 465.2 | 61.8 |
A. Link
|
F | 31 | 32.8 | 9.9 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 14.5 | 99 | 3.2 | 4.3 | 52.0 | 0 | 78.6 | -0.11 | 492.6 | 52.0 |
J. Houpt
|
F | 31 | 33.5 | 7.4 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 11.7 | 216 | 7.0 | 9.0 | 38.9 | 33.3 | 0 | 1.69 | 633.3 | 52.8 |
D. McAvoy III
|
F | 31 | 24.6 | 6.7 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 9.3 | - | - | - | 40.6 | 14.3 | 75.0 | - | 277.6 | 42.2 |
R. Roberts-Burnett
|
G | 23 | 27.8 | 6.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 9.8 | 58 | 5.8 | 5.2 | 37.5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.66 | 931.2 | 37.5 |
M. Ochereobia
|
C | 31 | 8.9 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 5.6 | 52 | 1.7 | 6.1 | 50.0 | 0 | 55.6 | 0.47 | 293.0 | 50.0 |
J. Foster
|
G | 31 | 12.9 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 3.3 | 76 | 2.5 | 5.7 | 35.3 | 100.0 | 83.3 | 0.21 | 202.0 | 41.2 |
J. Hawthorne
|
G | 19 | 9.2 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 89 | 4.7 | 15.9 | 36.4 | 33.3 | 0 | 0.84 | 213.6 | 45.5 |
J. Walker
|
- | 5 | 4.0 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 2.2 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.03 | 121.5 | 0.0 |
I. Duncan
|
- | 4 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.5 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG